Author Topic: A Call To Essex Police From Neville? - The poll  (Read 58547 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33776
Re: A Call To Essex Police From Neville? - The poll
« Reply #645 on: October 09, 2014, 07:16:PM »
Personally I think Scipio should post  some new threads

these threads should cover - ONE ITEM at a time that PROVES that JEREMY is guilty.

The THREAD should not cover any other  subject and we can then when we see both sides of the argument  decide what we think.

We can all agree to be civil if he is .

I would like him to start with the ammunition that was left out and why he thinks it is so obvious that it PROVES Jeremys guilt



I hesitate to say this, because I can't be certain, but I feel that much of what he's arrived at MAY be by process of elimination, ie, if the possibility of it being anyone else is ruled out, there is only Jeremy.

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: A Call To Essex Police From Neville? - The poll
« Reply #646 on: October 09, 2014, 07:21:PM »

Scipio, I sometimes find myself wondering how much hair you have. You frequently come over as being so stressed and wound up that I feel you might spend a long time pulling it out. Do you perhaps feel that it's your mission in life to "cure" those who believe Jeremy innocent OR perhaps it's that, MUCH as you love to argue, you hate being disagreed with. I'm not sure that you can exercise one without inviting the other.

Lookout has made her choice. Having you hurling accusations at her ISN'T going to change that. YOU may see Lookout as a "sad character" -I see her as a very tough and determined lady. Sure, her beliefs irritate me from time to time and I'd quite like for her to see things my way, but she doesn't and for the most part, I'm cool with it. C'est la vie. Just one more thing, though Scipio. If I was in ANY kind of jam, I'd feel a HELL of a lot better knowing she was on MY side, believing in ME, rather than  the evidence, coz there's always the chance that the evidence is going to be wrong.

Did skippy really call a fellow poster "a sad character"?
That is plain evil.

Can´t imagine what kind of a sad life he must have to sit all day writing long, typo-ridden posts about a thirty year old murder case, where the person he thinks is guilty is actually behind bars, and in the proces bashing and bullying perfect strangers in a far away country!  8)

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: A Call To Essex Police From Neville? - The poll
« Reply #647 on: October 09, 2014, 08:00:PM »
I locked this thread to evaluate what has happened and I have read all the post concerned.  I have not edited any posts or removed them.

Firstly, please do not try to bully people in changing what they believe in.  I will give you following examples:

You don't want to face the truth.
You have no balls
You post bogus claims
You ignore everything
You misrepresent
You don't get one thing right
You tell lies
You believe anything
You talk nonsense
You don't research the facts
You don't have a grasp on any of the facts
You don't understand
You don't grasp the facts
You are a sad character.

You, you, you you.

Above is is from Scipio

Lookout's post were she attempted to swear will stay.

If this behavior does not stop I will ask for a warning to be given.

This thread will be closed till tomorrow to allow a cooling off period.

Thank you.

Please read April's post # 626

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: A Call To Essex Police From Neville? - The poll
« Reply #648 on: October 10, 2014, 05:54:PM »
Personally I think Scipio should post  some new threads

these threads should cover - ONE ITEM at a time that PROVES that JEREMY is guilty.

The THREAD should not cover any other  subject and we can then when we see both sides of the argument  decide what we think.

We can all agree to be civil if he is .

I would like him to start with the ammunition that was left out and why he thinks it is so obvious that it PROVES Jeremys guilt

I have posted the evidence many times.  It is inter-related though.  There is no way to just view each prong in isolation.

For instance, the fact Sheila could not have killed herself not only proves someone else committed the crime it means the call from Nevill never happened.  Why would Nevill call Jeremy and blame the wrong person? Short of someone holding  agun on Nevill and forcig him to finger the wrong perosn he would not do it and he would have reaosn to know they were going to kill him anyway so would be better off telling the truth in such circumstance so the person responsible can be arrested.  Even the defense at trial admitted that if Sheila didn't kill everyone that means Jeremy lied about receiving a call fro Nevill and committed the murders himself.

There are other things as well that prove the call from Nevill never happened.

1) Julie said Jeremy planned to kill his family, frame Sheila and say he received a phone call from WHF. Thus the claim he received a phone call was something he made up in advance as part of a preconceived plan to kill everyone.

