The proposed purchase of a Porsche by the appellant

[Mr. Gee]

Thinking irraitonally in order to try to pretend Jeremy is innocent woudl make me a fool.

There you go again. Thinking that I believe Bamber to be innocent just because I don't agree with your scenario. If you don't mind me saying so scipio, but that does speak rather loudly of your egotism.

[scipio_usmc]

There you go again. Thinking that I believe Bamber to be innocent just because I don't agree with your scenario. If you don't mind me saying so scipio, but that does speak rather loudly of your egotism.

Your own past posts attacking anyone who asserts Jeremy is guilty, saying you wish you were guilty so he coudl be innocent, and other such nonsense betrays your position.  Trying to claim you are unbiased is a total waste of time.

In th emeantime anytime you are challenged for evidence to back up your posiiton you cna't do so.  Not one person here who doubt's Jeremy's guilt has been able to put together a rational explanation of why they believe such.

Not a single person has put together anythign valid to actually challenge the evidence just irrational dismissal of the evidnec ei use dto try to suggest he is innocent.

I cna and have posted an extremely long and detailed basis for his guit.  No one here has dented such or even attempted to try. No one can do the same as far as explaining their opinions.  Thisngs ar eposted in piecemeal only and always fall apart upon scrutiny.  That is the reality.

[Mr. Gee]

Your own past posts attacking anyone who asserts Jeremy is guilty, saying you wish you were guilty so he coudl be innocent, and other such nonsense betrays your position.  Trying to claim you are unbiased is a total waste of time.

In th emeantime anytime you are challenged for evidence to back up your posiiton you cna't do so.  Not one person here who doubt's Jeremy's guilt has been able to put together a rational explanation of why they believe such.

Not a single person has put together anythign valid to actually challenge the evidence just irrational dismissal of the evidnec ei use dto try to suggest he is innocent.

I cna and have posted an extremely long and detailed basis for his guit.  No one here has dented such or even attempted to try. No one can do the same as far as explaining their opinions.  Thisngs ar eposted in piecemeal only and always fall apart upon scrutiny.  That is the reality.

What on earth are you talking about now? Show me where I said I wish I were guilty so  he could be innocent. You really are losing the plot scipio. You listen too much to the idle gossip of fools.
Correction, no one has dented your scenario because you think that only you are right and everyone else is wrong. Your ears are stopped and you cannot hear anyone else because your own ego is drowning out their voices.

[lookout]

Sounds more like a ruddy great chip on the shoulder rather than a debate. I'd question that too !!
The same with Adam. Maybe they're next door to each other in a correction cell.

[scipio_usmc]

What on earth are you talking about now? Show me where I said I wish I were guilty so  he could be innocent. You really are losing the plot scipio. You listen too much to the idle gossip of fools.
Correction, no one has dented your scenario because you think that only you are right and everyone else is wrong. Your ears are stopped and you cannot hear anyone else because your own ego is drowning out their voices.

I'm talking about posts you made under other names.  You have had so many over the years and even used more than one the same time which helped give the impresison of false support by having an alias come to your aid.

You act like someone with a split personaity and constantly contradict yourself.  A great example of tha tis how you posted police followed ordinary procedures in waiting to go inside until after making the efofrt to try to talk Sheila out but then only 2 weeks later did a 180 when a newbie (who some thing was really just an old poster using a new alias) alleged that police should have gone in right away.  You praised his post and completely abandoned your prior claims about proper police procedure for standoffs.

I already highlighted various quotes from you in the past showing your bias and your ending of your Graham acocunt shows it as well.  You claimed you were leaving because you had no ability to refute the evidenc eoffered to estbalish Jeremy's guilt which means you declared your purosoes was to establish his innocence but since you couldn't you were leaivng.

Trying to pretend you are unbiased is a complete waste of time you are not fooling anyway especially not fooling the people you are trying to snow with your BS claims of being unbiased.

[Patti]

I'm talking about posts you made under other names.  You have had so many over the years and even used more than one the same time which helped give the impresison of false support by having an alias come to your aid.

You act like someone with a split personaity and constantly contradict yourself.  A great example of tha tis how you posted police followed ordinary procedures in waiting to go inside until after making the efofrt to try to talk Sheila out but then only 2 weeks later did a 180 when a newbie (who some thing was really just an old poster using a new alias) alleged that police should have gone in right away.  You praised his post and completely abandoned your prior claims about proper police procedure for standoffs.

I already highlighted various quotes from you in the past showing your bias and your ending of your Graham acocunt shows it as well.  You claimed you were leaving because you had no ability to refute the evidenc eoffered to estbalish Jeremy's guilt which means you declared your purosoes was to establish his innocence but since you couldn't you were leaivng.

Trying to pretend you are unbiased is a complete waste of time you are not fooling anyway especially not fooling the people you are trying to snow with your BS claims of being unbiased.

Scipio

I have been very lenient with you over the past few days even though I have advised you to stick to debating, but it appears that you get rather personal at times. How many more times do I have to warn you before I take action and give you a ban? 

I shall have to consider what I am to do before the end of the evening.

Hopefully, things might improve.

[Mr. Gee]

I'm talking about posts you made under other names.  You have had so many over the years and even used more than one the same time which helped give the impresison of false support by having an alias come to your aid.

You act like someone with a split personaity and constantly contradict yourself.  A great example of tha tis how you posted police followed ordinary procedures in waiting to go inside until after making the efofrt to try to talk Sheila out but then only 2 weeks later did a 180 when a newbie (who some thing was really just an old poster using a new alias) alleged that police should have gone in right away.  You praised his post and completely abandoned your prior claims about proper police procedure for standoffs.

I already highlighted various quotes from you in the past showing your bias and your ending of your Graham acocunt shows it as well.  You claimed you were leaving because you had no ability to refute the evidenc eoffered to estbalish Jeremy's guilt which means you declared your purosoes was to establish his innocence but since you couldn't you were leaivng.

Trying to pretend you are unbiased is a complete waste of time you are not fooling anyway especially not fooling the people you are trying to snow with your BS claims of being unbiased.

You haven't been here years so you are going by the lies of others. Go on show me those posts. You can't because I've never said it. I'm trying to fool nobody. How can I possible fool him who is a fool already? You're just trying to be insulting. Hardly an honest man in my book. You can't win me over so you resort to insults. Only a thug and a wicked man does that. My conversations with you are at an end as you do not conduct yourself as a gentleman. Good night little man.

[Mr. Gee]

Scipio

I have been very lenient with you over the past few days even though I have advised you to stick to debating, but it appears that you get rather personal at times. How many more times do I have to warn you before I take action and give you a ban? 

I shall have to consider what I am to do before the end of the evening.

Hopefully, things might improve.

Ban the bugger Patti. He isn't worthy to be in a civilized society.

[Patti]

Ban the bugger Patti. He isn't worthy to be in a civilized society.

We shall see Mr Gee. I do not like the idea of banning people, but in order to give the forum some respite I might consider it towards the end of the evening if things do not improve. Meanwhile can we try to be fair, the best way we can.

I find its always better to make an evaluation rather than just hit the ban button....Not long since been on Mr Gee so give me time to read through some of the posts....

I shall be back....