How come Glynis Howard didn't notice paint on Silencer...

[mike tesko]

On the 13th August 1985 in so far as the story goes, 'Ron'  Cook took a sound moderator to the lab' at Huntingdon, for Glynis Howard to examine. Prior to this DS Jones had collected it from Petsr Eaton on the previous day. How odd that neither DS Jones, nor DI Cook, and certainly not Glynis Howard, saw orade any mention of a pressence of any red paint in the knurl of the soynd moderators end cap?

[lookout]

COLP had discovered that Glynis Howard and her associates had ALL signed a set of false documents for a second silencer to create a paper-chain of evidence to deceive the jury--------which it did.

The same silencers,Parker-Hale,were switched. SBJ/1 was taken from its cardboard tube,to which DB/1 was then introduced complete with red paint from the scene of the crime.
The matter was put before COLP and EP,but then cleverly covered up under PII.

[lookout]

The PII is yet but another area where it is used to cover up corruption,which makes a complete and utter nonsense of the Freedom of Information Act,don't you think ?

[mike tesko]

The PII is yet but another area where it is used to cover up corruption,which makes a complete and utter nonsense of the Freedom of Information Act,don't you think ?

Hi Lookout,

Yes, I agree, everytbing is stacked in the police' favour - if you are found out lying and fabricating evidence, you stand a really good chance of being promoted...