2) Nevill and June were shot together in the master bedroom.  Jeremy made sure the phone was removed prior to the murders thus even if the killer walked in and held them at gunpoint for a while before shooting them Nevill could not have used the phone to call for help.  The notion June would stay in bed as Sheila were running around crazy with a gun is bad enough.  But to suggest Nevill left June alone with Sheila to call Jeremy and that Sheila disconnected the call after he got his message off, then took the phone off the hook so no one could call back and then marched him upstairs so she could shoot the parents together instead of shooting him in the kitchen when she found him on the phone is not credible.

3) Nevill had no reason to call Jeremy to ask for help.  He had a better physical ability to disarm Sheila than Jeremy did, he would have had the need to disarm her immediately as to waiting 15-20 minutes for Jeremy to come even (if Jeremy even answered the phone) and she didn't even know how to use the weapon so it would be extremely unlikely she chambered a round which is a prerequisite to being able to fire the gun.  In the meantime the kitchen was loaded with guns, knives and other potential weapons he coudl have used to disarm her so he would no have needed to use his bare hands just to disarm her.  If he too worried to try anything himself he would have called 999 not requested an additional family member to come place his life at risk.

4) Jeremy's reactions were not the reactions of someone receiving such a call. Someone receiving such a call would either get dressed and rush over or to call 999.  He did neither.  He called Julie and told her he had not been to bed yet and that his plan, tha the told her in a previous call that night that he was going to implement that night, was working well.  Calling Julie period makes no sense but callin gher before police demonstrates even more that he had not received and emergency call and was not worried about the safety of his family.  If he actually received a call and were worried about the safety of his family he would have either rushed over or dialed 999.  Even after speaking to Julie he did not dial 999.  Instead he wasted time looking up the numbers of police stations.  He said no one answered the phone at the local station it just rang and rang.  Surely at that point he would call 999.  No he looke dup another station further away instead and not only wasted more time looking it up he risked again no one being there to man the phones.   Quite clearly he knew there was no emergency.

5) After calling police and going to WHF at their request he drove slowly and not only let police pass him, he drove the last mile of the trip quite slowly so that police could arrive first and see him arrive.  Worse yet, after arriving he didn't tell police he could get in through the windows, nor did he press them to go knock at the door.  The police questioned him about the guns in the house, whether SHeila coudl use them and whether Sheila would be likely to shoot at police if they went to the door and Jeremy was with them.  They wanted to know if he could calm her and keep her from shooting them.  Jeremy lied and told them she knew how to use/had fired every weapon in the house.  He also told them that he did not get along well with her and they did not like eachother. As a result instead of going to knock at the door and risk being shot if she opened it, they called for armed assistance.  Jerey in the meantime was very calm and talked about cars and guy stuff in between hamming it up about how crazy his sister was. Jeremy's lies and behavior was not that of someone concerned for his family.

6) Around 5:45AM Jeremy asked to call Julie and far from telling her he was worried about his family he told her not to go to work because she would need to talk to police and confirm he called her to express concern after receiving a call from Nevill.  He wanted her to talk to police and help buttress his fictional alibi he received a call from Nevill.

7) Jeremy did other things to frame Sheila beyond just lie about receiving a call from Nevill fingering her.  He made up the claim that he had taken the gun out to shoot rabbits and left the gun and bullets in the kitchen.  He suggested Sheila found and used the weapon as a result of him leaving it out.  He clearly made this tale up though because:

A) He staged the bullets after the murders to support his story but staged too many bullets. He staged a box that could hold 50 bullets max, claimed it was full or near full when he took it out and that the fact  it was not full or near full anymore shows the killer used this supply to commit the murders.  But if the killer had used it to fire the 25 shots then no more than 25 would have remained.  There were 30 remaining he staged too many and in the process revealed he staged them.  her eis no way the killer would have used 20 bullets form this supply and with 30 still remaining then decide to go to the closet to get another 5 bullets.

B) He was never known to use the gun to shoot a rabbits he used it only to shoot targets.  He was opposed to shooting animals.  So his account of getting it out to shoot rabbits is highly suspicious.

