Author Topic: The police's 'late late' framing decision. Why was it taken ?  (Read 5799 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44486
Re: The police's 'late late' framing decision. Why was it taken ?
« Reply #30 on: June 21, 2014, 08:35:PM »
Rich people never stop wanting more - that´s why they are rich!

Poor people that have not got the motivation of talent to get rich (of both), will commit crimes. Even robbing from their own family 
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: The police's 'late late' framing decision. Why was it taken ?
« Reply #31 on: June 21, 2014, 08:36:PM »
http://youtu.be/BLedeOGdj2U

Showing the relatives were wealthy in their right and had no reason to lie.

Do you think the relatives framed Jeremy ?

I am not saying the relatives framed Jeremy - I don´t know, but to claim that just because people have money, they don´t want more is absurd. The world just doesn´t work that way.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17253
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: The police's 'late late' framing decision. Why was it taken ?
« Reply #32 on: June 21, 2014, 08:42:PM »
http://youtu.be/BLedeOGdj2U

Showing the relatives were wealthy in their right and had no reason to lie.

Do you think the relatives framed Jeremy ?

that gives no evedence that were weathly in there own right other than they claimed to be.
« Last Edit: June 21, 2014, 08:46:PM by nugnug »

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: The police's 'late late' framing decision. Why was it taken ?
« Reply #33 on: June 21, 2014, 08:51:PM »
Alias/Adam (has a ring to it) I am not saying anyone was lying but had Jeremy taken possession of what he was left  he would have owned land the rellies farmed and also he was not considered one of them and they would not have been happy about him owning the farm and the land etc.  Sad but true.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44486
Re: The police's 'late late' framing decision. Why was it taken ?
« Reply #34 on: June 21, 2014, 08:51:PM »
I am not saying the relatives framed Jeremy - I don´t know, but to claim that just because people have money, they don´t want more is absurd. The world just doesn´t work that way.

There are lots of reasons why the relatives would 'not' and could 'not' frame Jeremy. Just posted.

It seems the only reason they would is for financial gain. Although they were already wealthy.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: The police's 'late late' framing decision. Why was it taken ?
« Reply #35 on: June 21, 2014, 08:52:PM »
I am not saying the relatives framed Jeremy - I don´t know, but to claim that just because people have money, they don´t want more is absurd. The world just doesn´t work that way.

the same could have been said for Jeremy - he was not badly off and would have inherited from Granny Bamber without the risk of life in prison.

The more you think about it the more ludicrous it gets.

How many mass murderers that are not mentally ill do you know that committed a crime so bad and so risky as this without any prior record or evidence of violence. Even All the things that he were supposed of said about the murder of his parents are not co-oberated .

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44486
Re: The police's 'late late' framing decision. Why was it taken ?
« Reply #36 on: June 21, 2014, 08:53:PM »
that gives no evedence that were weathly in there own right other than they claimed to be.

The relatives are not saying it. A pro Jeremy video is saying it.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: The police's 'late late' framing decision. Why was it taken ?
« Reply #37 on: June 21, 2014, 08:54:PM »
Alias hope he never needs a blood transfusion in a hurry wont be much of that in the blood bank ;D ;D ;D

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17253
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: The police's 'late late' framing decision. Why was it taken ?
« Reply #38 on: June 21, 2014, 08:57:PM »
The relatives are not saying it. A pro Jeremy video is saying it.

yes i watched it it wasn't claiming that.

the only evedence it showed that they were wealthy is they cliamed to be.

thats hardly evedence.
« Last Edit: June 21, 2014, 08:58:PM by nugnug »

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44486
Re: The police's 'late late' framing decision. Why was it taken ?
« Reply #39 on: June 21, 2014, 09:03:PM »
the same could have been said for Jeremy - he was not badly off and would have inherited from Granny Bamber without the risk of life in prison.

The more you think about it the more ludicrous it gets.

How many mass murderers that are not mentally ill do you know that committed a crime so bad and so risky as this without any prior record or evidence of violence. Even All the things that he were supposed of said about the murder of his parents are not co-oberated .

As far as Jeremy was concerned he was badly off. Having to work long hours on a farm in the 'loads of money' 80's. While Sheila lived rent free in London. Several people testified how he 'hated' his family.
« Last Edit: June 21, 2014, 09:04:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: The police's 'late late' framing decision. Why was it taken ?
« Reply #40 on: June 21, 2014, 09:03:PM »
 Maybe if the relatives had been fully aware of the backgrounds of both June and Sheila,,then they wouldn't have had doubts about the killer in the first place.
Their bone of contention in all of this was their sheer disbelief in Sheila as having been capable of killing,,caused by the critical illness that they DIDN'T know she had.


Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17253
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: The police's 'late late' framing decision. Why was it taken ?
« Reply #41 on: June 21, 2014, 09:05:PM »
they dident care who the killer was they just wanted the cash.

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: The police's 'late late' framing decision. Why was it taken ?
« Reply #42 on: June 21, 2014, 09:07:PM »
Alias/Adam (has a ring to it) I am not saying anyone was lying but had Jeremy taken possession of what he was left  he would have owned land the rellies farmed and also he was not considered one of them and they would not have been happy about him owning the farm and the land etc.  Sad but true.

I was just thinking about that. It would have been intolerable for them.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17253
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: The police's 'late late' framing decision. Why was it taken ?
« Reply #43 on: June 21, 2014, 09:11:PM »
if the relatives were wealthy how come they had to approach nevile.

to get him to buy the land why couldn't they have done it themselves.
« Last Edit: June 21, 2014, 09:12:PM by nugnug »

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: The police's 'late late' framing decision. Why was it taken ?
« Reply #44 on: June 21, 2014, 09:14:PM »
 Questionable,nugs.