The murder of 14 year-old schoolgirl Jodi Jones near Edinburgh on 30 June 2003

[nugnug]

I don't know what they are going to do, but I do know it's not looking good and like I said an educated opinion.

As for the book, of course I know what it's about or else I wouldn't of made a comment.

ok tell us what the books about the books about then mat.

[guest154]

ok tell us what the books about the books about then mat.

What?? 

[guest154]

If you mean tell you what the Satanic Bible is about  - then it isn't too hard to work out for yourself, Nuggsy. Or you can simply google it.

[nugnug]

you said you knew what there book was about dident you.

[guest154]

But back to the case, Nugnug - do you think it's strange that SL names LM's brother as a suspect in the SCCRC submission?

What do you think she's trying to do there?

[nugnug]

If you mean tell you what the Satanic Bible is about  - then it isn't too hard to work out for yourself, Nuggsy. Or you can simply google it.

ok tell us whats its about then.

[nugnug]

But back to the case, Nugnug - do you think it's strange that SL names LM's brother as a suspect in the SCCRC submission?

What do you think she's trying to do there?

she hasnt your just making shit up as usaul

[guest154]

ok tell us whats its about then.

Think of the 10 commandments......and then reverse them.

she hasnt your just making shit up as usaul

Feel free to ask her, nugnug. 

[nugnug]

Luke Mitchell is reverting to type, it was only a matter of time before his true interest in the dark arts reemerged once more. 

Mitchell was missing at the exact time that Jodi had her throat cut and despite claiming to have walked home from school not one of the other schoolchildren could give him an alibi.  He was however seen by witnesses standing by the side of the road a short distance from the murder scene just minutes after Jodi was killed.  He claimed to have been at home when his older brother Shane arrived home from work but Shane testified in court that this was not the case and that he would have known if his younger brother were in the house.  This effectively destroyed any possible alibi.

Mitchell supporter Sandra Lean has never been able to explain any of these inconsistencies and has always attempted to blame just about anyone else who ever had contact with Jodi.  Further DNA testing is yet another attempt to implicate these other individuals at any cost.

why is the granny robber being allowed to post her again.

[nugnug]

Think of the 10 commandments......and then reverse them.

Feel free to ask her, nugnug. 

im asking where is your source,

or are you just making shit up as usaul.

[guest154]

im asking where is your source,

or are you just making shit up as usaul.

You haven't once asked me for my source. Like I've said. An educated guess. You can choose to not believe it, but that doesn't make it any less true. You could always ask SL to come here and deny it? Or you can as her personally.

But whether you believe it or not - it's the truth. The submissions to the SCCRC name LM's brother as a potential suspect.

From now on I won't be replying to any of your posts that aren't spelt properly or at least use punctuation, it's not difficult and I'm tired of trying to work out what you're trying to say.

[nugnug]

You haven't once asked me for my source. Like I've said. An educated guess. You can choose to not believe it, but that doesn't make it any less true. You could always ask SL to come here and deny it? Or you can as her personally.

But whether you believe it or not - it's the truth. The submissions to the SCCRC name LM's brother as a potential suspect.

From now on I won't be replying to any of your posts that aren't spelt properly or at least use punctuation, it's not difficult and I'm tired of trying to work out what you're trying to say.

im asking for your source now why are you afriad to give it,

nobody who was telling the truth would be.

[John]

I would take those press reports with a massive pinch of salt.

Was/could Shane have been certain that Luke was not in the house at the given time?

John, what are your thoughts about the lie detector tests that both Luke and his mother passed?
I, myself have always been quite sceptical about such tests, but the fact that they both passed causes me to wonder a little.

Shane was absolutely positive he wasn't in the house as he was looking at porn in his bedroom and was listening for anyone coming into the house. It wasn't a big house by any means so it would not have been very difficult to hear someone come in and start messing around in the kitchen as Luke claimed he did.

Bottom line is he has no alibi and was identified by two witnesses near the murder scene. Some minutes later he was seen again by several others further up the road.  The chances of two almost identical youths wearing the exact same clothes being on the same stretch of road at almost the same time is incredibly small.

Mitchell was a troubled child by all accounts who was left to run wild and do more or less whatever he wanted. He was a heavy user of cannabis and had all the paraphernalia in his bedroom for weighing and bagging the drug for resale to other schoolchildren.  The slaying of Jodi wasn't by any means the first time he had threatened a young girl with a hunting knife.

The polygraph test or lie detector is merely a gimmick fit only for daytime TV programmes.  It has no relevance and no legal status. 

[John]

But back to the case, Nugnug - do you think it's strange that SL names LM's brother as a suspect in the SCCRC submission?

What do you think she's trying to do there?

Older brother Shane also changed his story in relation to his whereabouts before arriving home on the afternoon that Jodi was murdered.  In court he testified that his memory was impaired due to drug use.

[nugnug]

where did you read that.