The murder of 14 year-old schoolgirl Jodi Jones near Edinburgh on 30 June 2003

[gordo30]

I think I will conclude discussion here on this case for now. It was obvious that another agenda was in place from the start, too many fundamental mistakes, similar to what occurred when the last application was submitted.

[sandra L]

defending Corinnes lies with an irrelevant dig at Jodi's family. Class act, Sandra.

A perfect example of my last post, Lithium! It's not irrelevant, and it's not a dig! Two fourteen year old kids were "breaking the law" by smoking cigarettes and cannabis. A member of Jodi's family was known to be dealing large amounts of cannabis, Luke shared some of his with his friends! Members of Jodi's extended family were known to be dealing cannabis.

If smoking cigarettes and cannabis, or dealing cannabis, are relevant to this case, then it is relevant to all of those who were doing so.

[sandra L]

Oh not you as well.  Everyone seems to be playing this game on there this week. 

No, sorry, Mat, I wasn't playing guess the poster - that should have been a private message to Lithium. I apologise.

[nugnug]

A perfect example of my last post, Lithium! It's not irrelevant, and it's not a dig! Two fourteen year old kids were "breaking the law" by smoking cigarettes and cannabis. A member of Jodi's family was known to be dealing large amounts of cannabis, Luke shared some of his with his friends! Members of Jodi's extended family were known to be dealing cannabis.

If smoking cigarettes and cannabis, or dealing cannabis, are relevant to this case, then it is relevant to all of those who were doing so.

well it has to be.

[gordo30]

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/sarcasm

Here I have done the work for you. Read it and decide for yourself. Then maybe your could give me your opinion of what it was but I suspect I will receive another question.

Are you Mr Dobbie?

[gordo30]

I think you will find that has already been online m8 on  a forum similar to this one, you think im really bothered. I am gordon graham, everyone knows that that should.

[gordo30]

Like I said I don't care what you post relating to me post away. It was an attempt to stop you asking questions and getting us to do the work for you. The ironic thing is that if you read the definition on sarcasm you would see that the post about your computer skills was not sacastic but the post on its definition was.

[gordo30]

You have provided no proof that he is guilty.

The work you want us to do for you seems to be answer question after question but receive no  reply or opinion on the answer. That and troll the internet looking out things you feel we should.

[gordo30]

Can't someone just believe Luke is guilty?

I must say that must be frustrating as here we have a public forum that anyone can join and it seems your on your lonesome in regards to the guilty argument.

[guest154]

Can't someone just believe Luke is guilty?

I must say that must be frustrating as here we have a public forum that anyone can join and it seems your on your lonesome in regards to the guilty argument.

 

[gordo30]

I read that you had quit discussion on this topic mat.

[gordo30]

Everyone in the area knows he did it. Everyone relevant to the case knows he did it.

This must be torture for you then as I happen to know people in the area that don't. There are many people relevant to the case including a pathologist who believe that Luke is innocent.

[guest154]

I read that you had quit discussion on this topic mat.

I was noticing that not all posts were being honest. So it was hard to debate against ever changing facts. I haven't quit - but I don't see the point in getting stuck in. Plus I've been busy elsewhere on the board. 

[gordo30]

Then why discuss it? I feel you are an intellegent lad and therefore surely if you believe that Luke is guilty but lets say you were interested in why some feel he is innocent then simply reading the various forums would allow you to form a reason as to why we feel that way.

There may of course be another reason for your input, I don't know.

[gordo30]

Everyone in the area knows he did it. Everyone relevant to the case knows he did it.

Then you are from the area  and close to the family am I correct?