Jeremy's OS says the police tried to frame him because they made a mistake on the night.
Believing Sheila was dead when she was still alive. The raid team not noticing Sheila moving upstairs from the kitchen after they entered WHF, and too ashamed to admit their mistake. So framed Jeremy one month later.
Another poster, an author this week said Jeremy manages the OS.
If the police were so ashamed of their mistake, why did they spend the first month supporting the murder/suicide theory ? It would risk highlighting their mistake.
There is no record of the defence making this accusation at trial. So it seems no one, apart from a few raid team officers, were aware that Sheila was alive in the kitchen and moved upstairs after one shot. So cannot see this as a reason for the police changing stance after one month, dangerously trying to frame an innocent man.
Perhaps the police changed stance after Julie approached her and the silencer tests came back. Both happening around the same time.
I know for a fact that Essex Police are not liked by the Metropoliton Police. Was it Harrison, or someone else who said that Essex Police are very divided and that there is not much unity between them? I can't remember who said that? But if that was so in those days then one can make certain deductions as to why they could have ended up blaming Jeremy for a crime he did not do?
I have mentioned this before, but I'll say it again anyway. The original case was not based upon all the scenarios and so called evidence that we often see posted on this forum these days. In fact everyone though, even two of the jury members that Bamber was convicted upon the most flimsey of evidence.
Now some way arguse that now we have a better understanding of things that Bamber looks even moe guilty. But no. The reason he apparently looks guilty today is simply because of the many scenarios and assumptions that some have made concerning him. One example is their almost sycophantic attitude concerning Mugfords evidence and the dogmatic attitude and ear stopping that they exercise to ever consider that she would lie. That together with their utmost religious belief and blind faith they have in the silencer evidence and their supposed belief in the notion that no one could possibly fake such a thing. Add that to the belief that not only the notion that Mugford would not lie, but the belief that nearly everything that Jeremy said was a lie.
So once again he is found guilty by this modern day lynch mob on the basis of manufactured evidence and presumption.