C) His account of hearing the rabbits or seeing them far away as it was getting dark (he kept changign hsi story of how he knew about the rabbits) is even less credible.

D) His account that the rifle had been stored without the moderator and scope attached at not credible at all either. There wa sno reaosn to remove either and someome would not want to remove them they would want to leave them attached to use anytime the gun was used.  The only reason to reove the scope would be for close quarter shooting like the murders.  Jeremy even lied initially and claimed the gun could not be stored with the scope and moderator attached to try to make it seem plausible he would find the gun like that. These lies were because he didn't want them to know the moderator was used in the commission of the crimes and he didn't want them to know he removed the scope in anticipation of committing the murders. 

E) Had he actually gotten the gun to shoot rabbits he would have wanted the moderator and scope attached.

F) June was on the phone and would have seen the pile of spilled bullets next to it, she would nto have left them there.  Nor woudl she or Nevill have left the gun and loaded magazine in the kitchen before going to bed.  Even when the boys were not there, he was careful with his weapons according to witnesses so surely with the boys staying would not have left it out.

G) Jeremy would have had survivors guilt if his family were actually murdered.  He also would have had even more severe guilt if he really did leave the gun and bullets out and it such were used in the crime because it means he was partially responsible.  That is even stronger than just ordinary survivor guilt. Yet he expressed no such feelings to anyone after the bodies were found.

All of these things together combined establish Jeremy's tale of receiving a call from Nevill were false.  Viewing each thing in isolation is improper and what Jeremy supporters want to do because the weight of the evidence combined is so overwhelming. Jeremy supporters would like to deal with one little thing at a time in isolation because it is far easier to attack that way than it is to try attacking the evidenc ein full.   

I didn't present the entire case.  I just presented all the issues that should be evaluated and looked at to assess Jeremy's claim he received a call from Nevill.

Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Mr. Gee

  • Guest
Re: A Call To Essex Police From Neville? - The poll
« Reply #649 on: October 10, 2014, 06:00:PM »
I have posted the evidence many times.  It is inter-related though.  There is no way to just view each prong in isolation.

For instance, the fact Sheila could not have killed herself not only proves someone else committed the crime it means the call from Nevill never happened.  Why would Nevill call Jeremy and blame the wrong person? Short of someone holding  agun on Nevill and forcig him to finger the wrong perosn he would not do it and he would have reaosn to know they were going to kill him anyway so would be better off telling the truth in such circumstance so the person responsible can be arrested.  Even the defense at trial admitted that if Sheila didn't kill everyone that means Jeremy lied about receiving a call fro Nevill and committed the murders himself.

There are other things as well that prove the call from Nevill never happened.

1) Julie said Jeremy planned to kill his family, frame Sheila and say he received a phone call from WHF. Thus the claim he received a phone call was something he made up in advance as part of a preconceived plan to kill everyone.

2) Nevill and June were shot together in the master bedroom.  Jeremy made sure the phone was removed prior to the murders thus even if the killer walked in and held them at gunpoint for a while before shooting them Nevill could not have used the phone to call for help.  The notion June would stay in bed as Sheila were running around crazy with a gun is bad enough.  But to suggest Nevill left June alone with Sheila to call Jeremy and that Sheila disconnected the call after he got his message off, then took the phone off the hook so no one could call back and then marched him upstairs so she could shoot the parents together instead of shooting him in the kitchen when she found him on the phone is not credible.

3) Nevill had no reason to call Jeremy to ask for help.  He had a better physical ability to disarm Sheila than Jeremy did, he would have had the need to disarm her immediately as to waiting 15-20 minutes for Jeremy to come even (if Jeremy even answered the phone) and she didn't even know how to use the weapon so it would be extremely unlikely she chambered a round which is a prerequisite to being able to fire the gun.  In the meantime the kitchen was loaded with guns, knives and other potential weapons he coudl have used to disarm her so he would no have needed to use his bare hands just to disarm her.  If he too worried to try anything himself he would have called 999 not requested an additional family member to come place his life at risk.

