Author Topic: The lockable from outside window. A time for closure ?  (Read 26087 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Mr. Gee

  • Guest
Re: The lockable from outside window. A time for closure ?
« Reply #30 on: December 04, 2014, 11:16:AM »
To me it is offensive.

He often calls me this whenever I have a different view to him. I never accuse him of being this when he has a different view to me.
I have reported this post because Adam is always reporting me for telling the truth. ::)

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44324
Re: The lockable from outside window. A time for closure ?
« Reply #31 on: December 04, 2014, 12:19:PM »
I call someone naive because I have explained all this in detail before as to why Jeremy would not have worn a wetsuit. To completely ignore my knowledge on the subject is not only naive it is just plain stupid.

I have reported this to the moderators.

I was answering another persons posts on this thread. Who mentioned the wet suit.

You provided no source for you're statement on why he would not wear one. Bob Woffinden & Robert Boutflour both believe he may have done. Do they know more about the case than you ? Yes.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17251
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: The lockable from outside window. A time for closure ?
« Reply #32 on: December 04, 2014, 12:32:PM »
the police tested the window and said it  was no different from the others so you have ann eatons word vs the police.

one of them must be wrong.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The lockable from outside window. A time for closure ?
« Reply #33 on: December 04, 2014, 12:47:PM »
 WINDOWS WERE ALL TESTED BY POLICE !

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17251
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: The lockable from outside window. A time for closure ?
« Reply #34 on: December 04, 2014, 12:49:PM »
and found to be all the same i believe ie not lockable from the outside.

i ant see why the police would want to lie about that.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The lockable from outside window. A time for closure ?
« Reply #35 on: December 04, 2014, 12:54:PM »
 Not really,nugs,because at that early stage,they were looking for clues.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17251
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: The lockable from outside window. A time for closure ?
« Reply #36 on: December 04, 2014, 01:00:PM »
well they wouldent lie to protect jeremy.

Mr. Gee

  • Guest
Re: The lockable from outside window. A time for closure ?
« Reply #37 on: December 04, 2014, 01:32:PM »
I have reported this to the moderators.

I was answering another persons posts on this thread. Who mentioned the wet suit.

You provided no source for you're statement on why he would not wear one. Bob Woffinden & Robert Boutflour both believe he may have done. Do they know more about the case than you ? Yes.
I've reported this post because Adam is being deliberately silly.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17251
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: The lockable from outside window. A time for closure ?
« Reply #38 on: December 04, 2014, 01:38:PM »
i think it is time for closer on the window issue it clearly couldent be locked fromthe outside what ever ae says.

Mr. Gee

  • Guest
Re: The lockable from outside window. A time for closure ?
« Reply #39 on: December 04, 2014, 01:43:PM »
I have reported this to the moderators.

I was answering another persons posts on this thread. Who mentioned the wet suit.

You provided no source for you're statement on why he would not wear one. Bob Woffinden & Robert Boutflour both believe he may have done. Do they know more about the case than you ? Yes.
I have reported this post because of Adam's willful ignorance and because he has offered no proof of the wetsuit being used. You are becoming silly now Adam.

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: The lockable from outside window. A time for closure ?
« Reply #40 on: December 04, 2014, 01:56:PM »
i think it is time for closer on the window issue it clearly couldent be locked fromthe outside what ever ae says.
I agree nugs, no one managed to lock it, the police weren't able to do so neither could AE.  If Jeremy was able to lock it, he is the only person who knew how to do so and it was never proven.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17251
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: The lockable from outside window. A time for closure ?
« Reply #41 on: December 04, 2014, 02:05:PM »
i dont why people who think hes guilty are so obbsed with this wndow when there was an open upstairs window.

Mr. Gee

  • Guest
Re: The lockable from outside window. A time for closure ?
« Reply #42 on: December 04, 2014, 02:37:PM »
i dont why people who think hes guilty are so obbsed with this wndow when there was an open upstairs window.
Because it's all they've got as they simply cannot prove in any way that Jeremy was at the house that morning. So as a consequence to replace this abysmal lack of evidence they clutch at these silly theories in order to build their castles of sand.

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: The lockable from outside window. A time for closure ?
« Reply #43 on: December 04, 2014, 02:46:PM »
i dont why people who think hes guilty are so obbsed with this wndow when there was an open upstairs window.

Because that is where the relatives decided Jeremy exited the house. They were at WHF discussing whether it was the kitchen window or the scullery window when a robin flew in and shat in the window sill of the kitchen window - so that must be the one Jeremy used.
So they told Colin Caffell.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17251
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: The lockable from outside window. A time for closure ?
« Reply #44 on: December 04, 2014, 02:47:PM »
but he could of got in and out therough the open upstairs window using a ladder but not many people who think hes guilty seem to want to look at that theory and i cant see why.