Author Topic: The Week of the Murders  (Read 28418 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: The Week of the Murders
« Reply #75 on: September 05, 2014, 07:17:PM »
Will I have to apologise from now on after every post for supporting Jeremy,or what ?

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Re: The Week of the Murders
« Reply #76 on: September 05, 2014, 07:18:PM »




It's disgusting,Jackie. I don't know what their aim is at all,but they obviously get something out of being abusive. Must be their ghastly lives that they feel insecure in some way with. Would they start bullying a 74 year old in the street ? Makes you think,doesn't it ?


DEAR lookout, they wouldn't get the chance, would they? You'd beat them over the head with your brolly until they submitted and apologized :)

guest154

  • Guest
Re: The Week of the Murders
« Reply #77 on: September 05, 2014, 07:19:PM »

DEAR lookout, they wouldn't get the chance, would they? You'd beat them over the head with your brolly until they submitted and apologized :)


You agree she's being bullied?

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: The Week of the Murders
« Reply #78 on: September 05, 2014, 07:20:PM »
Will I have to apologise from now on after every post for supporting Jeremy,or what ?

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: The Week of the Murders
« Reply #79 on: September 05, 2014, 07:21:PM »

DEAR lookout, they wouldn't get the chance, would they? You'd beat them over the head with your brolly until they submitted and apologized :)




Too right,April. I don't suffer fools-----------

guest154

  • Guest
Re: The Week of the Murders
« Reply #80 on: September 05, 2014, 07:22:PM »
Will I have to apologise from now on after every post for supporting Jeremy,or what ?

I don't care who you support. Bamber. Yorskshire Ripper. Jack The Ripper. Rose West! Doesn't matter to me, you have the right to support whoever you choose to.

You don't have the right to create your own facts though and promote them as truths - thats where the problem is.

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: The Week of the Murders
« Reply #81 on: September 05, 2014, 07:27:PM »
Lomax fought tooth and nail for Michael George,remember !! Was he wrong then ?

I fon't know if he lied with respect to anything about Barry George or not because I have not read any of his claims.

The fact of the matter is that he grossly distorted with respect to the facts of this case and relating to the law of what needed to be proved beyond a reasonable doubt.

George's conviction was not overturned on the basis of most clais mad eby his supporters  It was overturned solely on the basis of a claim that a single particle of GSR suggested he fired the murder weapon.  But much more would be expected if one had recently fired a weapon and it is very easy for a single particle to be transferred.

He was acquitted on retrial because some witnesses were no longer certain like they were previously and there was no physical evidence at all to tie him to firing a weapon, he had no time to have changed so the GSR would still have been on his clothing. 

Lomax completely ignores all the evidence that establishes that Sheial did not kill anyone else, could not have killed herself and everything unfavorable to Jeremy or that makes his claims implausible.  He distorts beyond reason on so many issues it is ridiculous. 



Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: The Week of the Murders
« Reply #82 on: September 05, 2014, 07:28:PM »
I don't care who you support. Bamber. Yorskshire Ripper. Jack The Ripper. Rose West! Doesn't matter to me, you have the right to support whoever you choose to.

You don't have the right to create your own facts though and promote them as truths - thats where the problem is.





This is where you're wrong though because I DON'T and NEVER have created my own facts at all. It probably seems so to a pea-brain such as yourself,but you seem to forget that MY facts are from sources that support Jeremys' innocence,so very different to the ones that you support.
Now do you see where I'm coming from ? No,,I don't suppose you do ! Only you and others like you see the " problem ",but if you look and think hard enough,there's no problem attached to it,only what YOU'VE created in order to suit.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Re: The Week of the Murders
« Reply #83 on: September 05, 2014, 07:30:PM »

You agree she's being bullied?


Mat, I DO think lookout is being got at. POSSIBLY because she doesn't make it clear what/who she's quoting from what she, personally, believes. f she was to say that "WHOEVER" states X,Y and Z and people don't agree, they can only say how they feel about what the author has said and lookout wouldn't get the blame for it. IMO, for what it's worth.

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: The Week of the Murders
« Reply #84 on: September 05, 2014, 07:37:PM »
It's disgusting,Jackie. I don't know what their aim is at all,but they obviously get something out of being abusive. Must be their ghastly lives that they feel insecure in some way with. Would they start bullying a 74 year old in the street ? Makes you think,doesn't it ?