4) Jeremy's reactions were not the reactions of someone receiving such a call. Someone receiving such a call would either get dressed and rush over or to call 999.  He did neither.  He called Julie and told her he had not been to bed yet and that his plan, tha the told her in a previous call that night that he was going to implement that night, was working well.  Calling Julie period makes no sense but callin gher before police demonstrates even more that he had not received and emergency call and was not worried about the safety of his family.  If he actually received a call and were worried about the safety of his family he would have either rushed over or dialed 999.  Even after speaking to Julie he did not dial 999.  Instead he wasted time looking up the numbers of police stations.  He said no one answered the phone at the local station it just rang and rang.  Surely at that point he would call 999.  No he looke dup another station further away instead and not only wasted more time looking it up he risked again no one being there to man the phones.   Quite clearly he knew there was no emergency.

5) After calling police and going to WHF at their request he drove slowly and not only let police pass him, he drove the last mile of the trip quite slowly so that police could arrive first and see him arrive.  Worse yet, after arriving he didn't tell police he could get in through the windows, nor did he press them to go knock at the door.  The police questioned him about the guns in the house, whether SHeila coudl use them and whether Sheila would be likely to shoot at police if they went to the door and Jeremy was with them.  They wanted to know if he could calm her and keep her from shooting them.  Jeremy lied and told them she knew how to use/had fired every weapon in the house.  He also told them that he did not get along well with her and they did not like eachother. As a result instead of going to knock at the door and risk being shot if she opened it, they called for armed assistance.  Jerey in the meantime was very calm and talked about cars and guy stuff in between hamming it up about how crazy his sister was. Jeremy's lies and behavior was not that of someone concerned for his family.

6) Around 5:45AM Jeremy asked to call Julie and far from telling her he was worried about his family he told her not to go to work because she would need to talk to police and confirm he called her to express concern after receiving a call from Nevill.  He wanted her to talk to police and help buttress his fictional alibi he received a call from Nevill.

7) Jeremy did other things to frame Sheila beyond just lie about receiving a call from Nevill fingering her.  He made up the claim that he had taken the gun out to shoot rabbits and left the gun and bullets in the kitchen.  He suggested Sheila found and used the weapon as a result of him leaving it out.  He clearly made this tale up though because:

A) He staged the bullets after the murders to support his story but staged too many bullets. He staged a box that could hold 50 bullets max, claimed it was full or near full when he took it out and that the fact  it was not full or near full anymore shows the killer used this supply to commit the murders.  But if the killer had used it to fire the 25 shots then no more than 25 would have remained.  There were 30 remaining he staged too many and in the process revealed he staged them.  her eis no way the killer would have used 20 bullets form this supply and with 30 still remaining then decide to go to the closet to get another 5 bullets.

B) He was never known to use the gun to shoot a rabbits he used it only to shoot targets.  He was opposed to shooting animals.  So his account of getting it out to shoot rabbits is highly suspicious.

C) His account of hearing the rabbits or seeing them far away as it was getting dark (he kept changign hsi story of how he knew about the rabbits) is even less credible.

D) His account that the rifle had been stored without the moderator and scope attached at not credible at all either. There wa sno reaosn to remove either and someome would not want to remove them they would want to leave them attached to use anytime the gun was used.  The only reason to reove the scope would be for close quarter shooting like the murders.  Jeremy even lied initially and claimed the gun could not be stored with the scope and moderator attached to try to make it seem plausible he would find the gun like that. These lies were because he didn't want them to know the moderator was used in the commission of the crimes and he didn't want them to know he removed the scope in anticipation of committing the murders. 

E) Had he actually gotten the gun to shoot rabbits he would have wanted the moderator and scope attached.

F) June was on the phone and would have seen the pile of spilled bullets next to it, she would nto have left them there.  Nor woudl she or Nevill have left the gun and loaded magazine in the kitchen before going to bed.  Even when the boys were not there, he was careful with his weapons according to witnesses so surely with the boys staying would not have left it out.

G) Jeremy would have had survivors guilt if his family were actually murdered.  He also would have had even more severe guilt if he really did leave the gun and bullets out and it such were used in the crime because it means he was partially responsible.  That is even stronger than just ordinary survivor guilt. Yet he expressed no such feelings to anyone after the bodies were found.

All of these things together combined establish Jeremy's tale of receiving a call from Nevill were false.  Viewing each thing in isolation is improper and what Jeremy supporters want to do because the weight of the evidence combined is so overwhelming. Jeremy supporters would like to deal with one little thing at a time in isolation because it is far easier to attack that way than it is to try attacking the evidenc ein full.   

