Was there still enough evidence without the silencer ?

[grahameb]

Why have you posted Jeremys WS. What has that got to do with his appalling attitude when interviewed.

My view with the police interview is Jeremy knew he was guilty. He also knew the police knew he was guilty. So there was no point pretending.

Which explained his singing answers etc. Thread link above.

However Jeremy was not going to admit anything. There was money to inherit.  The police were going to have to get a guilty verdict in court. You know what ? They did.

And by the way why did you post the link anyway. We were talking about you accusing Jeremy of changing his statement about his father's alleged phone call to the police and why he thought he had phoned the police and what I posted was the real reason he used that in order to try and get an appeal. That it was not Jeremy "changing his mind". But rather the ambiguous words used in that second telephone log. Which to my mind as well was very misleading.

[lookout]

 Jeremy can't win in your eyes. If his head had been bowed during his INTERROGATION,you'd have said he was definitely guilty. But because he was cocky about answering questions,it showed a bad attitude towards guilt.
At the funeral was the same. Because he wasn't blubbering over everyones' shoulder,you said he was guilty,if he had have been,he'd have still been guilty.
The press were in his face every step of the way.The case was media-driven,,what chance did he have ?

Did you see the two Princes crying openly at their mothers' funeral ? NO,neither did I.  It's the way a person is brought up,not to make a show of themselves in public.Or didn't you know that ?

Usually,tears are for the guilty ones like the odious Philpotts and their crocodile tears !

[lookout]

 Keep spinning Spider,you'll eventually trap yourself in your own web !

[nugnug]

Jeremy can't win in your eyes. If his head had been bowed during his INTERROGATION,you'd have said he was definitely guilty. But because he was cocky about answering questions,it showed a bad attitude towards guilt.
At the funeral was the same. Because he wasn't blubbering over everyones' shoulder,you said he was guilty,if he had have been,he'd have still been guilty.
The press were in his face every step of the way.The case was media-driven,,what chance did he have ?

Did you see the two Princes crying openly at their mothers' funeral ? NO,neither did I.  It's the way a person is brought up,not to make a show of themselves in public.Or didn't you know that ?

Usually,tears are for the guilty ones like the odious Philpotts and their crocodile tears !

if you dont cry its called no emotion if you do cry its called crocdile tears.

[lookout]

if you dont cry its called no emotion if you do cry its called crocdile tears.

He couldn't win,nugs. Damned if he did and damned if he didn't.

[Alias]

Police were very suspicious of Colin Caffell because he seemed so calm in the aftermath of the murders. It is a known fact that people never react as you are "supposed to" during grieving. Differs from person to person, so it is futile to try to read anything into people´s behaviour.

[nugnug]

and when people do cry they all cry in diffrent ways.

[Alias]

and when people do cry they all cry in diffrent ways.

They do - and sometimes crying sounds like laughter...

[nugnug]

Police were very suspicious of Colin Caffell because he seemed so calm in the aftermath of the murders. It is a known fact that people never react as you are "supposed to" during grieving. Differs from person to person, so it is futile to try to read anything into people´s behaviour.

it probely hadent sunk in yet delayed shock.

[Alias]

it probely hadent sunk in yet delayed shock.

That´s right. The reaction came much later. It is a lot to take in. Also for Jeremy...

[lookout]

 It's almost like hysteria,where a sudden intake of breath can sound like a laugh and,or a cry. A delayed reactionary shock.

[Alias]

It's almost like hysteria,where a sudden intake of breath can sound like a laugh and,or a cry. A delayed reactionary shock.

I actually laugh when I am in shock - has happened more than once.

[lookout]

I actually laugh when I am in shock - has happened more than once.

Some people do,Alias. I've known some who've smiled at being given bad news,,but it's of no consequence that they do this as those who understand grief and the like know that people act differently,so aren't offended by it.
Those who don't understand peoples' various reactions are the ones who are dangerous,and start spreading gossip and lies.

[Jan]

Why have you posted Jeremys WS. What has that got to do with his appalling attitude when interviewed.

My view with the police interview is Jeremy knew he was guilty. He also knew the police knew he was guilty. So there was no point pretending.

Which explained his singing answers etc. Thread link above.

However Jeremy was not going to admit anything. There was money to inherit.  The police were going to have to get a guilty verdict in court. You know what ? They did.

Singing answers? What a strange description.

Adam your main problem is that you do not for one moment put yourself in the position of JB IF he was innocent. You have no empathy for any one else in any situation , unless you think it is how you would react - which is in my opinion very short sighted.

And yes they did convict - So as Caroline posted why are you trying to convict him all over again?

You don't actually ask questions and even consider the replies or documents you are shown - you have your "pat" answers in reserve just waiting to post them again.

It is not the sign of an enquiring mind , so I can only conclude that you do have a vested interest in the case because otherwise why do you bother.

[Adam]

Singing answers? What a strange description.

Adam your main problem is that you do not for one moment put yourself in the position of JB IF he was innocent. You have no empathy for any one else in any situation , unless you think it is how you would react - which is in my opinion very short sighted.

And yes they did convict - So as Caroline posted why are you trying to convict him all over again?

You don't actually ask questions and even consider the replies or documents you are shown - you have your "pat" answers in reserve just waiting to post them again.

It is not the sign of an enquiring mind , so I can only conclude that you do have a vested interest in the case because otherwise why do you bother.

If you read my threads. The last line nearly always asks everyone a question.

Yes. The police said his answers were said in a singing tone. Yeeeees, noooo etc. While he chewed on a thread from his jumper.

The police said they would have got a confession if everything was slowed down by writing. This I do not believe. Jeremy was much too determined.  Threads already created.