Sunday Times magazine Article / David James Smith / 11th July 2010...

[mike tesko]

Sunday Times magazine Article / David James Smith / 11th July 2010...

Read the article:-

[Elizabeth]

I read this article just recently online, an interesting one!

[Janet (Formerly known as Takeshi)]

I read this article just recently online, an interesting one!

Me too and all I can say is what a disappointment. This guy is granted the first interview EVER with JB and all he gives us is a handful of irrelevant oneliners. He was supposed to be with JB for several hours. I am sure he got something more valuable than what we were given in print.

[jon]

I read this article just recently online, an interesting one!

Me too and all I can say is what a disappointment. This guy is granted the first interview EVER with JB and all he gives us is a handful of irrelevant oneliners. He was supposed to be with JB for several hours. I am sure he got something more valuable than what we were given in print.

Couldnt agree more , awful journalism why didnt he research the evidence and do what people on here try to do pick holes in it ,or not as the case maybe , then anything that doesnt look good for JB get his explanation !

[Paul]

More on the author:

Last year respected crime author David James Smith became the first journalist to interview Bamber in prison and said he found him ‘all too human and understandable’.

'Except for the part of him that I felt was hidden,’ he added. 'The corner of his soul that carried the knowledge of what had really happened that night 25 years ago, and who had really killed his family.'


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1355901/Jeremy-Bamber-NOT-freed-Appeal-hearing-1985-family-murder-refused.html#ixzz1HAhUPZrB

[jon]

More on the author:

Last year respected crime author David James Smith became the first journalist to interview Bamber in prison and said he found him ‘all too human and understandable’.

'Except for the part of him that I felt was hidden,’ he added. 'The corner of his soul that carried the knowledge of what had really happened that night 25 years ago, and who had really killed his family.'


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1355901/Jeremy-Bamber-NOT-freed-Appeal-hearing-1985-family-murder-refused.html#ixzz1HAhUPZrB

Are you saying its the same reporter ?

[Paul]

More on the author:

Last year respected crime author David James Smith became the first journalist to interview Bamber in prison and said he found him ‘all too human and understandable’.

'Except for the part of him that I felt was hidden,’ he added. 'The corner of his soul that carried the knowledge of what had really happened that night 25 years ago, and who had really killed his family.'


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1355901/Jeremy-Bamber-NOT-freed-Appeal-hearing-1985-family-murder-refused.html#ixzz1HAhUPZrB

Are you saying its the same reporter ?

Is my post unclear? I provided the source?

I recalled the name from the Daily Mail article and since that name is in the subject line of this thread, I thought I'd post the relevant part of that article, along with the source.

The Daily Mail article is by 'Daily Mail Reporter'. I have no idea who that is.

[chelmsey]

Have just had a look at the link that you posted.Regarding the two photographs of the gun in and not in the window.........is it just me,or do they not even appear to be the same room? In the photo WITH the gun,where have the curtains disappeared to? Or even the wallpaper ? (look to the right of the window).The photo without the gun is clearly the main bedroom,but IMO the photo without the gun appears to be some kind of junk/storage room.Note the mess and ironing board etc.Does anyone recall seeing an ironing board in any of the other photos of main bedroom? Im off to have a look     

[Adam]

Had some problems finding it again online. But have found it here.

[Adam]

Says silencer was sticky, as if it had been hurridly cleaned.

The article is on Jeremy's official site. But it was not not appearing when I clicked on it earlier.

[nugnug]

thanks for that adam.

[Alias]

How do you deduce that a silencer has been hurriedly wiped because it is sticky??? Just BS. For all I know it could have been sticky from all the rellie-fingers pawing at it!

[Adam]

For Susan.

[susan]

Adam don't open your links you may have put a virus in it for me

[Jane]

Says silencer was sticky, as if it had been hurridly cleaned.

The article is on Jeremy's official site. But it was not not appearing when I clicked on it earlier.

Adam, HOW very interesting. TOTAL bollocks of course, but still interesting. Please enlighten me as to how THREE DAY OLD blood "was sticky, as if it had been hurriedly cleaned"? Are you trying to say that blood remains sticky however long it remains in contact with a surface? Are you tryin g to say that a certain type of blood remains in contact with a surface? Are you saying that had it been cleaned slowly as opposed to "hurriedly" it wouldn't be sticky?