Author Topic: Devastation on Publication of the News of the World Article  (Read 9423 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Re: Devastation on Publication of the News of the World Article
« Reply #15 on: September 26, 2014, 07:27:PM »
This must be about the 5th time Alias has put this picture up since I joined. And she says she is undecided. Well has been saying it since others turned.

As everyone knows Jeremy had a deal a long time before Julie. He wanted 100k and promised it would be an explosive story. Just as his offer to the sun of Sheila's pictures would have been.


She only puts it up because she knows you salivate over it. I believe you've said, once or twice, that you think Julie looks tasty.

Mr. Gee

  • Guest
Re: Devastation on Publication of the News of the World Article
« Reply #16 on: September 26, 2014, 07:28:PM »
This must be about the 5th time Alias has put this picture up since I joined. And she says she is undecided. Well has been saying it since others turned.

As everyone knows Jeremy had a deal a long time before Julie. He wanted 100k and promised it would be an explosive story. Just as his offer to the sun of Sheila's pictures would have been.
I rather think that it is not so much that Bamber got banged up, but that she got off scott free. Because she got off scott free she was then able to go to Canada. Canada do not accept people with criminal records. So forgive those who think she was exceptionally lucky to get away with an unblemished record. For the life of me I cannot understand why people defend her? The family certainly do not like her.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44352
Re: Devastation on Publication of the News of the World Article
« Reply #17 on: September 26, 2014, 07:30:PM »
The NOTW approached Julie after realising Jeremy may be found guilty. They needed a back up exclusive.

Julie could have demanded the same fee as Jeremy. They would have to pay it if Bamber got convicted and the NOTW wanted an exclusive. Or they would have nothing.

But she settled for 25k. A lot less than Bamber. However Bamber still moaned to his lawyers on the morning of the verdict about his NOTW deal.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Devastation on Publication of the News of the World Article
« Reply #18 on: September 26, 2014, 07:31:PM »
What does it matter ? It's a reminder of who put Jeremy away.Because nothing else did !

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44352
Re: Devastation on Publication of the News of the World Article
« Reply #19 on: September 26, 2014, 07:31:PM »

She only puts it up because she knows you salivate over it. I believe you've said, once or twice, that you think Julie looks tasty.

I have never said that. Do not lie.

Once, I said she was naturally quite pretty but looked slutty in the NOTW article.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44352
Re: Devastation on Publication of the News of the World Article
« Reply #20 on: September 26, 2014, 07:33:PM »
I rather think that it is not so much that Bamber got banged up, but that she got off scott free. Because she got off scott free she was then able to go to Canada. Canada do not accept people with criminal records. So forgive those who think she was exceptionally lucky to get away with an unblemished record. For the life of me I cannot understand why people defend her? The family certainly do not like her.

Have you got a source saying the family do not like her.

Thank you.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44352
Re: Devastation on Publication of the News of the World Article
« Reply #21 on: September 26, 2014, 07:34:PM »
What does it matter ? It's a reminder of who put Jeremy away.Because nothing else did !

 :)
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Devastation on Publication of the News of the World Article
« Reply #22 on: September 26, 2014, 07:35:PM »
I rather think that it is not so much that Bamber got banged up, but that she got off scott free. Because she got off scott free she was then able to go to Canada. Canada do not accept people with criminal records. So forgive those who think she was exceptionally lucky to get away with an unblemished record. For the life of me I cannot understand why people defend her? The family certainly do not like her.

i dont know the man who cliamed to have spokesman defended her.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Devastation on Publication of the News of the World Article
« Reply #23 on: September 26, 2014, 07:36:PM »
Have you got a source saying the family do not like her.

Thank you.

it would be rather disturbing if they did like her agter seeing that.

Mr. Gee

  • Guest
Re: Devastation on Publication of the News of the World Article
« Reply #24 on: September 26, 2014, 07:38:PM »
Have you got a source saying the family do not like her.

Thank you.
Yes vidvic. I've spoken to him on the phone.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Re: Devastation on Publication of the News of the World Article
« Reply #25 on: September 26, 2014, 07:39:PM »
The NOTW approached Julie after realising Jeremy may be found guilty. They needed a back up exclusive.

Julie could have demanded the same fee as Jeremy. They would have to pay it if Bamber got convicted and the NOTW wanted an exclusive. Or they would have nothing.

But she settled for 25k. A lot less than Bamber. However Bamber still moaned to his lawyers on the morning of the verdict about his NOTW deal.


Now shall we look at this sensibly? He was either going to be guilty or innocent. Unlike the Scots, we don't do "Not proven" so the NOTW weren't hedging TOO many bets, were they?

I think it HIGHLY unlikely they'd have paid Julie what they'd have paid Jeremy. Julie wasn't being charged. Also, I imagine that the amount paid was done and dusted before the outcome to prevent a wily lawyer saying she was entitled to more.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Devastation on Publication of the News of the World Article
« Reply #26 on: September 26, 2014, 07:40:PM »
Yes vidvic. I've spoken to him on the phone.

thats not what he seemed to be saying when he was on here.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44352
Re: Devastation on Publication of the News of the World Article
« Reply #27 on: September 26, 2014, 07:40:PM »
well if the jury had known they may well og given less weight to her evidence.

there also the fact the judge was lied to.

The jury did not know about either NOTW verbal deals. They did not need to. Nothing had been signed.

They would guess that both would have a deal after the verdict. It was a high profile case.

The jury did know about Susan Battersby's 1984 minor cheque book fraud. The defence brought it up to try to discredit her.
« Last Edit: September 26, 2014, 07:41:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: Devastation on Publication of the News of the World Article
« Reply #28 on: September 26, 2014, 07:40:PM »
This must be about the 5th time Alias has put this picture up since I joined. And she says she is undecided. Well has been saying it since others turned.

As everyone knows Jeremy had a deal a long time before Julie. He wanted 100k and promised it would be an explosive story. Just as his offer to the sun of Sheila's pictures would have been.

No, I have always said that. Members here are my witnesses. You try to claim otherwise, but you are wrong.

What has posting this picture got to do with my stance on the case?'
Anyway, I just wrote that I am 99.9% sure that Julie was in on it if Jeremy is indeed guilty. I don´t feel bad posting this picture - she posed for it herself and got her pay.

Thank you!

(And what you say has not an iota to do with what I think about this case! I know you think you have turned other people, Caroline, April, Susan, they have to fend for themselves - you haven´t had any impact on me - just <-----Italics  :P - posh..... :P), my stance has never changed. It is the same as the very first day I heard about the case a few years back - before you were here.

Offline Stephanie

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7614
  • The facts leading to the Simon Hall confession
Re: Devastation on Publication of the News of the World Article
« Reply #29 on: September 26, 2014, 07:41:PM »

Now shall we look at this sensibly? He was either going to be guilty or innocent. Unlike the Scots, we don't do "Not proven" so the NOTW weren't hedging TOO many bets, were they?

I think it HIGHLY unlikely they'd have paid Julie what they'd have paid Jeremy. Julie wasn't being charged. Also, I imagine that the amount paid was done and dusted before the outcome to prevent a wily lawyer saying she was entitled to more.

I think your credibility has gone out the window April, even with Adam.
“The only people who are mad at you for telling the truth are those people who are living a lie. Keep telling the truth"