The Week of the Murders

[Adam]

Harters from a innocent stance and a guilty stance I have always thought she should have been charged and serving a prison sentence one if she was telling the truth she could have prevented the murders and saved 5 lives she came out of it ridding herself of a criminal record and a cheque for £25,000 gained from the deaths of 5 innocent people two of them being wee children Shame on her.

Jeremy had a NOTW deal.

And tried to sell pictures of Sheila and his life story to The Sun.

Sick.

[susan]

Adam why I changed my mind was thanks to Caroline and Harters giving me factual information do you not read my posts as I have said all this in detail earlier and not into repeats Adam follow the forum and all the posts

[Adam]

She did not broker a deal.

The police knew nothing about Jeremy's caravan break in. Julie told them.

The police found out about Susan Battersby's 1984 minor cheque book fraud after Julie had completed her WS.

The police had nothing to make her speak.

[No-Bits]

Sorry Harters, I missed this. I agree entirely.

Thought I was on ignore for a minute then.  :D

[Adam]

As I said, delusional.

What deal did she broker ?

And why didn't Jeremy's top lawyers jump all over this ?

[susan]

Adam I AGREE WITH YOU

[Adam]

Adam why I changed my mind was thanks to Caroline and Harters giving me factual information do you not read my posts as I have said all this in detail earlier and not into repeats Adam follow the forum and all the posts

Caroline was a Jeremy supporter until a few weeks ago.

Harters has only created two threads in 6 months. He said himself he only creates threads when he has something worthwhile to say. I admire his honesty.

Thought my threads and posts and Scipio's long posts would have persuaded you. But no, you dug in and fire fighted. Which is commendable.

[susan]

Harters any ideas why Jeremy Bamber did not scream from the rooftops that Julie was telling lies unless of course she knew more about his intentions that we know about and he wanted that kept quiet and knew if he pushed her she would reveal more.

[No-Bits]

What deal did she broker ?

And why didn't Jeremy's top lawyers jump all over this ?

She clearly brokered a deal that she would testify in the case against Jeremy to avoid prosecution.

Jeremy's legal team were representing the defence of Jeremy, not the prosecution of Julie. If they showed Julie up to be guilty, then that wouldn't do Jeremy's defence prospects an favours.

That's a pretty stupid post to be honest.

[Adam]

Harters any ideas why Jeremy Bamber did not scream from the rooftops that Julie was telling lies unless of course she knew more about his intentions that we know about and he wanted that kept quiet and knew if he pushed her she would reveal more.

You need to read posts and remember what they say.

Jeremy said in court Julie stood up in court and lied because he (apparently) jilted her.

I have said this about three times today.

[No-Bits]

Harters any ideas why Jeremy Bamber did not scream from the rooftops that Julie was telling lies unless of course she knew more about his intentions that we know about and he wanted that kept quiet and knew if he pushed her she would reveal more.

I think the defence tried very, very hard to discredit Julie's testimony,  but failed to do so.

I guess it was difficult for Jeremy to make certain allegations without implicating himself.

[susan]

Adam sorry to disappoint you but Caroline has been on the guilty stance much longer than a few weeks I would say months when she came on the forum she thought he was guilty then for a short while innocent then back to guilty where she well and truly sits.  Scipio has raised some good points Adam you have posted loads of information that have been helpful you have put so much work into your threads but sometimes you amaze me with your posts 

[Adam]

She clearly brokered a deal that she would testify in the case against Jeremy to avoid prosecution.

Jeremy's legal team were representing the defence of Jeremy, not the prosecution of Julie. If they showed Julie up to be guilty, then that wouldn't do Jeremy's defence prospects an favours.

That's a pretty stupid post to be honest.

Jeremy had not been arrested when she approached the police.

He was arrested afterwards. So obviously she is going to testify, otherwise why approach the police ?

[No-Bits]

You need to read posts and remember what they say.

Jeremy said in court Julie stood up in court and lied because he (apparently) jilted her.

I have said this about three times today.

Groan. I think you need to wind your neck in a bit. 

[Adam]

I think the defence tried very, very hard to discredit Julie's testimony,  but failed to do so.

I guess it was difficult for Jeremy to make certain allegations without implicating himself.

That included focusing on Susan Battersby's 1984 minor cheque book fraud.