'Only I know what really happened that night'

[Adam]

Earlier in the evening Jeremy, Julie, Brett and Liz had gone to dinner.

The talk was mainly about the type of car and jet ski he was going to buy. Together with plans to buy a bar or restaraunt (loved farming).

He later told Liz his life would be very different after the deaths. It was now a lot less likely he would be marrying Julie.

[Adam]

How would Jeremy know Sheila was 'going in the nut house' ? No one else knew.

He was not on speaking terms with June, had robbed from Neville and lived miles away from Sheila. Thought Colin Caffell would know beforehand. 

[lookout]

Put a sock in it.

[Jan]

Is this from Wilkes´ book? Sounds like it.
If you can dig this out from Lis´s statements, if I can see it in her words, I will discuss it, Not with quotes from an author who was not there.

Yes lets have a look at the ancient document . From the time it happened.

[Alias]

How would Jeremy know Sheila was 'going in the nut house' ? No one else knew.

He was not on speaking terms with June, had robbed from Neville and lived miles away from Sheila. Thought Colin Caffell would know beforehand.

I don´t know if he ever said that - it is from a book. He probably didn´t.

[Adam]

Wilkes's book said he interviewed everyone. Except Julie.

That would include Brett. Who was with Jeremy a lot after arriving into England, just after the massacre for (hopefully) a long jolly up.

[Jan]

How would Jeremy know Sheila was 'going in the nut house' ? No one else knew.

He was not on speaking terms with June, had robbed from Neville and lived miles away from Sheila. Thought Colin Caffell would know beforehand.

So you are saying that is a fact ? How would you know?

You are resorting to sarcasm as usual . Show us a source that Sheila was due to be hospitalised ( again) then we might believe you . the book is not the source

[Adam]

So you are saying that is a fact ? How would you know?

You are resorting to sarcasm as usual . Show us a source that Sheila was due to be hospitalised ( again) then we might believe you . the book is not the source

There is no source. Jeremy was lying.

[lookout]

There is no source. Jeremy was lying.

He's where you want him to be,so what's your problem ? What more do you want ?

[JackiePreece]

Adam
Seek help for your attitude
It's disgraceful
Now I know why I haven't and won't read any of the books

[lookout]

He's one of those horrible vindictive individuals Jackie. Nasty,nasty.

[Adam]

The family thought Sheila was going back to London. But I am the only one who knew she was going in the nut house'. Said Jeremy. 

'Nut house' ? Good to see Jeremy not speaking ill of the (recently) dead.

[lookout]

 That's one of your ugly phrases,not Jeremys'.

[maggie]

The family thought Sheila was going back to London. But I am the only one who knew she was going in the nut house'. Said Jeremy.

'Nut house' ? Good to see Jeremy not speaking ill of the (recently) dead.

Jeremy was quoted or misquoted as having said 'nut house' we have no idea this was a direct quote at all.  If he did  say 'nut house' most of the population back in the 1980s used that or similar expressions, certainly in their early 20s. It may not have been politically correct but it was certainly not evidence pointing to Jeremy Bamber's guilt .

[Jan]

I dont know why Adam has to keep on repeating these derogatory terms as if it proves something. If you check the one original notebook from the day he does not say this. And this quote is hearsay from a book - so possibly may not even be true .

A man is not supposed to be tried on his character - he is supposed to be tried on facts.

It seems to me that by repeating these terms over and over again Adam is trying to make some sort of point .

Perhaps he would like to clarify what that point is?