Author Topic: Action 116 - DS Stan Jones...  (Read 3280 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Action 116 - DS Stan Jones...
« on: August 10, 2014, 02:38:PM »
...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

No-Bits

  • Guest
Re: Action 116 - DS Stan Jones...
« Reply #1 on: September 25, 2014, 04:57:PM »
What is this document? A report, statement. Date?

Any ideas?  ???

guest154

  • Guest
Re: Action 116 - DS Stan Jones...
« Reply #2 on: September 25, 2014, 05:01:PM »
17/9/85

No-Bits

  • Guest
Re: Action 116 - DS Stan Jones...
« Reply #3 on: September 25, 2014, 05:25:PM »
17/9/85

Oh yeah, didn't see that.  :-[

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: Action 116 - DS Stan Jones...
« Reply #4 on: September 25, 2014, 06:10:PM »
What is noteworthy is that Jeremy was put on notice of the bullet discrepancy right away and yet was not able to think up a lie by the trial either or even after the trial to acocunt for the extra bullets. 

It is quite obvious that he staged these bullets after committing the murders.  He didn't keep track of how many shots he fired and thus didn't try to make the number of bullets missing match.  It wound up being one of the mistakes he could have avoided had he planned better.
Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

guest154

  • Guest
Re: Action 116 - DS Stan Jones...
« Reply #5 on: September 25, 2014, 06:42:PM »
What is noteworthy is that Jeremy was put on notice of the bullet discrepancy right away and yet was not able to think up a lie by the trial either or even after the trial to acocunt for the extra bullets. 

It is quite obvious that he staged these bullets after committing the murders.  He didn't keep track of how many shots he fired and thus didn't try to make the number of bullets missing match.  It wound up being one of the mistakes he could have avoided had he planned better.

It's a great point that sticks out like a sore thumb, the bullets were undoubtedbly staged.

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: Action 116 - DS Stan Jones...
« Reply #6 on: September 25, 2014, 07:28:PM »
It's a great point that sticks out like a sore thumb, the bullets were undoubtedbly staged.

Which means his story about taking the gun out along with these bullets to shoot rabbits and leaving it out along with the bullets was also entirely made up.  Why was it mad eup?  To frame Sheila and how could he have staged these bullets unless he was the killer?

The funny thing is that despite needing to make up a lie to account for this he was never able to.
Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: Action 116 - DS Stan Jones...
« Reply #7 on: September 25, 2014, 10:29:PM »
So even on the 17th of September Julie tells Jones that Jeremy rang her at 3:30..... :-\ :-\ :-\ :-\

No-Bits

  • Guest
Re: Action 116 - DS Stan Jones...
« Reply #8 on: September 25, 2014, 11:37:PM »

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: Action 116 - DS Stan Jones...
« Reply #9 on: September 25, 2014, 11:51:PM »
So even on the 17th of September Julie tells Jones that Jeremy rang her at 3:30..... :-\ :-\ :-\ :-\

No when came clean to police she changed the time and noted 3:12 but attributed such to a roomate:

"I have since spoken to Susan and I feel sure that she told me the time that Jeremy phoned was 3:12am."

The part of the interview you are referring to was simply using the times already written in the past not saying she was reaffirming such times.  The actual section where she discussed the time had the above quote.

She left out that Susan kept her clock 10 minutes fast which required an adjustment to 10 minutes earlier.  So that is why it was changed again subsequently.  She subsequently spoke to her other roomates as well one of who said the hour was 2 and she did not recall the minutes though presumably it had to be close to 3 and another who said 3:15. Julie didn't remember the time so she deferred to her roomates that is the clear implication of referencing them over and over again in her various statements and police spoke to them as well of course and confrimed the clock was 10 minutes fast.



