Scipio why do you think Dr Craig only picked one particular wound on each body to mention in his statement ?
This has always puzzled me - why did he not mention all the other gunshot wounds ?
Because he didn't carefully inspect the bodies to count each wound which would have required moving the bodies to inspect every inch and cleaning the blood away to make sure you find them all. His job was to determine if they were dead. He noted what he thought could be a fatal shot on each body and the fact they had no vital signs so that he could say they were dead apparently from being shot.
I don't know if he gave any other statements or testified about the time of death or condition of the bodies such as partial rigor. I haven't seen any other statements only a claim he stated they could could died anytime overnight.
By the way, this is one of the things used to twist. Some Jeremy supporters suggest that Sheila only had 1 wound because he only noted 1 and that this proves the second was fired after he was gone. But that logic requires asserting the shots to the others were also subsequent. But they don't do that which shows deception is at play not just making a mistake and not realizing he only mentioned 1 wound for each victim. Upon scrutiny most claims aimed at supporting Jeremy are akin to this and feature twisting to deceive. The claim that there is evidence Nevill called police himself is a perfect example. Also the claim that there was more than 1 suppressor because there were 3 exhibits SBJ/1, DB/1 and DRB/1 but documents show that these are all references to the same suppressor and detail how and why the change occurred. The documents that use DB/1 and DRB/1 were not created in August 1985 but rather months later.
When you do this you lose credibility and the public at large will not trust a thing you say even when you say something valid. So it is not wise to intentionally distort.
Instead of just dismissing a claim based on who made it I am willing to look at the claim to evaluate it but most won't.
