I know he hasn't denied his sperm being present, but ask Sandra where the "it was Kellys semen on Jodi's bra" theory originally came from. There is nothing in the evidence stating the DNA on the bra is his at all.
Lithium could you provide a source please?
You continually call Sandra Lean a liar, knowing that the law is against her to post certain evidence/documents etc publicly. She provides what she can, within the law, so that the public can make an informed decision themselves as to whether Luke Mitchell could be innocent of this crime. This woman has put everything into this case, (and others), for truth and justice. Why would you or anyone else want to have a go at her for that?
To my knowledge she has no family that has been a miscarriage of justice victim, but yet she does what she does to help people who have had their lives torn apart due to the system getting it wrong. I think I can speak on behalf of many people that we need people like Sandra Lean. The abuse that she has had to endure over the years by certain people for supporting moj victims and their families has been disgusting, the least she deserves is respect, IMO, and not being called a liar.
My take on it was that it was a full DNA match for Kelly on the teeshirt, I am unsure what the result was for the semen on the bra.
