Quite honestly Grahame, I don't know ANYONE here who DOES think there is one although I've seen the word bandied around this afternoon. However, when it was stated that there WAS NO INJUNCTION, Neil asked "How do you know that" which can only say one of two things A. From where and whom did you get that information or B. You don't know everything.
Neil was quite correct in what he said. We, in fact nobody would know if there was an injunction even if there was one. His question was quite a legitimate one and also a legal one, because if an injunction was taken out on this book then it would be illegal to even mention the fact.
I don't think that Neil actually believes there is one? The only dramatic language used in connection with the publication of this book is that which has been put about by Harrison himself. First we have that dramatic pm to Jackie where he complains that the authorities have been hounding him trying to stop publication, then we get his dramatic claim that he had received a death threat against him if he did go ahead and publish it. In fact all these alleged people who have been threatening him have come from him and him alone. The actual people to have suffered persecution are those whom he has implicated causing these people to be accused by some on here with absolutely no proof whatsoever and all this upset and unjustified persecution of these individuals on here has come from this man alone. Personally I think it is all just hype on his part?
