The fact there is no history of violence by JB at all is interesting to me. Surely a person capable of such violence in a cold blooded and calculating way would have shown signs of violence to partners etc before? There is usually a history of escalating violence rather than crime in general.
I know he had never been violent, but he still crossed a line. I wonder why he did it, the loot wasn´t that great. Rehearsal to test his nerve?
I never liked this break-in, it is in the back of my mind and is one contributing factor to me being on the fence about the killings.
There is something else I read about that bothers me. I only remember it vaguely, and I don´t remember where I read it. It was about Jeremy spying on the house of a couple. He would sit in his car, as far as I recall. This is all I can remember. Can anyone help me?