The murder of 14 year-old schoolgirl Jodi Jones near Edinburgh on 30 June 2003

[nugnug]

he never made any statement and wasn't asked to that's why everyone else statements are being quoted
and not his.

How do you assert with 100% accuracy that Joseph Jones did not give a statement?
Where did you get this information from? Please provide a source or forever hold your tongue. Again it is idle speculation.

ive stated my reason for saying it so bollocks.

your going to be offended by that arnt you.
And why does it matter so much to you?

[Janet]

http://www.berwick-advertiser.co.uk/news/local-headlines/lengthy_ban_for_drink_driver_caught_on_holiday_park_road_1_1576028

What relevence has this got to do with the murder conviction?

its as relevant as stuff you have posted.

Don't talk nonsense. Anything I have posted relates to the case. The link you posted is nothing to do with case at all.

[nugnug]

it relates to gordon dickie and seem to have hit a nerve there.

its in the public domain so why shouldent i post it.

[Janet]

Your reasons for saying Joseph Jones did not have an alibi is because his mother and her partner went to the grave yard and the police did not speak to him as you claim.

Have you any proof to show what you are saying is true?

Do you know for 100% that he had no alibi or was not spoken to by police?

What legal status would your speculation have in any court?

[Janet]

it relates to gordon dickie and seem to have hit a nerve there.

its in the public domain so why shouldent i post it.

I asked what relevence does it have to this murder conviction?

[nugnug]

http://caseblog.wronglyaccusedperson.org.uk/luke-mitchell-is-innocent/no-smoke/

[Janet]

Can you not answer the questions I asked nugnug?

Here they are again

Your reasons for saying Joseph Jones did not have an alibi is because his mother and her partner went to the grave yard and the police did not speak to him as you claim.

Have you any proof to show what you are saying is true?

Do you know for 100% that he had no alibi or was not spoken to by police?

What legal status would your speculation have in any court?

Referring to the article link you posted I asked

I asked what relevence does it have to this murder conviction?

[nugnug]

http://caseblog.wronglyaccusedperson.org.uk/luke-mitchell-is-innocent/the-finding-of-the-body/post-mortem/

[Janet]

So you cannot answer the questions after all. I thought not.

It is clear you do not know the answer to these questions and the link you keep posting does not have the answers either.

All you have is supposition and speculation.

[nugnug]

well thats up to the reader to decide it dident post just for you the links for you.

why do you think the entire world has to justify itself to you.

now your posting the tabloid version of events witch you quoting as the gospel truth and im posting a different version of events.

from a diffrent.

[nugnug]

http://caseblog.wronglyaccusedperson.org.uk/luke-mitchell-is-innocent/what-is-wrong-with-this-case/

[John]

Why are you posting links to a discredited site nuggy...oops forgot your mate runs it!   

[nugnug]

why is it descredited its up to reader to decide weather its descredited or not.

something is not discredited becouse keeps saying.

deascredited discredited disredited over and over agian how ever much you might wish that was true.

you never did get over being banned from there did you.

http://caseblog.wronglyaccusedperson.org.uk/luke-mitchell-is-innocent/the-tattoo-evidence/the-manson-connection/

[Janet]

well thats up to the reader to decide it dident post just for you the links for you.

why do you think the entire world has to justify itself to you.

now your posting the tabloid version of events witch you quoting as the gospel truth and im posting a different version of events.

from a diffrent.

The questions I asked are valid ones and nothing to do with tabloid news. You cannot answer the questions. That is crystal clear.
Are you the entire world? I asked you, who is one person, a few questions. Instead of answering you would rather waffle on about anything other than answer a simple question. I can see a pattern here with that. If you do not like the question or what is said you change the subject and ignore the question then waffle on about something else.

You allege that Joseph Jones was not spoken to by police. You also allege that he had no alibi.

You do not know the answers to these questions, yet expect me or anyone else to take your word as the truth.

Have you any proof to show what you are saying is true?

Do you know for 100% that he had no alibi or was not spoken to by police?

What legal status would your speculation have in any court?

What relevence was the news article link you posted about someone being done for drunk driving a few months ago to this murder case?

I also asked several pages back if you had seen all or even any of the police statements. You cannot answer any of these simple questions.

[nugnug]

it proven fact he has no albi.

but there own admission his mum and stepfather visited a cemetery at the time of the murder leaving him home alone.

so no alibi

or are saing judy and allen dident go to the cemetery are you saying there lying.