What exhibits were destroyed in 1996?

[JackiePreece]

Chill Jackie you wont get anywhere in this game of fighting a MOJ by those kind of remarks. There are ways and means....Jeremy was/is a convicted murderer and we should all remember that.  If there is a miscarriage of justice then we need to get heads together to find a loophole that proves him innocent. Being disrespectful to people on a forum wont wins points for Jeremy it blackens his name even further.

I'm not getting at you. I am being honest with you and I hope you respect that. 

Patti

The fact is I have numerous pm messages that members will no longer post on this forum because of Caroline and her sidekicks behaviour
Her messages are rude I e rolling eyes and I will react when someone tries to stop open discussion
I am surprised if you can't see it
She thinks she is intelligent well I have my own opinion
I spend plenty of time doing work for this case and I do not have to put up with the sort of behaviour that frightens people away and I certainly don't have to sit up all night to get results
I have a life

I am still waiting for Susan to qualify how she knows Jeremy has a personality disorder because that a serious suggestion

[ngb1066]

There is no evidence JB is guilty so put the knitting needles down and try a bit harder

We all know who has put you up to use that phrase Jackie.  I strongly advise you not to repeat it.

[susan]

Ha Ha Ha Jackie you are a joke knitting needles indeed is that the best you can come up all this is because I befriended Bridget remember.  Time for you to move on as you sound as if you are becoming one very bitter person and will end up with no friends at all on either forum. You can not resist getting personal can you have I ever been like that with you NO have I ever been abusive to you NO so what is your problem I guess you find me an easy target and if it makes you feel better carry on as you have no effect on me whatsoever.  I will decide where I post not you

[ngb1066]

Patti

The fact is I have numerous pm messages that members will no longer post on this forum because of Caroline and her sidekicks behaviour

How many PMs Jackie, seriously?  We know that Graham has deleted his profile so he is not able to PM you (I hope he decides to return soon).  As far as I can see all other active members here are still posting.  Who are you suggesting is now afraid to post?

[JackiePreece]

Numerous pm messages but obviously I can't say but it's very easy to work out the people who used to post regularly.
You have achieved a forum which now has more guilty posters than ones that believe Jeremy's case is a miscarriage.
As for Susan's comments I am disgusted, I certainly don't dislike her because of Bridget. Bridget got her just desserts and will have the LVT decision on her companies record for ever
Grahame is a brilliant guy and will never return to the forum and we email each other so they are pm messages

[Patti]

Numerous pm messages but obviously I can't say but it's very easy to work out the people who used to post regularly.
You have achieved a forum which now has more guilty posters than ones that believe Jeremy's case is a miscarriage.
As for Susan's comments I am disgusted, I certainly don't dislike her because of Bridget. Bridget got her just desserts and will have the LVT decision on her companies record for ever
Grahame is a brilliant guy and will never return to the forum and we email each other so they are pm messages

That's not good Jackie. It is hardly anyones fault that a poster changes their mind regarding Jeremy Bamber its the poster themselves that do this for reason only known to them and bares no responsibility of others.   :D

[ngb1066]

Numerous pm messages but obviously I can't say but it's very easy to work out the people who used to post regularly.
You have achieved a forum which now has more guilty posters than ones that believe Jeremy's case is a miscarriage.As for Susan's comments I am disgusted, I certainly don't dislike her because of Bridget. Bridget got her just desserts and will have the LVT decision on her companies record for ever
Grahame is a brilliant guy and will never return to the forum and we email each other so they are pm messages

Are you suggesting that I am responsible for three members here changing their stance on the case?  How have I done that?

What do you suggest should happen - should we have a limit on the number of members who believe Jeremy is guilty?

As far as Grahame is concerned it is a pity he has left and I hope he returns soon.

Apart from Grahame I have to say I doubt if you have received any PMs from members saying they are no longer posting here.  If you do not want to name them, at least tell us how many members have expressed this view to you.