 

Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Mr. Gee

  • Guest
Re: Action 116 - DS Stan Jones...
« Reply #10 on: September 26, 2014, 12:05:AM »
No when came clean to police she changed the time and noted 3:12 but attributed such to a roomate:

"I have since spoken to Susan and I feel sure that she told me the time that Jeremy phoned was 3:12am."

The part of the interview you are referring to was simply using the times already written in the past not saying she was reaffirming such times.  The actual section where she discussed the time had the above quote.

She left out that Susan kept her clock 10 minutes fast which required an adjustment to 10 minutes earlier.  So that is why it was changed again subsequently.  She subsequently spoke to her other roomates as well one of who said the hour was 2 and she did not recall the minutes though presumably it had to be close to 3 and another who said 3:15. Julie didn't remember the time so she deferred to her roomates that is the clear implication of referencing them over and over again in her various statements and police spoke to them as well of course and confrimed the clock was 10 minutes fast.



 
Unfortunately the times are so mixed up and even one of the tenents in JM's flat said 3.30 that it appears that the timing cannot really be trusted?

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: Action 116 - DS Stan Jones...
« Reply #11 on: September 26, 2014, 04:18:PM »
Unfortunately the times are so mixed up and even one of the tenents in JM's flat said 3.30 that it appears that the timing cannot really be trusted?

None of them said 3:30.  Upon being badgered one said it could have been as late as 3:30 but thought it was 3:15.  One was adamant the hour began with a 2 and another insisted it was 3:12 which meant 3:02.  The last said 3:15 though it could have been as late as 3:30.

Jerey was on phone with police at 3:30 and the call began prior to 3:26 so quite obviously his call to Julie predated his call to police as she asserted. 

The roomate who said it was 3:15 but could have been as late as 3:30 was less certain than the other 2 who insist they looked at ther clocks.

The timing of those 2 place the call well before calling police and even more damning before the time he claims Nevill called him.

Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Action 116 - DS Stan Jones...
« Reply #12 on: September 26, 2014, 05:02:PM »
How long do you think that Sheila had been dead for before she was found ?

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: Action 116 - DS Stan Jones...
« Reply #13 on: September 26, 2014, 05:25:PM »
How long do you think that Sheila had been dead for before she was found ?

If Jeremy called Julie around 3 instead of 3:15 that obviously means he had to get home sooner.  He would have left WHF by 2:40 to be able to call around 3.  So her death would have been 2:20-2:30 presumably and then he took time to stage the bullets and think about what else he wanted to do.

While it is possible Jeremy started the murders earlier than 2AM I seriously doubt it.  That would have required him wasting too much time before calling Julie and police.  The more time he wasted the better the chance of police figuring out they died before the time Nevill allegedly called him.

So I think all the murders happened sometime between between 2AM and 2:30Am and that Jeremy left by 2:40AM. He either got home and changed and washed up some more then called Julie or called Julie then changed and finally called police.  He also likely practiced what he would tell police before he called thus resulting in more of a gap between calling Julie and police.

   
Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Action 116 - DS Stan Jones...
« Reply #14 on: September 26, 2014, 05:51:PM »
If Jeremy called Julie around 3 instead of 3:15 that obviously means he had to get home sooner.  He would have left WHF by 2:40 to be able to call around 3.  So her death would have been 2:20-2:30 presumably and then he took time to stage the bullets and think about what else he wanted to do.

While it is possible Jeremy started the murders earlier than 2AM I seriously doubt it.  That would have required him wasting too much time before calling Julie and police.  The more time he wasted the better the chance of police figuring out they died before the time Nevill allegedly called him.

So I think all the murders happened sometime between between 2AM and 2:30Am and that Jeremy left by 2:40AM. He either got home and changed and washed up some more then called Julie or called Julie then changed and finally called police.  He also likely practiced what he would tell police before he called thus resulting in more of a gap between calling Julie and police.

 





I disagree that Sheila had been dead for 6/7 ? hours before being found. Have you ever seen a body that has lain dead for this length of time ? Especially a once active one ?