Author Topic: The murder of 14 year-old schoolgirl Jodi Jones near Edinburgh on 30 June 2003  (Read 1055535 times)

0 Members and 39 Guests are viewing this topic.

Janet

  • Guest
No crocodile tears on this occasion?



Luke Mitchell and mother Corinne with family pet Mia in tow, attend the grave of murder victim Jodi Jones just hours after her funeral.  Mitchell was told to stay away from the cemetery by Judy Jones, the victim's mother, but couldn't resist making an issue of it.

Hours earlier Mitchell had given an interview to James Matthews of Sky News.

Transcript follows.....

well anyone would want to viset there girlfriends thats just called being human.

and lay a tribute.

Wish you would make your mind up. It was suggested in court that Luke Mitchell was seeing another girl Kimberly Thompson at the same time he was seeing poor Jodi.

The response to that from the Mitchell camp was that he was just a young boy and it was not a serious adult relationship and he was not two timing. (or words to that effect)

Ms Thompson said in court up until she heard about the murder she believed she was his girlfriend. Now why would she think this? Is this not two timing? Most teenage girls would see it as exactly that.

So if it was not a serious relationship like adults have and he could have as many girlfriends as he liked, what gave him or his mother the right to go to the grave when they had been told to stay away?

Not only did he go to the graveside with his mother and a girl pal plus a dog, they ended up with media there too. Plus giving the Sky interview on the very day Jodi was being buried was sickening.

Why did these people need to continually put themselves in the spotlight?

They would not like it if they told someone not to go somewhere and they did. The Mitchells have no respect for anyone.


Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17245
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
threes no proof Kimberly Thomson was his girlfriend.

even if there was 14 lad having 2 girlfriends is hardly that unusual.

i hardly think it makes them guilty of murder.

visiting the grave of someone you love is only human.

Janet

  • Guest
threes no proof Kimberly Thomson was his girlfriend.

even if there was 14 lad having 2 girlfriends is hardly that unusual.

i hardly think it makes them guilty of murder.

visiting the grave of someone you love is only human.

Well she testified in court that she was his girlfriend.  Luke Mitchell never stood up in court and said she wasn't his girlfriend did he?

Having two girlfriends could be a motive for murder.

Visiting the grave of a child, whose mother had insisted he was not to go there was a total lack of respect.
They should have abided by the Jones family decision but no they knew better.

There is no excuse whatsoever for them being at the grave against the mothers wishes. They had no rights to be there plain and simples.


« Last Edit: May 17, 2011, 12:03:AM by Janet »

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17245
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
if love someone you visit there grave weather you are told to stay away or or not.

« Last Edit: May 17, 2011, 12:07:AM by nugnug »

Offline shonapugs

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2669
Or, if you were intelligent enough, you might keep your head down, show some respect and grieve at a distance...............

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17245
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
An excellent post Janet which clearly shows that the Mitchell family lied through their teeth prior to and during the trial.  It is a sheer impossibility that two boys could be in a small house together for over half an hour with one of them making dinner and not hear each other.  Corinne Mitchell bleats on about Luke being in the garden when Shane came in and that is why they did not see each other.  That is quite possible but it is impossible for Luke to have prepared dinner including burning the chicken pie and Shane not noticing it especially when he was involved in an activity upstairs which he admitted he would only have done had the house been empty.

Add to this the fact that not one child ever came forward to say that they had seen Luke go home from school that afternoon, saw him go to his house around 4.40pm or saw him leave home at 5.30pm.  What is ever worse is that I offered to provide a reward for any witness who would come forward and give Luke Mitchell that crucial alibi and I was shot down in flames. 

It would appear that the Mitchell family would rather their son spend the next 13 years in prison than go searching for witnesses...to me that speaks volumes!

Telephone Hotline   still available for any witnesses  07092 984231

Did you see Luke Mitchell between 4.00pm and 5.40pm on the day of Jodi's murder?



http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-12877258.html

are you going to tell peple how much that call will cost them.

Janet

  • Guest
Or, if you were intelligent enough, you might keep your head down, show some respect and grieve at a distance...............

Exactly Shonapugs. Just what I have thought for a long long time.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17245
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Or, if you were intelligent enough, you might keep your head down, show some respect and grieve at a distance...............

when your young you dont think like that.

Offline shonapugs

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2669
Blimey, nugnug, this is a particularly horrible and sad case. But, sadly, it doesn't take much working out. That poor young girl, and a scared boyfriend, and a "if I can't have you, then nobody can" scenario. It's all a bit Jeremy Kyle, isn't it?

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17245
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
The log burner situated in the Mitchell's back garden where the prosecution contend that Luke's clothing was burned on the afternoon of the murder.  Several of Corinne Mitchell's neighbours spoke of an unusual wafting smell emanating from the Mitchell garden.





exept the police found no trace of any clothes being burned.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17245
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Blimey, nugnug, this is a particularly horrible and sad case. But, sadly, it doesn't take much working out. That poor young girl, and a scared boyfriend, and a "if I can't have you, then nobody can" scenario. It's all a bit Jeremy Kyle, isn't it?

exept there none of his dna on the body.

but theres another guys sperm and blood on there.

how does he clean his own dna off and leave someone elses on there.

Janet

  • Guest
nugnug

what intrigues me about you is you came from nowhere on another forum, claiming only to be someone who had read a particular book, with no more knowledge of the case than was online or in the one chapter of a book.
You also stated you did not know anyone from the Mitchell camp yet here you are yet again being the spokesperson with all the answers to any questions. Or rather trying to deflect from any negative posts made about the case.

As for the DNA. Where is the proof of this? No one ever gets to see the proof of anything. It is selectively typed out and that is not proof.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17245
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
i dont have to explian myself for having a different opinion to you.

steven kelly is not denying his dna is on there nor are the police there jus disputing how it got there.

by innocent transfer or by other means.

« Last Edit: May 17, 2011, 12:36:AM by nugnug »

Janet

  • Guest
i dont have myself for having a different opinion to you.

steven kelly is not denying his dna is on there nor are the police there jus disputing how it got there.

by innocent transfer or by other means.

Are you accusing someone of murder here?

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17245
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
no all i am saying is you cant clean off your own dna and leave the dna of other peoples on there.

how did luke clear all his dna and from her all hers from him leaving no trace of himself being there.

but leave steven kellys on there plus unknown profiles of other people.
« Last Edit: May 17, 2011, 12:47:AM by nugnug »