Author Topic: Why would he?  (Read 10630 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #75 on: August 01, 2014, 10:09:PM »
Yeha that would not look suspicious her visiting at a time she would have been working the next day and he would have been working so not a time wehn she wa sknown to visit and yet the very day of the murders is when it happens.  That too is worse than claiming being alone sleeping.

 

she could of aranged some time of work acording to her they had plenty of time to plan it.

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #76 on: August 01, 2014, 10:11:PM »
they could of easly aranged an albi way in advance she could of come down and spent the night there to give him an albi.

acording to her he told her he was planing a long time before the murder so they would of had plenty of time to set up an albi together.

Then he would have to have admitted HE did it and he would have to have selected the exact day in advance as opposed to picking a day of opportunity like he did.  You are asusming she would have helped him though ther eis no guarantee she would have. 

Worse yet whatever they come up with would be DIFFERENT from their usual schedule. Deviating from their usual schedule exactly when the murders occur is supicious. Her visiting out of the blue to provide an alibi would be extremely transparent.
Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #77 on: August 01, 2014, 10:14:PM »
of course she would of helped him acording to her story she prepared to help drug them all and she lied for him afterwoods.

why wouldent she of provided him with an albi as well.

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #78 on: August 01, 2014, 10:14:PM »
Then he would have to have admitted HE did it and he would have to have selected the exact day in advance as opposed to picking a day of opportunity like he did.  You are asusming she would have helped him though ther eis no guarantee she would have. 

Worse yet whatever they come up with would be DIFFERENT from their usual schedule. Deviating from their usual schedule exactly when the murders occur is supicious. Her visiting out of the blue to provide an alibi would be extremely transparent.

Naaah - she was such a performer she 100% would have got away with it.

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #79 on: August 01, 2014, 10:17:PM »
of course she would of helped him acording to her story she prepared to help drug them all and she lied for him afterwoods.

why wouldent she of provided him with an albi as well.

She denies that she gave him the drugs to use on his family.  Whether she would have helpe dhim only she knows though she says she would not have and there is no alibi that she could have provided that would nto have been worthless and totally transparent. 
Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #80 on: August 01, 2014, 10:19:PM »
His alibi was that he was home and his proof was being home to receive a call from Nevill.  The fact you are either too dishonest to admit this too  dumb to realize is says volumes about you.
Really scipio you really must buy a dictionary as your vocabulary appears to be very limited? Well I suppose grunts don't need to have much intelligence do they?
I cannot appear to find anywhere that Jeremy used the word "alibi", could you please assist me and find it for me. For as far as I can see he never once used this as his defence. But I can remember the prosecution using it though.
Oh by the way,
Wake up Dinozzo.
« Last Edit: August 01, 2014, 10:20:PM by Grahame »

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #81 on: August 01, 2014, 10:21:PM »
she could of come down stayed in the cottage while did the murders then said he was with her all night.

Her being at the flat with the other flat mates, meant that not only could Julie corroborate the call, but so could the others.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #82 on: August 01, 2014, 10:22:PM »
She denies that she gave him the drugs to use on his family.  Whether she would have helpe dhim only she knows though she says she would not have and there is no alibi that she could have provided that would nto have been worthless and totally transparent.

He denys the whole conversation so yet again "hearsay"

Love to stay so you can run  round me but have a long day tomorrow having to take a family member for an operation.
so end of the evening for me.Dont tire your self out running round in circles

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #83 on: August 01, 2014, 10:22:PM »
She denies that she gave him the drugs to use on his family.  Whether she would have helpe dhim only she knows though she says she would not have and there is no alibi that she could have provided that would nto have been worthless and totally transparent.

if she had said he was with her that would of been albi enough for most policeman rember that they would have to prove she was lying.

and there was no way on earth they could of done.
« Last Edit: August 01, 2014, 10:23:PM by nugnug »

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #84 on: August 01, 2014, 10:23:PM »
Really scipio you really must buy a dictionary as your vocabulary appears to be very limited? Well I suppose grunts don't need to have much intelligence do they?
I cannot appear to find anywhere that Jeremy used the word "alibi", could you please assist me and find it for me. For as far as I can see he never once used this as his defence. But I can remember the prosecution using it though.
Oh by the way,
Wake up Dinozzo.

It's on his own website - http://www.jeremy-bamber.co.uk/alibis-1
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #85 on: August 01, 2014, 10:30:PM »
It's on his own website - http://www.jeremy-bamber.co.uk/alibis-1
So nowhere has Jeremy himself said he had an alibi then? Although as you have pointed out his own team have said that. So how is that phone call an alibi then? It would only be an alibi if he could back up what he said? So in effect he had no alibi did he.
In fact he would have had an actual alibi if he had done nothing. But I simply cannot see how such a phone call to his father could count as an alibi even if his official site tean said so? I don't agree with them pure and simple.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #86 on: August 01, 2014, 10:34:PM »
So nowhere has Jeremy himself said he had an alibi then? Although as you have pointed out his own team have said that. So how is that phone call an alibi then? It would only be an alibi if he could back up what he said? So in effect he had no alibi did he.
In fact he would have had an actual alibi if he had done nothing. But I simply cannot see how such a phone call to his father could count as an alibi even if his official site tean said so? I don't agree with them pure and simple.

The very fact that he indicated he was somewhere else when the murders occurred means he is providing himself with an alibi. I really don't understand what point you are trying to make here?
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #87 on: August 01, 2014, 10:36:PM »
He denys the whole conversation so yet again "hearsay"

Love to stay so you can run  round me but have a long day tomorrow having to take a family member for an operation.
so end of the evening for me.Dont tire your self out running round in circles

You are the one running in circles not me.

Your claim an alibi that was credible could have easily been crafted between them is nonsense.  Staying over at the time of the murders to lie and say he never left would be suspicious and of little use since she could have been lying for him.  Indee dit coudl be suggested in that case that she went to help him.

Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #88 on: August 01, 2014, 10:38:PM »
you couldent of proved it wasnt true.

to do that they would have to find somone who saw him elsewhere.

highly unlikely at that time of night.
« Last Edit: August 01, 2014, 10:39:PM by nugnug »

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #89 on: August 01, 2014, 10:43:PM »
Her being at the flat with the other flat mates, meant that not only could Julie corroborate the call, but so could the others.
Still a bit of an oversite on his part. I rather think it unfortunate that she wasn't staying with him that night. Otherwise it is obvious that nothing that happened that night could have helped Jeremy could it? No alibi and nothing that even smacks of an alibi. He may either have been a very very dim boy? Or innocent all together?