I didn't present the entire case.  I just presented all the issues that should be evaluated and looked at to assess Jeremy's claim he received a call from Nevill.
All I can say scipio that if I am every in trouble with the law and am innocent then I will think about calling you. ;D But heaven knows what I'll do if the case is like this one and I'm still innocent?

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: A Call To Essex Police From Neville? - The poll
« Reply #650 on: October 10, 2014, 06:05:PM »
Scipio.


Of course they are inter-related - but the reason you have posted like that is it forms your "bigger picture"

If individual scenarios can be discussed and there are "other possibilities" it weakens your argument .

So that is why I don't think you want to "discuss" them one at a time. Which you could easily do.





Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: A Call To Essex Police From Neville? - The poll
« Reply #651 on: October 10, 2014, 06:19:PM »
"Julie said Jeremy planned to kill his family, frame Sheila and say he received a phone call from WHF. Thus the claim he received a phone call was something he made up in advance as part of a preconceived plan to kill everyone."


For example if you take this in isolation - you are relying on the assumption that Julie was 100% telling the truth - and not in her 32 interviews been coached to aid the police in their conviction. As you are well aware someone was telling lies . It could have been Julie it could have been Jeremy .Both of them swore on oath . So one of them was not.  If she was not telling the truth but thought by saying this to make the crime fit because she was helping the police " get their guilty man" then it is a POSSIBILTY if Jeremy is innocent that the call from WHF did happen. You or the police could not prove that it did NOT happen.


Also remember she quite neatly covered herself in her interview with the N.O. W  - saying that he never admitted to her that he had done it . NEVER.

« Last Edit: October 10, 2014, 06:21:PM by jansus »

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: A Call To Essex Police From Neville? - The poll
« Reply #652 on: October 10, 2014, 06:23:PM »
"
E)" Had he actually gotten the gun to shoot rabbits he would have wanted the moderator and scope attached."

if they were not attached, by the time he had gone to get them and sorted it out they would have gone?

He was not going out on a days serious shooting - this was an opportunist quick trip into the garden. If he is innocent it is perfectly POSSIBLE that this could have happened.

Mr. Gee

  • Guest
Re: A Call To Essex Police From Neville? - The poll
« Reply #653 on: October 10, 2014, 06:25:PM »
"Julie said Jeremy planned to kill his family, frame Sheila and say he received a phone call from WHF. Thus the claim he received a phone call was something he made up in advance as part of a preconceived plan to kill everyone."


For example if you take this in isolation - you are relying on the assumption that Julie was 100% telling the truth - and not in her 32 interviews been coached to aid the police in their conviction. As you are well aware someone was telling lies . It could have been Julie it could have been Jeremy .Both of them swore on oath . So one of them was not.  If she was not telling the truth but thought by saying this to make the crime fit because she was helping the police " get their guilty man" then it is a POSSIBILTY if Jeremy is innocent that the call from WHF did happen. You or the police could not prove that it did NOT happen.


Also remember she quite neatly covered herself in her interview with the N.O. W  - saying that he never admitted to her that he had done it . NEVER.
My only problem with that of course is that it puts paid to his "perfect" murder  which was suppose to be his intention? I simply cannot see that he would have been such a fool as to tell her every part of his plan?

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: A Call To Essex Police From Neville? - The poll
« Reply #654 on: October 10, 2014, 06:26:PM »
"C) His account of hearing the rabbits or seeing them far away as it was getting dark (he kept changign hsi story of how he knew about the rabbits) is even less credible


Sorry but did he say it was dark ? It can be very light in the evenings here at that time of night - and early in the mornings . I would say it might be a bit silly to try and shoot them when it was perhaps not good light - but it is possible - perfectly possible.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: A Call To Essex Police From Neville? - The poll
« Reply #655 on: October 10, 2014, 06:29:PM »
what time was this ive heard nothing about it being dark before.

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: A Call To Essex Police From Neville? - The poll
« Reply #656 on: October 10, 2014, 07:09:PM »
All I can say scipio that if I am every in trouble with the law and am innocent then I will think about calling you. ;D But heaven knows what I'll do if the case is like this one and I'm still innocent?

