Why is it not fair to point out people have no valid basis for their claims?

[Caroline]

You have had your answer twice
Are you really that thick !!!!!!

Obviously you must be you answered A question not THEE question. I'm not talking about your trying to discredit MD, I'm talking about what you said a few weeks ago ie. what were you referring to? "I can't wait for tomorrow I'm sure you will get an answer"? When have you answered this?

[tyler]

Caroline. I do think that if it was Jackie,she would indeed admit it. After all,Jeremy is likely going to tell you who it was anyway?

[Caroline]

Caroline. I do think that if it was Jackie,she would indeed admit it. After all,Jeremy is likely going to tell you who it was anyway?

I'm asking her what she meant by the comment and she doesn't answer. I don't believe she would admit it - she is still denying what happened with MD.

[Jane]

Caroline. I do think that if it was Jackie,she would indeed admit it. After all,Jeremy is likely going to tell you who it was anyway?

Tyler, there's been much more in the way of fudging, hedging, blurring, telling Caroline what she'd like to see happen to her and general huffing and puffing, than there has been by way of explanation.

[guest7363]

I wouldn't think it possible. But Grahame says it is.....and he was admin. 

Strange though Matt don't you think? After having private conversations with Susan about the trauma of losing dad out of the blue i get this?

Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion / Re: Conversations with persons inside WHF. How was this carried out ?
« on: September 02, 2014, 07:18:PM »
Quote from: JackiePreece on September 02, 2014, 07:08:PM
How's business after all your problems?

Never mentioned anything before about any problems, i have not been able to talk about it.

[Caroline]

Strange though Matt don't you think? After having private conversations with Susan about the trauma of losing dad out of the blue i get this?

Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion / Re: Conversations with persons inside WHF. How was this carried out ?
« on: September 02, 2014, 07:18:PM »
Quote from: JackiePreece on September 02, 2014, 07:08:PM
How's business after all your problems?

Never mentioned anything before about any problems, i have not been able to talk about it.

OMG! Not her AGAIN!! 

[Jane]

OMG! Not her AGAIN!! 

Oh dear

[guest7363]

OMG! Not her AGAIN!! 

Surely Caroline you can remember i asked Susan to ask you if people could read my Pms? It might be innocent and i will apologise maybe Jackie could remind me what problems she was on about.

[susan]

Caroline justice knows everything he tells me is in confidence so where did this information come from.  justice and I were quite worried about it and did receive then delete just to be on the safe side.

[susan]

justice I remember I contacted Caroline on your behalf.  Very strange indeed.

[Alias]

Strange though Matt don't you think? After having private conversations with Susan about the trauma of losing dad out of the blue i get this?

Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion / Re: Conversations with persons inside WHF. How was this carried out ?
« on: September 02, 2014, 07:18:PM »
Quote from: JackiePreece on September 02, 2014, 07:08:PM
How's business after all your problems?

Never mentioned anything before about any problems, i have not been able to talk about it.

How would jackie know what was in your private PMs? Someone must have told her, surely she has no access to PMs. Or one PM accidentally was sent to her?

[susan]

Aias I can assure you Jackie and I don't pm   I am the only person justice told and we are very good friends and do not break a confidence so no I told nobody and justice told nobody but me. We will see what Jackie has to say when she appears

[guest7363]

How would jackie know what was in your private PMs? Someone must have told her, surely she has no access to PMs. Or one PM accidentally was sent to her?

Susan was the only person i told and i trust her 100 per cent. Same as i say it might be innocent but i got this out of the blue, with no follow up?

[guest154]

Hi Justice.
Yes, tha does seem strange. But she didn't refer to your Dad - so she may have meant something else. Jackie often thinks she knows who EVERYONE is and that it is her business to let them know she knows her real identity. So there is a chance that she believed she knew who you are and that was her way of letting you know she knows. If that makes sense to you.

[guest7363]

Hi Justice.
Yes, tha does seem strange. But she didn't refer to your Dad - so she may have meant something else. Jackie often thinks she knows who EVERYONE is and that it is her business to let them know she knows her real identity. So there is a chance that she believed she knew who you are and that was her way of letting you know she knows. If that makes sense to you.

Funny i had this explained to me at the time in a similar way. but with Grahame saying what he did just made me think again? If it could be done then it can be done now?  Who knows who has special powers?