Did Jeremy wear a wet suit for the massacre ?

[lookout]

 You're right,April. As long as he's seen to be getting away with his " bad attitude ",he'll continue,and so will we,rightly or wrongly.

[Jan]

I tell you what - if Adam is touting the bike and wetsuit theory again - then I will tout the idea that it was perfectly possible for

1) Sheila to have showered and changed whilst the police were outside - after all the clothes she wore before changing into her nightdress have never been examined
2) It was possible that the dog licked her hands and feet after she died.


Same theory - prove me wrong.

[nugnug]

how do you know he wore anything adam maybe he was naked.

[susan]

nugnug watched a true story on tv where a son and his friend killed the sons parents for the money he would receive.  Police could find no forensic evidence they had removed all their clothes battered them to death then showered got dressed and went back to their own home. They were found guilty ages later and sentenced to life.

[nugnug]

dont you think it says somthing about a conviction if your still theorizing about how they might of done it 30 years later.

[Jan]

nugnug watched a true story on tv where a son and his friend killed the sons parents for the money he would receive.  Police could find no forensic evidence they had removed all their clothes battered them to death then showered got dressed and went back to their own home. They were found guilty ages later and sentenced to life.

did they tell all their friends that they had done it though? I bet if they went to all that planning they did not make that stupid mistake

[susan]

Hahaha they told nobody but they thought they were clever but not quite clever enough. Went on a spending spree never went to the Memorial Service and their behaviour was quite odd but they were caught in the end.

[lookout]

dont you think it says somthing about a conviction if your still theorizing about how they might of done it 30 years later.

You're telling me.

[Alias]

dont you think it says somthing about a conviction if your still theorizing about how they might of done it 30 years later.

Yes - and even more telling that a number of people use so much time hammering on about his guilt. Why? He IS in prison, he GOT the highest sentence possible. What are they trying to obtain that they havent got already?

[Mr. Gee]

Yes - and even more telling that a number of people use so much time hammering on about his guilt. Why? He IS in prison, he GOT the highest sentence possible. What are they trying to obtain that they havent got already?

I can't help suspecting (probably wrongly?) that the family are saying far more than they profess to say through these over zealous guilters on here? Can't say it is true of JL because Vic made it very clear that they do not like him and even warned him to stay away from the farm. But the almore paranoid others? Perhaps? But then again perhaps not?

[Alias]

I can't help suspecting (probably wrongly?) that the family are saying far more than they profess to say through these over zealous guilters on here? Can't say it is true of JL because Vic made it very clear that they do not like him and even warned him to stay away from the farm. But the almore paranoid others? Perhaps? But then again perhaps not?

I think it could just be that there are so many unclear aspects of the case (yeah, yeah, skippy, save your breath, I won´t be reading it). that people are in reality trying to convince themselves.

[susan]

Mr Gee just reading your post who is JL should know but I don't

[maggie]

Mr Gee just reading your post who is JL should know but I don't

  you are funny susie 

[susan]

HaHaHa Maggie maybe stupid would be more fitting 

[lookout]

 John Lewis ?