What interesting comments at the bottom Jan?
Like this one from Wullie Beck?
"Experts have now concluded there was no evidence of blood in the furrows showing Susan May never murdered her Aunt Hilda.
What is worse for me is the fact CCRC used a disgraced expert in the Mckie case not to investigate the fingerprint evidence in Sue’s case.
Peter Swann confirmed it was her fingerprint in her Aunts blood.
Experts now conclude there is no blood.
Another disturbing aspect of Susan May’s case for me is the fact there was never any tests done to ascertain if there was blood let alone Hilda Marchbank’s blood.
No Blood-No Case To Answer.
CCRC were warned about Peter Swann by myself bvut they chose to ignore my complaints re Fingerprint Enquiry Scotland and continued to Use Peter Swann as a credible expert"
No disrespect toward Susan May,
but Peter Swan was also the fingerprint experts in the case I'm familiar with - so that won't help Wullie Beck's argument imo....
There is a comment from a Jonathan King , but are you saying Peter Swan was a finger print expert in a Essex murder trial . as well as one in Manchester and Scotland ?
Did Swan find SH fingerprint's at the scene ?
I'd quoted the comment made by Wullie Beck therefore not sure why you've referred to Jonathon King?
Re the SH case - Peter Swan found several sets of fingerprints unaccounted for, which allowed room for argument from the defence and the subsequent innocence campaign....
The unaccounted fingerprints added more weight to the above argument.
