The Threat.

[Mr. Gee]

So if he regards Jackie as such a highly valued member of staff, why isn't her boss suing someone for saying he said something he didn't?

And likewise if she did give him vital information such as a password to the database or other sensitive stuff why hasn't he sacked her? If she is hanging onto her job "by a thread" as PH suggests then I doubt very much that she would be posting on here?

[Mr. Gee]

It was basically an invitation to look at the magazines published.  It did not afford access to the company's database or lists of clients and email addresses.  It was actually quite harmless although I agree that it was unwise and it could potentially have been misunderstood.  I would certainly not have done that.

Which apparently is was according to Caroline. I didn't actually see that post, but I think Caroline is justified in what she posted about it. A simple yes or no by Jackie (although I fear that she would not have been believed?) would have sufficed instead of us all being taken for a ride around the galaxy.

[John]

And likewise if she did give him vital information such as a password to the database or other sensitive stuff why hasn't he sacked her? If she is hanging onto her job "by a thread" as PH suggests then I doubt very much that she would be posting on here?

Serves her right for having anything to do with such a pompous .....

[JackiePreece]

Jan I was not asking for an apology to that post but in her email to Mason Doyle she did her best to discredit me by warning him about me.  Mason Doyle knows me well enough to take no notice but I thought she was not justified in doing that as I have never  been disrespectful to her and a simple sorry would have sufficed I was not wanting flowers or chocolates.  The other post was horrendous but the Mods acted very quickly and removed it I have no complaints at all about them and my post came over slightly different than I meant but I did what any decent person would do and apologise.   

Well if you know your mate Mason Doyle well enough ask if he was paid for the article and why he lied to my company and the newspaper

I will not have Jeremy discredited by the likes of him
The letter charade is ridiculous and most of us on here think it's a stunt

[Jane]

And likewise if she did give him vital information such as a password to the database or other sensitive stuff why hasn't he sacked her? If she is hanging onto her job "by a thread" as PH suggests then I doubt very much that she would be posting on here?

I guess because on a scale of 1 to 10 of national importance/interest this forum rates 1.

[Mr. Gee]

No I did not see the post , as obviously it was removed - which is the right thing to do. And I have no problems with how the mods reacted when Adam insinuated I wrote the letter. I was just commenting that sometimes - on all sides  all it takes is sorry when someone has been upset - and then a ban would not even be necessary.

I believe that Adam insisted that that was a joke on his part? But personally I thought it was a strange joke. I can see how certain stuff can be misunderstood on forums, especially as we don't know most of the people posting.

[John]

Well if you know your mate Mason Doyle well enough ask if he was paid for the article and why he lied to my company and the newspaper

I will not have Jeremy discredited by the likes of him
The letter charade is ridiculous and most of us on here think it's a stunt

Course its a stunt, Jerry ain't going anywhere.

[Mr. Gee]

Serves her right for having anything to do with such a pompous .....

So it serves her right does it? If you got your wallet pinched would it serve you right for getting involved with a pickpocket?

[lookout]

Course its a stunt, Jerry ain't going anywhere.

How do you know  that " Jerry ain't going anywhere ",John ?

[Mr. Gee]

I guess because on a scale of 1 to 10 of national importance/interest this forum rates 1.

Not where bosses are concerned. Any bad publicity is taken very seriously. I knew a teacher who was sacked for expressing her views about the school where she worked. The internet is counted as a very powerful medium by bosses the proof of that is looking at just how many people use and abuse the internet.

[Mr. Gee]

Course its a stunt, Jerry ain't going anywhere.

Did you know Jeremy by any chance? Because his sister Sheila used to call him Jerry.

[Patti]

Not where bosses are concerned. Any bad publicity is taken very seriously. I knew a teacher who was sacked for expressing her views about the school where she worked. The internet is counted as a very powerful medium by bosses the proof of that is looking at just how many people use and abuse the internet.

It certainly is Mr Gee and I came close to losing my job. Lookout will confirm this.   

[lookout]

Did you know Jeremy by any chance? Because his sister Sheila used to call him Jerry.

So did JM, Mr G.

[Patti]

? Are you drunk Adam?

No he is being himself....He normally talks like that 

[Mr. Gee]

So did JM, Mr G.

Yes indeed. It is usually a term used bythose who actually know the person concerned.