Author Topic: Why is it not fair to point out people have no valid basis for their claims?  (Read 29647 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
I am trying to turn the situation around and imagine what I would think if I were Jeremy, and someone asked me a question like that. I think I would suspect that the person asking was having doubts about me.

Perhaps he did that really doesn't explain why he didn't answer. You'd have thought if that were the case, he would have answered and not dodge it completely.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Mr Gee if that is the case and Jackie suspected it surely she should have been warning me about him ;D

Neil

  • Guest
Yes I can see what you mean. Concerning MD. I think that he has been deceiving us into thinking he is a pro Bamber. But in reality he believes him to be guilty. I rather feel that he is the one who is being deceptive and Jackie knows this. I am not saying of course this gives her licence to be abusive herself. I'm trying not to offend anyone here and perhaps that is not the right way of going about it. But I'm just trying to see things from all sides and it isn't easy when you like all of the parties concerned.
I don't agree.  I was never left with that impression. 

Perhaps it was just wishful thinking on your part, or, I suppose, you may have quite reasonably assumed that he wouldn't be bothering to write a book in favour of guilt, because....well...what would be the point?

Offline tyler

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2395
No,not wishful thinking at all on Grahame's part. Did you not read the article that was printed in a Scottish newspaper?

        http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Book+cop+I%27ll+show+Bamber%27s+innocent.-a0337437563
« Last Edit: October 11, 2014, 01:34:PM by tyler »

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Perhaps he did that really doesn't explain why he didn't answer. You'd have thought if that were the case, he would have answered and not dodge it completely.

Not neccessarily. Given his character, he might have thought, she has a nerve to be asking me this, none of her business. Him being non confrontational, he might have just dodged the question. After all, he could easily have made up a lie, he didn“t.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Hello tyler Mason Doyle told us on the forum not to believe anything we read in newspapers only believe what he himself told us.  I must ask has he said he thinks Jeremy Bamber is innocent or guilty I don't believe he has.

Neil

  • Guest
No,not wishful thinking at all on Grahame's part. Did you not read the article that was printed in a Scottish newspaper?

        http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Book+cop+I%27ll+show+Bamber%27s+innocent.-a0337437563
Thanks for that Tyler.  I never read newspapers. 

Offline ngb1066

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6670
Hello tyler Mason Doyle told us on the forum not to believe anything we read in newspapers only believe what he himself told us.  I must ask has he said he thinks Jeremy Bamber is innocent or guilty I don't believe he has.

He has made it very clear that he believes Jeremy Bamber to be guilty.  His last post here contained one indication, but there have been others.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17250
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
« Last Edit: October 11, 2014, 01:55:PM by nugnug »

Offline ngb1066

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6670

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17250
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
i wonder what made him change his mind.

Neil

  • Guest
He has made it very clear that he believes Jeremy Bamber to be guilty.  His last post here contained one indication, but there have been others.
I recall the last post you refer to.  I don't remember any others.  I made a point of reading all his posts. 

Offline ngb1066

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6670
i not sure what to make of MD i think we will have to waite till hes book comes out if it ever does.

I doubt if it will, but we will see in due course.


guest154

  • Guest
That's strange. MD always struck me as believing Bamber was innocent. In fact his posts seem to confirm he is of an innocent stance & in the PM he sent me he asked if I had a vested interest in keeping an "innocent man inside" so I never took him for a guilter, not even slightly.


I doubt if it will, but we will see in due course.



I think people were taken in by him rather easily here.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17250
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
i never seen anything thats suggested he had changed his mind of course i dont know what hes said in private.