Unfortunately as we have nothing to go on excepy her book and hearsay it would be wrong to speculate what kind of pictures they were? If they were real "porn" pictures as they are made out to be by some the Sun would not even consider publishing them even today let alone back in 1985 and I can't imagine Bamber and Collins trying to sell them to the newspaper as they would have known that it would have been a futile action.
No,they weren't porn,Mr G, more on the lines of " using props " if you can imagine that,though nothing explicit.Apparently,the use of these " props " didn't go down well with either the house-owner,whose garden it was that Sheila had used,or the neighbours when they found out.
As you can imagine,there was a furore between mother and daughter,when the church-going mother found out about them.
I imagine that these little " behind the scenes acts of defiance " didn't help to smooth the rough waters of the mother/daughter relationship. In fact,June would have been hairless,I imagine.
