The Threat.

[Neil]

what ever you believe about the emails and pms and the interpretation of them,  the forum debate was the type of thing that happens ALL the time on forums . Many of us have been the subject of threats ( me for example as you know being reported to the police for aiding you in an argument)

But I have seen nothing that justified the naming and implication of Jackie and Ngb in the press.

How would you have felt if it was you , in the same article about a death threat?

I still feel that old arguments are colouring opinion about what has happened.

Unless I have missed something I can not see the justification for publication of that article

Hi Jan,  that's a great post and I wholeheartedly agree.

[Patti]

Her BOSS says she almost lost her job. It's a quote from her boss.  If you can't see that it's because you don't want to.

Yes I know Mat....Its not a case that I don't want to see it, I know that is what was said in the article.  I'm not denying that. Do you think I am?

I think you are misunderstanding me..

Based on what the article said and what her boss had said is not what is in contention here. The article is solely responsible for her to come close to losing her job. Or is it that she (forgive the word she) has never come close to losing her job at all....Is the article misleading or has she been really reprimanded.  If it is the latter then surely the article its self has caused unnecessary stress and worry towards her. It matters not that she is claiming otherwise, the fact remains.  :D   

[Patti]

what ever you believe about the emails and pms and the interpretation of them,  the forum debate was the type of thing that happens ALL the time on forums . Many of us have been the subject of threats ( me for example as you know being reported to the police for aiding you in an argument)

But I have seen nothing that justified the naming and implication of Jackie and Ngb in the press.

How would you have felt if it was you , in the same article about a death threat?

I still feel that old arguments are colouring opinion about what has happened.

Unless I have missed something I can not see the justification for publication of that article

I totally agree with you Jan. A really sensible post, but then again all your posts are that way inclined. 

[JackiePreece]

Thank you Jan, Patti and Neil

Since I first started to publicise this case on Twitter I have had so many bad things done to me and said about and things set up to make me look bad that it seems I am some kind of threat to the PEOPLE who want to keep Jeremy in prison

But this time it's been taken to a whole new level

I believe PH gave the paper false information and then the paper printed the wrong information

Maybe SOMEDAY panicked when they saw where I worked

Someone was definately determined to get me sacked
First the numerous phone calls to my company and then the newspaper article

Who could lose the most if Jeremy's conviction was overturned?
Where was the letter sent from?


Once again someone is determined to sabotage Jeremy's next attempt to get his case to the appeal court

It's disgraceful and it's disgraceful that Ngb has been dragged into things again
It must grate on a number of people that Ngb is at the end of the phone whenever Jeremy needs him

[guest7363]

Yes I know Mat....Its not a case that I don't want to see it, I know that is what was said in the article.  I'm not denying that. Do you think I am?

I think you are misunderstanding me..

Based on what the article said and what her boss had said is not what is in contention here. The article is solely responsible for her to come close to losing her job. Or is it that she (forgive the word she) has never come close to losing her job at all....Is the article misleading or has she been really reprimanded.  If it is the latter then surely the article its self has caused unnecessary stress and worry towards her. It matters not that she is claiming otherwise, the fact remains.  :D

Would you not have to produce a written warning letter if you had been reprimanded patti, when Jackie clearly states she had a letter saying she was an asset after the article was published?

[guest154]

Would you not have to produce a written warning letter if you had been reprimanded patti, when Jackie clearly states she had a letter saying she was an asset after the article was published?

She seems to be basically saying that what her boss told the newspaper isn't true. 

[guest7363]

She seems to be basically saying that what her boss told the newspaper isn't true. 

Thats how i read it as well Matt

[JackiePreece]

She seems to be basically saying that what her boss told the newspaper isn't true. 

No I didn't, it's how you interpret things, how many times do you think a company needs to be rung before they get fed up? you were not in the meetings,  I totally understand why they were fed up

Obviously the whole thing (the lies) was investigated

I have said as much as I am saying because a solicitor will be given everything and I will take their advice

[Patti]

Would you not have to produce a written warning letter if you had been reprimanded patti, when Jackie clearly states she had a letter saying she was an asset after the article was published?

Hi Justice

It depend who you work for and their policies.  Where I worked in government there are two avenues. One is a written warning and the other is dismissal. There are no verbal warnings. However, some companies do adapt to a verbal before a written then a final..It depends on their own guidance and polices.

It might be that Jackie is an asset to the company...to be fair it is not for us to scrutinize.  I would say to Jackie this...Please be aware of what you write and stay mindful and I would recommend that to anyone whether they think they are anonymous or not...There is always someone out there Justice, to make your life a misery because you made a mistake....

Some people thrive on taking matters away from the forums in order to lose peoples their jobs. They stalk you, get to know who you are then bingo! 

[Jan]

She seems to be basically saying that what her boss told the newspaper isn't true. 

Well maybe he decided after talking to her that her job was not at threat?

I bet they were not happy , for whatever reason , of having their company name associated with the article. Perhaps that was a gut initial reaction and then they changed their minds.

I don't really see that's any of our business.

[guest154]

I don't really see that's any of our business.

Well it has been printed in the press, and Jackie has spoken of it. The article is also being used to try and damage Mason who was a member of this forum - and now the people are nit-picking the article to try and dirty MD's name... yet these are the same people that had basically thrown themselves at him to sit in his lap when he first came to the forum.

[guest7363]

Hi Justice

It depend who you work for and their policies.  Where I worked in government there are two avenues. One is a written warning and the other is dismissal. There are no verbal warnings. However, some companies do adapt to a verbal before a written then a final..It depends on their own guidance and polices.

It might be that Jackie is an asset to the company...to be fair it is not for us to scrutinize.  I would say to Jackie this...Please be aware of what you write and stay mindful and I would recommend that to anyone whether they think they are anonymous or not...There is always someone out there Justice, to make your life a misery because you made a mistake....

Some people thrive on taking matters away from the forums in order to lose peoples their jobs. They stalk you, get to know who you are then bingo! 

Thanks and good post Patti

[guest7363]

Well it has been printed in the press, and Jackie has spoken of it. The article is also being used to try and damage Mason who was a member of this forum - and now the people are nit-picking the article to try and dirty MD's name... yet these are the same people that had basically thrown themselves at him to sit in his lap when he first came to the forum.

Good post Matt, if its none of our buisness dont post it on a forum to discuss just do it.

[Patti]

Thanks and good post Patti

Thank you Justice. Do you play bingo?

[guest7363]

Thank you Justice. Do you play bingo?

Been to Mecca a few times but dont like it? Am i leading into something lol.