Just to clarify my position on the Bamber case. I am not a Bamber supporter I am a free thinker on this and a believer in justice. The accusation by some people whose thinking has been polarized to that they cannot see except in one direction alone reminds me of a story that was born out of the troubles in Northern Ireland. A man was held up at gunpoint and asked, "Are you a Catholic or a Protestant". The man relied, " I'm an Atheist". To which came the confused reply, "Yes, but are you Catholic Atheist, or a Protestant Atheist?"
These people remind me of those gunmen. The believe I must be one or the other? In other words if I do not hold to certain views of theirs then it is obvious that I must be a Bamber supporter even though I say I am not. Then they are further confused when I ask questions and have doubts about Bamber and so they come to the conclusion that I am lying and must still be a Bamber supporter.
I am posting this not only to try and clarify where I am in relation to Bamber's guilt or innocence, but also to highlight the inability for these people to look at this case with an open mind and having an open mind, to look at the evidence from all sides instead of having a closed mind on the subject. This I believe is the only way to look at this case fairly and without prejudice. Sadly it is the position of so few on this forum? All I am doing is trying to keep a balanced mind in all this.
This is hogwash.
You support Jeremy at every turn for irraitonal reaosns, attack those who beleive the evidence proving his guilt and betray your bias reguarly.
If you were the unbiased, rational freethinker you purport to be then you would face there is no way Sheila could have:
1) killed herself or anyone else without getting GSR on her gown and hand that pulled the trigger
2) could have killed her her mother and father without getting their blood in the form of high velocity impact spatter on her clothing and body as well as medium impact spatter on her clothing and body from Nevill and blood to have transferred from the weapon to her gown as well and her hands to have not left fingerprints in blood on the weapon unless she was wearing gloves
3) Moved her blody flat after she died
4) placed the bible in a pool of her own wet blood that formed after she died
5) removed the moderator and put it away in the closet after she was dead
There is consierably more evidence proving Jeremy's guilt but any raitonal freethinker can't get aorund this evidence. The defense had no experts who could help them get around this evidence either at trial or even now.
Instead of being an unbiased freethinker you have decided to pretend that somehow the above evidence was planted and fabricated though you have not a shred of evidence to suggest such actually happened you just choose to beleive it because you don't want to face Jeremy's guilt.
The same can be said for everyone hear who quesitons his guilt. Despite months of prodding you all for rational bases for your positions and evidence to support same you have all demonstrated no ration basis for your claims just bias built upon deception and distortions that run from distortions of fact to distortions of legal principles to try to pretend the prosecution failed to meet the legal burden required by law.
All those who question his guilt who are honest would admit they are going on blind faith nothing more because that is the relaity of it.
