Hello

[Caroline]

I'm not being naughty at all. If hartley alias harters alias jam etc etc can do it so can I. I have not deliberately hidden my identity as some continue to do on this forum, because "G" is my initial. I am not being deceptive. I left because of the abuse that was going on. Not because of Caroline as some have said and not because some have changed their stance.
I very reluctantly came back because some kept on about me doing so. I have seen the comments of some about me by some and that stopped me from signing up again. But then I reasoned that those people who said such things are not that important anyway.
I don't expect a welcome from you april anyway and for your information I was not looking to disguise myself as you suggest.

Thank you Grahame, I didn't think you did leave because of me.

[Mr. Gee]

so you havent changed your mind then graham i thought that was a scurless roumour.

Of course I haven't. Most of those on here who think he's guilty here on the forum were still in nappies when this tragedy happened. Yet most think they have studied so much about the case that they can wax eloquent at every turn.
Second and third hand knowledge is what it is. But I know and have spoken to people who actually knew Bamber and remain convinced of his innocence. First hand knowledge is what that is.

[nugnug]

i thought it was bollocks when i first heard it.

[tyler]

Hello I'm Mr. Gee and I believe that Jeremy Bamber was well and truly screwed by the police and sent down for a crime he did not commit.
In the 1980's the police force was rife with corruption and Freemasonry. The backed up oneanother and cover each other's backsides.
You simply cannot build any reasonable scenario from the pack of lies concocted by them.
A colleague of mine (who unfortunately has passed away) was in possession of a certain book that listed all the members of the Freemasons. Robert Boutflour's father was a Freemason and since Freemasonry passes from son to father it is very possible that Robert Boutflour was a Freemason too?
Why is that a proble you may ask? Well the problem is that the police force prohibits officers to belong to any secret organisation and for obvious reasons. That their allegiance to the Masons could compromise their duties as police officers and I suggest that in this particular case it did.

The police force is STILL rife with corruption and Freemasonary - nothing has changed there! Are you saying that that the police force prohibits officers to be Freemasons? I dont think that is true.I think that it just is now required that if they are Freemasons then they have to declare that they are?

[susan]

Mr. Gee think your information with regard Freemasonry automatically passing from Father to son could be incorrect.  I would have to say it is not appropriate for a Father to ask his son to join the Freemasons the son must ask the Father. Then it will be proposed and seconded and voted on something on those lines.

[Mr. Gee]

Mr. Gee think your information with regard Freemasonry automatically passing from Father to son could be incorrect.  I would have to say it is not appropriate for a Father to ask his son to join the Freemasons the son must ask the Father. Then it will be proposed and seconded and voted on something on those lines.

According to the book I think you'll find I'm right and it is one seruptitiously as many thing are in the cult of freemasonry.