The murder of 14 year-old schoolgirl Jodi Jones near Edinburgh on 30 June 2003

[gordo30]

We know how you got them and from whom, of course nothing illegal occurred but it is what you do with the information you have now, simply using it as some big stick that holds no relevance within the case in question is pretty low.

[nugnug]

well we will have to wait and see.

[Lugg]

I'm still waiting to see these jokes that Sandra L was supposed to have said.

[gordo30]

Lugg what ever was contained in those personal messages should remain personal,theres no way to tell in just what context things were written  without the relevant series of pm's or the public material they may have related to. The fact that many were jocular suggest's that things may have been said without much thought or due process a right all of us have under the circumstance's.

Just like nugnug knows im SK? youre right though, ill drop it. so... what's the latest with the SCCRC then? I heard "the box" was underwhelming...

Not like this at all.

The SCCRC has accepted the case for review so It is a wait and see what they come up with, Its hard to know just what route they will take but were sure that they will be thorough in their investigations.

[Lugg]

Lugg what ever was contained in those personal messages should remain personal,theres no way to tell in just what context things were written  without the relevant series of pm's or the public material they may have related to. The fact that many were jocular suggest's that things may have been said without much thought or due process a right all of us have under the circumstance's.

Not like this at all.

The SCCRC has accepted the case for review so It is a wait and see what they come up with, Its hard to know just what route they will take but were sure that they will be thorough in thier investigations.

Well in my estimation Lithium should not have posted the accusation on open forum. I shall report it to the moderators.

[gordo30]

Well of course your right he shouldn't have but Lithium was no more than a tool (no insult intended) here to further someones objective in discrediting the source of any of these pm's. This does however mean that he should have been smart and realised that as with the 1st pm he put up that it had been photoshopped to look like it had came from Steph's email only and of course that wasn't the case. There is something fishy about the jokes also but I will let him proceed with whichever route he may take, just don't leave yourself open.

[Lugg]

No you don't. You were all very quick to just happily accept my explanation that someone sent me them. Great detectives you lot are! Did you know the word 'gullible' doesn't appear in the dictionary?

I'm no one's tool, and no one "sent me" to do or disrupt anything.

But you still made an accusation with no proof. In my book that is termed "libel".

[nugnug]

i woulden delve to deeply into the subject of whats been said in private pms and emails anyway.

i mean you never know whos been reading yours

[Lithium]

i mean you never know whos been reading yours

[nugnug]

your rather pathetic attempts to bully people into to forgetting abouthi arnt t going to work you.

[Lugg]

I have proof, even Gordo and nugnug know I'm probably telling the truth, Gordo's even telling you to stop encouraging me to post it, and trying to defend Sandra.

In that case, if you are not prepared to prove your accusation you must withdraw it, or it becomes no more than libel. If that was me that you accused I would have instructed a solicitor to investigate you and send you a letter of warning. But then that is up to Dr. Sandra Lean?

[Lugg]

I won't withdraw it, sorry. I don't care if you, Lugg, don't believe me. Sandra knows.

It isn't a matter of believing or disbelieving you. I'm just pointing out to you what the law says about libel and that you are running the risk of a summons by Dr. Lean.

[gordo30]

Quote from: Anonymous on Today at 06:36 PM

    I have proof, even Gordo and nugnug know I'm probably telling the truth, Gordo's even telling you to stop encouraging me to post it, and trying to defend Sandra.

On the contrary I am wanting you to post it as I know there is something wrong with it!!

[gordo30]

But you still made an accusation with no proof. In my book that is termed "libel".

That is indeed the problem with messing around with pm's, how do you prove whos they are in this world of computer generated options and such!! Why is he deleting his post's it kinda makes it confusing?

[nugnug]

if anybody managed to copy and save those posts please pm me.