The Threat.

[Caroline]

Caroline I have said myself that I do not believe that there is not an injunction. But you cannot deny the fact that all this has originated from Harrison himself. He is the person of interest here, nobody else.

The idea of an injunction came from here but personally, I don't understand all the speculation, just wait until next August and buy the book if you're interested, if not - then don't. PH's profession is as an author - he didn't come here to make friends, he came to help with his research. He doesn't really owe any of us anything - me included.

[lookout]

PH states that it's a controversial new book looking at several areas of crucial evidence which includes why the murder weapon was moved several times while expert forensics were photographing " in the aftermath of the bloodbath ". Jeremy had complained that police had contaminated the actual crime scene and the telephone log which wasn't used at the trial,which appears to support the claim that it was Sheila who'd carried out the shooting.

PH goes on to say that it's not for him to say that Jeremy is innocent, but the conviction is unsound. "There has been a MOJ,of that I'm sure ".

He had been in touch with Jeremy on a weekly basis last year,as well as interviewing friends and relatives.

[Mr. Gee]

The idea of an injunction came from here but personally, I don't understand all the speculation, just wait until next August and buy the book if you're interested, if not - then don't. PH's profession is as an author - he didn't come here to make friends, he came to help with his research. He doesn't really owe any of us anything - me included.

I think we have no choice but wait til next August, as this August when the book was due to be published has come and gone. Personally I for one will not hold my breath over it and if it is eventually published I may or may not buy it if I haven't lost all interest in it by then? I might even be dead by the time it's published? Who cares?

[Jane]

I think we have no choice but wait til next August, as this August when the book was due to be published has come and gone. Personally I for one will not hold my breath over it and if it is eventually published I may or may not buy it if I haven't lost all interest in it by then? I might even be dead by the time it's published? Who cares?

Grahame, if it hadn't been for all the Hoo Haa that's been going on here, I'd have forgotten all about it

[Caroline]

I think we have no choice but wait til next August, as this August when the book was due to be published has come and gone. Personally I for one will not hold my breath over it and if it is eventually published I may or may not buy it if I haven't lost all interest in it by then? I might even be dead by the time it's published? Who cares?

Quite a lot of people given all of the speculation. But those are the options, buy it or don't buy it.

[Mr. Gee]

Grahame, if it hadn't been for all the Hoo Haa that's been going on here, I'd have forgotten all about it

Me too April.

[Mr. Gee]

Quite a lot of people given all of the speculation. But those are the options, buy it or don't buy it.

Well I don't think it is the actual book they're speculating about but all the rubbish about authorities trying to stop him and the alleged death threats that people are arguing about?

[Neil]

The notion of an injunction sounds ridiculous and as if invented to garner attention to try to suggest the book will be worth reading because it is so groundbreaking an injunction had been declared. 

I don't wonder whether it will ever be published because of some alleged injunction I wonder about lack of interest or the finished product being poor.

My thoughts exactly.

[lookout]

What can he write about that hasn't already been written ?

[Jane]

What can he write about that hasn't already been written ?

I'm beginning to feel as if there's an undercurrent of old fashioned cattiness running through this topic. I can remember back to when MD/PH first joined and how excited we were at the thought of a new book. Now it seems nobody can find a good word to say about it.

[scipio_usmc]

I'm beginning to feel as if there's an undercurrent of old fashioned cattiness running through this topic. I can remember back to when MD/PH first joined and how excited we were at the thought of a new book. Now it seems nobody can find a good word to say about it.

Most such people were probably supporters excited at the prospect of another pro-Bamber book who changed their view upon it no longer being pro-Bamber.

Unless the book will contain excerpts of significant testimony it probably won't add anything not seen before so will not be very exciting from the prospect of someone who accepts the existing evidence in the case.

[lookout]

I'm beginning to feel as if there's an undercurrent of old fashioned cattiness running through this topic. I can remember back to when MD/PH first joined and how excited we were at the thought of a new book. Now it seems nobody can find a good word to say about it.

No,not catiness.  If you were to see some of my posts back then, I didn't have as much to say as everyone else did. Mine was more cautious optimism rather than catiness,because I was puzzled then as to what he could possibly write about that hadn't already been written.

[Jan]

I'm beginning to feel as if there's an undercurrent of old fashioned cattiness running through this topic. I can remember back to when MD/PH first joined and how excited we were at the thought of a new book. Now it seems nobody can find a good word to say about it.

personally I think its more to do with the newspaper article and the accusations it made and forum members being drawn into the article.

If he had come on here ( which he did in a way ) and infer he had changed stance on the outcome of his research I don't think there would have been much fuss tbh.

[Caroline]

personally I think its more to do with the newspaper article and the accusations it made and forum members being drawn into the article.

If he had come on here ( which he did in a way ) and infer he had changed stance on the outcome of his research I don't think there would have been much fuss tbh.

Jan, he came here as a professional author and everyone knew that - no one has to admit to what stance they have. Some choose to but whatever people believe is their own business and for them to reveal or not.

[Jane]

Most such people were probably supporters excited at the prospect of another pro-Bamber book who changed their view upon it no longer being pro-Bamber.

Unless the book will contain excerpts of significant testimony it probably won't add anything not seen before so will not be very exciting from the prospect of someone who accepts the existing evidence in the case.

I think that's a fair assessment.