In a case like this where the accussed is innocent and someone really did kill everyone else then commit suicide there would have to be evidence of some sort that proves the person did it.  The evidence that proves she can't have killed herself would not exist if he were innocent.

That being the case my job would be much easier.  The job is hard when the person is really guilty and thus there is so little to work with.

With the evidence proving she could not have killed herself or the others out of the way, it is easy.  I would have Jeremy tell the truth about how he didn't get along with his family or like them so he was not willing to go rush there to risk his life for them and only worried about them sufficiently to call police.  Perhaps even admit he did on occasions say to Julie he wanted his family dead but it was just talk and he never acted on it.

Without the evidence proving that Sheila could not have killed herself or anyone else hanging over your head you can get in front of arguments the prosecution will make and try to blunt them.  It is harder for me to try to think up something to blunt the evidence he wasn't known to shoot rabbits and staged the 30 bullets. The best I can do is suggest the killer didn't see the bullets, got 5 after beating Nevill unconscious firing 4 into Nevill then noticed them by the phone so had no need to go to the closet to get more and from that point on used those. Why would the killer only load 5 from the closet and not take a box out because clearly 5 would not be enough to kill Nevill then the boys and herself.  I have no answer to that the things I make up can only go so far.  But things I make up are all useless if Sheila can't have killed herself.  So that is what hads to be refuted first and foremost in this case.  All the evidence ties in to that in some way. It is the foundation that has to be undermined.

Suppose police planted evidence.  The chances of them doing it flawlessly is not liekly.  They would have planted blood with a preservative agent and/or plane dit in a manner that ende dup not being fully consistent with drawback.  there would be something I coudl find somewhere to prove it.  The chances of a perfect plant without leaving any evidence at all of it is unlikely.  So even in the case of you being actively framed there is a good chance of helping you. 

The most intelligent of Jeremy supporters believe either such information was never found and that it still might one day be found or that he was perfectly framed and thus his iccoence can never be established.  Obviously if it were the best frame job ever that is true there is little hope.  Other Jeremy supporters distort and pretend there already is evidence that proves he was framed/is innocent which is simply not the case. 

It is clear Jeremy is guilty and that is why I cna't find anythign to use to establish otherwise as opposed to the most perfect frame job featuring many unusual things that would not be present in a frame job such as police waiting to have the blood they planted analyzed for typing by the lab in September.  They would have had the blood tested right away instead of bothering with fingerprinting the moderator for so long.  The fact the police thought Sheila did it at the time they woul dhave bneed to plant the evidence also cautions against them having a reason to plant it.  That is a problem on top of the lack of any evidence of planting.

When there are materials to work with a defense attorney can do wonders.  When such materials are lacking a defense attorney can't do nearly as much.

In this case the defense was stuck suggesting that:

1) Sheila got the moderator out herself and installed it then removed it before killing herself and put it away

2) June and Nevill were killed with the moderator attached and though the expert thought it unlikely either had a contact would they nonetheless did and their blood got inside through drawback

3) Somehow their blood failed to intimately mix though no one can establish it is possible for that to happen or explain how unless they were shot a good deal of time apart and the blood thus had time to fully dry before the blood of the other victim entered and some other odd things

4) Though not a ritualistic killing Sheila nothethless went through a ritualistic cleaning process to clean off all blood of the victims and her blood and GSR stained clothing was somehow never found by anyone 

5) She somehow managed to not get any GSR on her gown when she killed herself

6) Hope the jury would ignore she could not have moved her blody flat afte rkilling herself or opened and closes the bible in her own blood.

7) believe that Julie lied in full

Essentially the defense was hoping to get  astupid jury because that is what it takes to win a case like this.

In contrast when the defense has more to work with they can convince a rational jury to acquit and would only lose if the jury is stupid and biased in the opposite manner of the stupid jury that would acquit.     

Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Mr. Gee

  • Guest
Re: A Call To Essex Police From Neville? - The poll
« Reply #657 on: October 10, 2014, 07:15:PM »
In a case like this where the accussed is innocent and someone really did kill everyone else then commit suicide there would have to be evidence of some sort that proves the person did it.  The evidence that proves she can't have killed herself would not exist if he were innocent.

