The Threat.

[Patti]

they could send you messages on your computer and change files I would have thought.

I don't know Jan, I honestly don't know. i suspect it would take a expert to know if one has been hacked...I just don't know to be honest. How does one prove this had happened? 

[nugnug]

At a guess...It doesn't sound like Mason's book will be popular with a number of elements linked to this case.

The convicted person. 
The star prosecution witness. 
The convicted's wider relatives.
The convicted's campaign team.
Some of Essex Police.
Other authorities or professionals linked with scientific or legal processes.

If you have that wide a range of conflciting and competing parties concerned about your book... and the story itself keeps unwravelling over time, I'm not suprised there have been re-writes and delays.

If it ever gets published I think it will be explosive.

jeremy and the capaghn cant stop the book the realtives and mugford have never been able to stop anything else being published stan jones is dead so he cant.

now who does that leave.

[tyler]

who are the most likely people to know about hacking ? A criminal  and or the police?

just saying - observation - nothing more

Andy Coulson? 
Re: the phone hacking scandal,RB's personal assistant was one of those arrested. She is my sister-in-law's sister.Its a small world isnt it?

[guest7363]

I think he said that  he was talking and getting on with JB as recently as 2014 actually. I never saw him say JB was innocent only that he thought there definitely was a MOJ because of the silencer and other evidence that was presented.

Book cop I'll show Bamber's innocent. That was his headline?

[Jan]

Book cop I'll show Bamber's innocent. That was his headline?

If he was going in with an open mind that was a bit presumptious?

[guest7363]

If he was going in with an open mind that was a bit presumptious?

Certainly was, something positive must have come up for him to change his mind?

[guest7363]

Book cop I'll show Bamber's innocent. That was his headline?

From that to this, But Mr Harrison said his book will "finally bring closure" and prove Bamber's guilt beyond doubt when it is published ahead of the 30th anniversary of the slayings next August. So could the 30th anniversary be the reason like someone said?

[nugnug]

here we are says hes spent 8 years resarching the book.

http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCUQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thefreelibrary.com%2FBook%2Bcop%2BI%27ll%2Bshow%2BBamber%27s%2Binnocent.-a0337437563&ei=LNhKVJ-xJMmP7AaI94CQDA&usg=AFQjCNH1ztW6mILJVQWx1KRV1H85qsfTNQ&sig2=Y7E2Ie_lU7wlZ5Hx0Ky6CQ&bvm=bv.77880786,d.ZGU&cad=rja

[guest7363]

From that to this, But Mr Harrison said his book will "finally bring closure" and prove Bamber's guilt beyond doubt when it is published ahead of the 30th anniversary of the slayings next August. So could the 30th anniversary be the reason for the delay like someone said?

[Mr. Gee]

A virus is different to being hacked i think Patti, i think they call it hijacked when someone gets access to your computer?

Hijacked? Do you think a lot of computers are headed for Cuba?

[JackiePreece]

There won't be any new evidence in any book, I am quite certain of that

The only new evidence that could change things will be held under PII like nearly every other moj case

Authors and writers that make sensational claims are nearly always short of cash

[nugnug]

i dident know he had been looking at the case for 8 years.

[Mr. Gee]

here we are says hes spent 8 years resarching the book.

http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCUQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thefreelibrary.com%2FBook%2Bcop%2BI%27ll%2Bshow%2BBamber%27s%2Binnocent.-a0337437563&ei=LNhKVJ-xJMmP7AaI94CQDA&usg=AFQjCNH1ztW6mILJVQWx1KRV1H85qsfTNQ&sig2=Y7E2Ie_lU7wlZ5Hx0Ky6CQ&bvm=bv.77880786,d.ZGU&cad=rja

Well I'm not sure which road he's going to take, Unsound conviction? Or Bamber proved guilty once and for all?

[Mr. Gee]

There won't be any new evidence in any book, I am quite certain of that

The only new evidence that could change things will be held under PII like nearly every other moj case

Authors and writers that make sensational claims are nearly always short of cash

Or if Muggy recants her testimony? Now that would make a lot of people here look silly wouldn't it?

[nugnug]

so hes spent so 8 years reaserch led him to think it was a possble moj. but in the space of a few months hes changed his mind.