Who is bullying?  People get sick of your trolling.  Day in and day out you post bogus claims ignoring the actual facts and continuously claim there is no evidence though people post the evidence that convicted him time and again everytime you suggest such.

You still won't admit you are wrong and still keep posting the same untruths.  Sheila didn't say she contemplated killing her mother or kids even a single time let alone say such repeatedly over the course of 2 years. She say anythig about killing her mother and said merely she thought she would be capable of killing her sons if they tried to physically harm her. She said that prior to her treatment she had delusions about them.  She never mentioned having any such delusions after she began her treatment.

After beginning her treatment the deusions she had (when she stopped taking her medication) were not about her family.   

This has been pointed out time and time again.  Your claims are baseless and you were made aware of such so each time you continue to make them anyway it makes you a liar.

Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: The Week of the Murders
« Reply #85 on: September 05, 2014, 07:40:PM »

You agree she's being bullied?

anyone can see shes being bullied,

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: The Week of the Murders
« Reply #86 on: September 05, 2014, 07:41:PM »
I don't care who you support. Bamber. Yorskshire Ripper. Jack The Ripper. Rose West! Doesn't matter to me, you have the right to support whoever you choose to.

You don't have the right to create your own facts though and promote them as truths - thats where the problem is.

i see your sex case stalkers back agian lookout.
« Last Edit: September 05, 2014, 07:55:PM by nugnug »

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: The Week of the Murders
« Reply #87 on: September 05, 2014, 07:44:PM »
Who is bullying?  People get sick of your trolling.  Day in and day out you post bogus claims ignoring the actual facts and continuously claim there is no evidence though people post the evidence that convicted him time and again everytime you suggest such.

You still won't admit you are wrong and still keep posting the same untruths.  Sheila didn't say she contemplated killing her mother or kids even a single time let alone say such repeatedly over the course of 2 years. She say anythig about killing her mother and said merely she thought she would be capable of killing her sons if they tried to physically harm her. She said that prior to her treatment she had delusions about them.  She never mentioned having any such delusions after she began her treatment.

After beginning her treatment the deusions she had (when she stopped taking her medication) were not about her family.   

This has been pointed out time and time again.  Your claims are baseless and you were made aware of such so each time you continue to make them anyway it makes you a liar.

anyone with half a brian can see can you are and now im going to do some bullying of my own i think see how you lot like it.
« Last Edit: September 05, 2014, 07:49:PM by nugnug »

guest154

  • Guest
Re: The Week of the Murders
« Reply #88 on: September 05, 2014, 07:48:PM »

Mat, I DO think lookout is being got at. POSSIBLY because she doesn't make it clear what/who she's quoting from what she, personally, believes. f she was to say that "WHOEVER" states X,Y and Z and people don't agree, they can only say how they feel about what the author has said and lookout wouldn't get the blame for it. IMO, for what it's worth.

The problem for me is that she posts a quote from X... And when asked about it, she says is from X. But when X's post is quoted... it's nothing like Lookouts quote.  :-\

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: The Week of the Murders
« Reply #89 on: September 05, 2014, 07:52:PM »

Mat, I DO think lookout is being got at. POSSIBLY because she doesn't make it clear what/who she's quoting from what she, personally, believes. f she was to say that "WHOEVER" states X,Y and Z and people don't agree, they can only say how they feel about what the author has said and lookout wouldn't get the blame for it. IMO, for what it's worth.

Her claims are different than what Lomax said.  At any rate most of Lomax's claims ar esunsupportable and amount to intentional distortions.

Unless Lomax has offers proof that something he says is true ther eis no point in repeating his claims because they amount to unsupported allegations merely.  If he does offer evidence you cite that evidence not him.

The supposed evidence cited is the 1983 release letter which quite clearly can't detail anything that happened the 2 years after the relase because Ferguson did not have a crystal ball.  So it is plainly obvious Loamx was playing games to overplay his hand and not actually suggesting that from 1983 till her death she told Ferguson she was contemplating killing anyone and his claim she contemplate dkilling her kids wasn't accurate either.  There is a difference between contemplating killing someoen and saying you feel you would be cpaable of it if they harmed you.

The suggestion that she was contemplating suicide for the 4 months before she died is no more supportable in fact she never said she contemplated it at all after getting released.  She was discussing her delusions and suicidal thoughts before she was treated.  She didn't say "I am contemplating suicide today" or "yesterday I contemplated suicide" to anyone.



Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry