You my dear scipio are just guessing. You really have no idea of what people are capable of do you. Ralph was by your own scenario already wounded badly with two or three bullets in him. Also you said he had a broken arm. Those bullets alone would incapacitate him. It wouldn't take sheila much strength to finish him off. No I don't think it was a violent struggle as the prosecution suggested as Ralph was already very weak. If Bamber had no injuries and was guilty. In other words no signs of a struggle with Ralph, then exactly the same could be said of Sheila. You can have it both ways mate. And not so much of the dumb supporters either. Someone is not dumb just because they don't accept your embellished scenarios.
Jeremy supporters try to have it both ways not me.
Jeremy did not have long nails to breka while SHeila did so while SHeila's nails would have broken under such circumstances Jeremy had no nails to break
Jeremy would have been wearing gloves thus would have mitigated any injuries that would have resulted from punching Nevill or from the rifle when stock broke esactly where the killer would have been holding it. Sheila would not have been wearing gloves thus would have been wounded by that breka and would have had abrasions from punching Nevill. In addiiton Sheila would have letft her prints in the blood that was on the rifle since she had no gloves while Jeremy would not since he wore gloves.
The killer deifnitely owuld have had medium vemolicyt spatter from bludgeoning nevill it got on the rifle and wound have gotten on the killer as well. Sheil didn't have a reaosn to change let alone opportunity to go dispose of her bloody clothing outside the house somethwere not to be found while Jeremy did have a reson to change and the ability to change upon arrivig home.
These are the salient points.
