The Threat.

[Mr. Gee]

I remember my shakespeare here, "A man may smile and smile and be a villian".

[nugnug]

possbly its still the same but with an added thing saying he now thinks jeremys guilty.

i mean changing opinion doesnt neccasrly mean changing the content.

[nugnug]

What I find problematic with this whole thing is that PH and the newspaper basically get away with insinuating that JB is behind this and that you, Jackie, are the "disciple" who sent the letter -  and probably with the blessing of Jeremy´s "protector", NGB.
It is all in very poor taste at least!
NGB said here on the board that Jeremy didn´t have a "name" to protect, so he couldn´t do anything. Does that mean that I can make up a story about Jeremy, say, claim he is a pedophile and molested children before he went to prison and go to a newspaper with it - and Jeremy can´t do anything about it because he is in prison?
Surely even lifers have a right not to be unjustly defamed?

mind you jackie and nggb might still have a case for libel

[JackiePreece]

What I find problematic with this whole thing is that PH and the newspaper basically get away with insinuating that JB is behind this and that you, Jackie, are the "disciple" who sent the letter -  and probably with the blessing of Jeremy´s "protector", NGB.
It is all in very poor taste at least!
NGB said here on the board that Jeremy didn´t have a "name" to protect, so he couldn´t do anything. Does that mean that I can make up a story about Jeremy, say, claim he is a pedophile and molested children before he went to prison and go to a newspaper with it - and Jeremy can´t do anything about it because he is in prison?
Surely even lifers have a right not to be unjustly defamed?

Thanks Alias

I find it extraordinary the anger and bad behaviour we have seen just because the author has been exposed as someone who is writing a book about Jeremy's guilt

What was the reason for?

[nugnug]

i cant  understand the reason for anyone to do that i mean hes bring out a book from a guilty stance hes not the first person to do that so who cares that much.

same as if he was writting from an innocent point of view who cares i mean nobody tried to bully lomax so why him.

the only reason i can think is to try and frame somebody else.

[lookout]

What I find problematic with this whole thing is that PH and the newspaper basically get away with insinuating that JB is behind this and that you, Jackie, are the "disciple" who sent the letter -  and probably with the blessing of Jeremy´s "protector", NGB.
It is all in very poor taste at least!
NGB said here on the board that Jeremy didn´t have a "name" to protect, so he couldn´t do anything. Does that mean that I can make up a story about Jeremy, say, claim he is a pedophile and molested children before he went to prison and go to a newspaper with it - and Jeremy can´t do anything about it because he is in prison?
Surely even lifers have a right not to be unjustly defamed?

You can feel the bitterness and jealousy in just those two phrases.
Jeremy can't defend himself against this slander/libel and whoever wrote that,knows this.It's so cowardly,but so very childish at the same time,as no normal balanced adult would write in this way.

[lookout]

I don't care if he's got glowing reports from the Dalai Lama himself, I for one do not trust him after reading that article. Sounds like someone who would sell his own grandmother for 30 pieces of silver?

I agree. Why didn't he just overlook it and put it down to it having been a crank/crackpot.?

[Jane]

You can feel the bitterness and jealousy in just those two phrases.
Jeremy can't defend himself against this slander/libel and whoever wrote that,knows this.It's so cowardly,but so very childish at the same time,as no normal balanced adult would write in this way.

Lookout, what exactly to you think he's bitter about and jealous of? I very much doubt that he wants to be either a "disciple" or a "protector" of Jeremy, and I feel perfectly certain that you've been around this forum long enough to know that we all regard ourselves as being "normal, balanced adults". Others may disagree.

[guest7363]

You can feel the bitterness and jealousy in just those two phrases.
Jeremy can't defend himself against this slander/libel and whoever wrote that,knows this.It's so cowardly,but so very childish at the same time,as no normal balanced adult would write in this way.

Jealous of what?

[lookout]

Well,c'mon,can't you detect a certain inadequacy in the writer ? That answers your question,I think.
Otherwise why resort to it ?

[JackiePreece]

Lookout I have been thinking out this a lot.
Wouldn't it be funny if there was a way to make a claim against the article writer but could donate the whole lot to Jeremy's campaign for freedom
Who would have the last laugh then

[Adam]

Crank or not.

Only Jeremy or a well informed supporter would know the contents of a book not due for release until 2015.

[lookout]

Crank or not.

Only Jeremy or a well informed supporter would know the contents of a book not due for release until 2015.

Lies,lies and damned lies.

[Mr. Gee]

Lookout I have been thinking out this a lot.
Wouldn't it be funny if there was a way to make a claim against the article writer but could donate the whole lot to Jeremy's campaign for freedom
Who would have the last laugh then

Heck no. I'd use the money to buy a flat.

[Mr. Gee]

Crank or not.

Only Jeremy or a well informed supporter would know the contents of a book not due for release until 2015.

Why and how would ONLY a supporter know? That doesn't make any sense.