Sunday Times magazine Article / David James Smith / 11th July 2010...

[susan]

april love your post hope Adam is taking notice I will be going off shortly so you and Adam  can share posts I will return.

[Jane]

april love your post hope Adam is taking notice I will be going off shortly so you and Adam  can share posts I will return.

NOT a prospect to entirely relish, Susan. Perhaps I too should leave and return later. Adams admits that he's happy not to be responded to. 

[Adam]

Adam, HOW very interesting. TOTAL bollocks of course, but still interesting. Please enlighten me as to how THREE DAY OLD blood "was sticky, as if it had been hurriedly cleaned"? Are you trying to say that blood remains sticky however long it remains in contact with a surface? Are you tryin g to say that a certain type of blood remains in contact with a surface? Are you saying that had it been cleaned slowly as opposed to "hurriedly" it wouldn't be sticky?

This is a Sunday Times interview with Jeremy. Total bollocks ?

I do not know about stickiness. But things do get sticky.

[Jane]

This is a Sunday Times interview with Jeremy. Total bollocks ?

I do not know about stickiness. But things do get sticky.

REALLY Adam? You mean to tell me that the personal view of a professional journalist of the calibre employed by the Sunday Times, is that traces of three day old blood on a non absorbent surface are sticky. Silly me, I thought the rellies had said it. Perhaps next time you quote you should make it clear, not only that it IS a quote, but WHOSE it is and I wouldn't accuse YOU of talking bollocks when it was someone else who was responsible.

[Caroline]

This is a Sunday Times interview with Jeremy. Total bollocks ?

I do not know about stickiness. But things do get sticky.

Only PART of it is an interview with Jeremy, there is also an interview with DB and it is HE who claims the silencer was 'sticky' - you should try reading the article before you post it!

[Jane]

Only PART of it is an interview with Jeremy, there is also an interview with DB and it is HE who claims the silencer was 'sticky' - you should try reading the article before you post it!

Caroline, thanks for the vindication

[Caroline]

Caroline, thanks for the vindication

You're welcome April

[Adam]

Only PART of it is an interview with Jeremy, there is also an interview with DB and it is HE who claims the silencer was 'sticky' - you should try reading the article before you post it!

I have read it thank you. Then I posted it on here, as most people had not read it as they kept asking me about the sticky silencer.

You need to focus on the article and the 14 forensic points why Sheila did not massacre her family. Rather than on me. Although usually I would not mind attention from an attractive woman like you.

[Caroline]

I have read it thank you. Then I posted it on here, as most people had not read it as they kept asking me about the sticky silencer.

You need to focus on the article and the 14 forensic points why Sheila did not massacre her family. Rather than on me. Although usually I would not mind attention from an attractive woman like you.

If you read it, why insist that it was an interview with Jeremy when it was quite clear that April was referring to the David Boutflour comments??

I already know what I think about the case the the 14 point list you dragged from another board isn't going to make any difference. The 14 point list is simply the 'authors' take on things (which isn't you).

As for your last comment ....... cheeky!! 

[Jane]

I have read it thank you. Then I posted it on here, as most people had not read it as they kept asking me about the sticky silencer.

You need to focus on the article and the 14 forensic points why Sheila did not massacre her family. Rather than on me. Although usually I would not mind attention from an attractive woman like you.

Please don't flatter yourself by imagining that people believe you have the answers.

[Adam]

For Graheme.

[grahameb]

For Graheme.

Exact words that bamber is supposed to have said against JM please. That is an article. Now show me the words of bamber please.

[Adam]

He believes once she had started she couldn't stop & had to keep the lies going. Of course he calls them lies.

'Julie always said to me, ' if you sleep with Lizzie I will kill you'

Both from the Sunday Times article. 

[Alias]

He believes once she had started she couldn't stop & had to keep the lies going. Of course he calls them lies.

'Julie always said to me, ' if you sleep with Lizzie I will kill you'

Both from the Sunday Times article.

Well, she tried to smother him, so basically he is telling the truth!

[grahameb]

He believes once she had started she couldn't stop & had to keep the lies going. Of course he calls them lies.

'Julie always said to me, ' if you sleep with Lizzie I will kill you'

Both from the Sunday Times article.

So firstly you show me this article as PROOF of what bad things that Bamber is supposed to hjave said about JM. But you end up repudiating the article yourself? Man you are totally mixed up.