[Jane]

Patti

The fact is I have numerous pm messages that members will no longer post on this forum because of Caroline and her sidekicks behaviour
Her messages are rude I e rolling eyes and I will react when someone tries to stop open discussion
I am surprised if you can't see it
She thinks she is intelligent well I have my own opinion
I spend plenty of time doing work for this case and I do not have to put up with the sort of behaviour that frightens people away and I certainly don't have to sit up all night to get results
I have a life

I am still waiting for Susan to qualify how she knows Jeremy has a personality disorder because that a serious suggestion

Jackie, that post can achieve little more than stirring up enmity. It's an attack on those whose only "crime" is to believe that Jeremy is guilty. That you do a lot of work on Jeremy's behalf is admirable and whilst it's true that you don't have to put up with the sort of behaviours that frighten people away, I think it's a very good idea for us ALL to try to see ourselves as others see US, before we condemn them. If I was a person who was scared of my own shadow, I'd find you very intimidating -I'm NOT making an accusation, just an observation- and whilst that may not be your intention it's how I read what you say. We have to take responsibility for our own actions so it's useless to say we're being disrespected if it's we who are giving disrespect.

[susan]

Hello Patti I have been on the forum for over two years and did think Jeremy Bamber was innocent.   I have good reason now to think he is guilty I did not come to this conclusion easily and was quite saddened in some way as I had believed in his innocence so much.  I respect everyone's views on their stance and so many of my friends on here think he is innocent but I am fortunate that they have remained my friends.  I do think he had a very unfair trial and was "fitted up" by EP but for that he would never have been charged.  Where he goes from here is not dependant on this forum or anyone on it all we can do is be respectful to each other that is how I was brought up.

[JackiePreece]

Are you suggesting that I am responsible for three members here changing their stance on the case?  How have I done that?

What do you suggest should happen - should we have a limit on the number of members who believe Jeremy is guilty?

As far as Grahame is concerned it is a pity he has left and I hope he returns soon.

Apart from Grahame I have to say I doubt if you have received any PMs from members saying they are no longer posting here.  If you do not want to name them, at least tell us how many members have expressed this view to you.

6 members so what proportion of regular posters is that

[JackiePreece]

That's not good Jackie. It is hardly anyones fault that a poster changes their mind regarding Jeremy Bamber its the poster themselves that do this for reason only known to them and bares no responsibility of others.   :D

That's not the point Patti it's the guilty people that make sly comments or make statements when they are just assumptions and the rolling eyes etc

Caroline acts like she is intelligent I see the opposite with her rude posts with her mate Hartley

[ngb1066]

6 members so what proportion of regular posters is that

Apart from Grahame I am not able to name even one member who was until recently active here and who no longer posts. 

 

[Caroline]

Patti

The fact is I have numerous pm messages that members will no longer post on this forum because of Caroline and her sidekicks behaviour
Her messages are rude I e rolling eyes and I will react when someone tries to stop open discussion
I am surprised if you can't see it
She thinks she is intelligent well I have my own opinion
I spend plenty of time doing work for this case and I do not have to put up with the sort of behaviour that frightens people away and I certainly don't have to sit up all night to get results
I have a life

I am still waiting for Susan to qualify how she knows Jeremy has a personality disorder because that a serious suggestion

Really Jackie? Lets see them? I suspect they are kept in the same place as the source for you claim about Sheila saying she wanted a reconciliation! And your insider info on the Mason Doyle book!

Talking about 'serious suggestions' - the claim about AE being besotted with Jeremy is a pretty serious accusation.

The ONLY person trying to stop open discussion is YOU it's unbelievable just how hypocritical you are!!

[susan]

Caroline I cannot understand why Jackie is disgusted because I said I THOUGHT Jeremy Bamber had a personality disorder Adam made the same claim before me in fact he directed me to where it was documented so why the personal attacks against me.  She does not appear to be disgusted with him it is an excuse to have a pop at me and I will never understand why she has this intense dislike for me.  I certainly don't for her.

[Caroline]

That's not the point Patti it's the guilty people that make sly comments or make statements when they are just assumptions and the rolling eyes etc

Caroline acts like she is intelligent I see the opposite with her rude posts with her mate Hartley

I act like I'm intelligent? How do I do that if I'm stupid? That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard!

You have no idea how rude your are! You came here for one reason and it was nothing to do with Jeremy!! Your initial threads were aimed specifically at me - I guess you thought you could intimidate me like you have with others in the past - but that would NEVER be the case. If you can't take it, don't dish it out and it you do dish it out, don't be surprised when it gets hurled back at you.