Grahame I was not aware Paul Harrison had attacked you or Jackie. Don't forget I had the story in black and white on Sunday did I post it on the forum NO because I could not see what good it would do. I have said many times I think he had an unfair trial and I know if you thought he was guilty you would not support him. You and jansus were making a joke about him and evidence to prove him guilty after 30 years now quite a number on here think he is innocent as did I so surely you would appreciate evidence that proves his guilt because at this moment in time many of you think he was "set up" and is innocent. Just my opinion as I am entitled to as you are yours. Still cannot understand why this story was brought to this forum nothing but trouble so far. I will now close on the subject as I am not qualified to talk further as I would be speculating. Jackie seems to know what is in the book and according to her he has nothing that can harm Jeremy so things will not change.
The are my views as well and it is evident that you also foresaw the trouble it would cause and alas it has come to pass. I have said on many occasions that if I believed him to be guilty then of course I would never support him. I don't support him now. But I do support the idea of justice and as you can see from some of the posts written by some on here it is quite evident that there are a few who like to accuse the innocent without proof just because it looks like it to them. I must confess I am shocked to realise that there still are people around who will condemn innocent people without proof as you have seen how Jackie has been villified on here today. It is a disgraceful state of affairs to do such a thing especially when it is those very people who claim to deduce the truth from the facts and who also boast to have studied this case and have found Bamber guilty beyond any doubt at all and not only that but condemn Jackie for sending a letter completely without proof at all. I simply cannot get over that. Such an unjust and infair thing to do, just because they don't like her.
As I said before if there is even a million to 1 chance that Bamber is innocent I will search exhaustively and turn things over and over in my mind until I am sure. I try not to think in a shallow way as appears to be the habit of some. One other thing puts me off most of the guilters that I have come across in the past and a few here is the rude and haughty and self righteous way in which they refer to those who disagree with them. As soon as I detect that attitude in people my guard goes up for these are the basest traits in human nature and never to be admired.