That being the case my job would be much easier.  The job is hard when the person is really guilty and thus there is so little to work with.

With the evidence proving she could not have killed herself or the others out of the way, it is easy.  I would have Jeremy tell the truth about how he didn't get along with his family or like them so he was not willing to go rush there to risk his life for them and only worried about them sufficiently to call police.  Perhaps even admit he did on occasions say to Julie he wanted his family dead but it was just talk and he never acted on it.

Without the evidence proving that Sheila could not have killed herself or anyone else hanging over your head you can get in front of arguments the prosecution will make and try to blunt them.  It is harder for me to try to think up something to blunt the evidence he wasn't known to shoot rabbits and staged the 30 bullets. The best I can do is suggest the killer didn't see the bullets, got 5 after beating Nevill unconscious firing 4 into Nevill then noticed them by the phone so had no need to go to the closet to get more and from that point on used those. Why would the killer only load 5 from the closet and not take a box out because clearly 5 would not be enough to kill Nevill then the boys and herself.  I have no answer to that the things I make up can only go so far.  But things I make up are all useless if Sheila can't have killed herself.  So that is what hads to be refuted first and foremost in this case.  All the evidence ties in to that in some way. It is the foundation that has to be undermined.

Suppose police planted evidence.  The chances of them doing it flawlessly is not liekly.  They would have planted blood with a preservative agent and/or plane dit in a manner that ende dup not being fully consistent with drawback.  there would be something I coudl find somewhere to prove it.  The chances of a perfect plant without leaving any evidence at all of it is unlikely.  So even in the case of you being actively framed there is a good chance of helping you. 

The most intelligent of Jeremy supporters believe either such information was never found and that it still might one day be found or that he was perfectly framed and thus his iccoence can never be established.  Obviously if it were the best frame job ever that is true there is little hope.  Other Jeremy supporters distort and pretend there already is evidence that proves he was framed/is innocent which is simply not the case. 

It is clear Jeremy is guilty and that is why I cna't find anythign to use to establish otherwise as opposed to the most perfect frame job featuring many unusual things that would not be present in a frame job such as police waiting to have the blood they planted analyzed for typing by the lab in September.  They would have had the blood tested right away instead of bothering with fingerprinting the moderator for so long.  The fact the police thought Sheila did it at the time they woul dhave bneed to plant the evidence also cautions against them having a reason to plant it.  That is a problem on top of the lack of any evidence of planting.

When there are materials to work with a defense attorney can do wonders.  When such materials are lacking a defense attorney can't do nearly as much.

In this case the defense was stuck suggesting that:

1) Sheila got the moderator out herself and installed it then removed it before killing herself and put it away

2) June and Nevill were killed with the moderator attached and though the expert thought it unlikely either had a contact would they nonetheless did and their blood got inside through drawback

3) Somehow their blood failed to intimately mix though no one can establish it is possible for that to happen or explain how unless they were shot a good deal of time apart and the blood thus had time to fully dry before the blood of the other victim entered and some other odd things

4) Though not a ritualistic killing Sheila nothethless went through a ritualistic cleaning process to clean off all blood of the victims and her blood and GSR stained clothing was somehow never found by anyone 

5) She somehow managed to not get any GSR on her gown when she killed herself

6) Hope the jury would ignore she could not have moved her blody flat afte rkilling herself or opened and closes the bible in her own blood.

7) believe that Julie lied in full

Essentially the defense was hoping to get  astupid jury because that is what it takes to win a case like this.

In contrast when the defense has more to work with they can convince a rational jury to acquit and would only lose if the jury is stupid and biased in the opposite manner of the stupid jury that would acquit.   
Thank you for that explanation. Tell me, if Jeremy had sufficient funds (ie a millionaire) would you yourself be prepared to take on his case, or do you think it too hopeless?

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: A Call To Essex Police From Neville? - The poll
« Reply #658 on: October 10, 2014, 08:39:PM »
No answer came the firm reply. ;D

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: A Call To Essex Police From Neville? - The poll
« Reply #659 on: October 10, 2014, 08:42:PM »
hang on this was the middel of summer it wouldent of been dark at that time.