Hi Scorpio 
There is no evidence to say that Sheila never handled a rifle or gun whilst she lived on the farm. Even if she never used a weapon she would have seen how they had been used. Its not rocket science how to use one. Sheila went on a shoot to Scotland as a beater, thus makes the none interest in shooting fail as she was clearly present with her husband at the time.
There is clearly no evidence to say that Jeremy put the moderator back in the gun cupboard. There are no fingerprints on the moderator and even if fingerprints were on, they became damaged when the moderator was found in the cupboard. Not only was the moderator handled and passed round it was examined and taken into the crime scene area. Its not safe to suggest that Jeremy had and its equally unsafe to say Sheila had its matter of what you believe.
Sheila or Jeremy could have placed the moderator in cupboard. Its not so concrete IMO...
The evidence was that Sheila may have gone on a trip to Scotland. Whether she actually went with the realtives when they were shooting for support or not is unclear. That doesn't exhibit an interest in guns even if she did go for support let alone suggest she would be able to fire any of the shotguns they used.
Seeing someone fire a shotgun from a distance doesn't mena one would be capable of loading and operating ashotgun let alone a semi-auto. The first semi-auto wasn't purchased until the end of 1984 and was rarely used. She was rarely on the farm while it was there. Jeremy allegedly tried to teach her how to load a magazine, probably to get her prints on it, but she refused to try.
The reality is that she would not have known she needed to manually chamber a round let alone known how to do so thus even with a loaded magazine to place in the gun she still would not have been able to get it to fire.
As for the moderator, how could she have put it away after she was killed with it? For tha tmatter how coudl she have shot herself without getting GSR on her clothing? How could she have placed the bible in a pool of her own blood after she was dead? How could she have moved her body after she was dead? These are all indications that someone else killed her.
How could she have killed everyone without getting their blood on her especially Nevill's blood as he was being beaten? How could she have been bashing him with the rifle and yet not have received a scratch form the broken stock which broke where the killer would have been holding it as it broke? The gun was covered in blood how could such blood not get on her hands and clothing? The killer clearly wore gloves that is why there were no prints in the blood. The killer also changed clothing. Sheila would not have had any reason to wear gloves or to change her clothing and if she had done so the clothes she changed out of would have been present.
So we have evidence she didn't kill anyone else and evidence she didn't kill herself.
To unbiased, rational people that means someone else killed them all. I realize that is not the take of Jeremy supporters but Jeremy supporters have nothing at all to refute this evidence they just ignore it. that doesn't make it go away and unless refuted no judges are going to set Jeremy free.
Jeremy clearly lied about the gun being left out in the kitchen with the bullets and no moderator attached. His story of why he took the gun out was not credible. Taking it out period to shoot rabbits was not credible because he never did such before. Even worse though his stories about hearing them is ludicrous and seeing them as it was getitng dark little better. His story of the gun being found without the moderator and scope attached because it could not be stored with them attached was also a lie. he also woudl have wanted to use them in order to shoot rabbits.
He even lied about Sheila firing the murder wepaon and all weapons in the house. The bullets were clearly staged after the fact which proves his claims of leaving the gun out was false. Not even Jeremy could think up a lie to account for how the killer could have used 25 bullets from a stash of 48-50 bullets and yet there could be 30 remaining. Did they multiply from use like the biblical fish and loaves of bread? Jeremy also lied about the phone being broken he replaced a perfectly good phone with the one from the bedroom. WHy would a crazy Sheila go get the moderator out to use let alone put it away after killing everyone else? But she can't have put it away after she was dead anyway.
He clearly made up Nevill's call as well because:
1) Sheila clearly the gun had not been left out and Sheila had done nothing and thus there is no way Nevill would have called to make up such a story
2) There was no opportunity for Nevill to make such a call. The parents were ambushed in their bedroom, where there was no phone. That is unquestionably where the events began and then Nevill went to the kitchen where he was killed. When coudl he have made the call? No one who supports Jeremy has come up with anything credible at all as to how Sheila would have allowed Neivll to make the call, let alone why he would call Jeremy instead of police. In fact no supporters can explain why he would need anyone to help disarm her. He could have done so himself otherwise could have armed himself.
Then there is Julie's testimony which the evidence comports with that Jeremy planned to frame SHeial and did so.
Trying to pretend that there is no evidence against Jeremy is a complete and total waste of time. That lie is meant to avoid having to actually deal with the evidence but again avoiding it and pretending it doesn't exist doesn't make it go away.
