0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
yes what, point us
Quote from: grahame on March 28, 2011, 05:16:PMQuote from: Hartley on March 28, 2011, 04:07:PMQuote from: mike tesko on March 28, 2011, 03:55:PMFletcher did no work at all, to try and match any of the bullets to any of the bullet cases. What he does say, however, is that he was unable to establish if any of the bullets, had been fired through the silencer - one should not overlook that rather crucial finding...Yes that's true, but he does say that the lack of blood from the the muzzle of the rifle would indicate that the shots were fired when the moderator was attached.But I know you have your theory that test firing would have removed any blood from the muzzle.It just seems illogical to me if it was JB who did the murders why he should put the silencer into the gun cupboard? Why not just get rid of it as there were other silencers in the cupboard. Also if he wanted to make it seem like a suicide then he could easily have smeared the end of the rifle with blood? And remember the police examined his house for blood as well.They is not such thing as the perfect crime, if it was him, he wouldn't have expected his father putting up such a fight...You could argue also, well if the father did call, why not call 999 etc and we could go on and on and if he had got rid of the silencer and Police found this was missing, that would be pointing the finger at him even more as no one else was involved.
Quote from: Hartley on March 28, 2011, 04:07:PMQuote from: mike tesko on March 28, 2011, 03:55:PMFletcher did no work at all, to try and match any of the bullets to any of the bullet cases. What he does say, however, is that he was unable to establish if any of the bullets, had been fired through the silencer - one should not overlook that rather crucial finding...Yes that's true, but he does say that the lack of blood from the the muzzle of the rifle would indicate that the shots were fired when the moderator was attached.But I know you have your theory that test firing would have removed any blood from the muzzle.It just seems illogical to me if it was JB who did the murders why he should put the silencer into the gun cupboard? Why not just get rid of it as there were other silencers in the cupboard. Also if he wanted to make it seem like a suicide then he could easily have smeared the end of the rifle with blood? And remember the police examined his house for blood as well.
Quote from: mike tesko on March 28, 2011, 03:55:PMFletcher did no work at all, to try and match any of the bullets to any of the bullet cases. What he does say, however, is that he was unable to establish if any of the bullets, had been fired through the silencer - one should not overlook that rather crucial finding...Yes that's true, but he does say that the lack of blood from the the muzzle of the rifle would indicate that the shots were fired when the moderator was attached.But I know you have your theory that test firing would have removed any blood from the muzzle.
Fletcher did no work at all, to try and match any of the bullets to any of the bullet cases. What he does say, however, is that he was unable to establish if any of the bullets, had been fired through the silencer - one should not overlook that rather crucial finding...
