Is Sheila guilty?

[Adam]

And the defence were duff.They needed a swift kick up the backside to get them going.

Jeremy paid for the most expensive lawyers available. And best.

If David Napley could not win the case. No one could .

[lookout]

Jeremy paid for the most expensive lawyers available. And best.

If David Napley could not win the case. No one could .

The best ? It wouldn't have appeared so. I thought Napley passed it to Terzeon,of the same company.

[nugnug]

i she no reason to think they were best best and expensive arnt the same thing.

and it dont matter how good a barrister is if evidence is withheld from him.

[lookout]

 That's right nugs. Evidence had no right whatsoever to be withheld-------and still is.Why ?
They were working with one hand tied behind their backs.

[Adam]

http://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/spl/aberdeen/sir-david-napley-1.483443

[nugnug]

that just the herlad was in groveling mood that day.

[Adam]

i she no reason to think they were best best and expensive arnt the same thing.

and it dont matter how good a barrister is if evidence is withheld from him.

What evidence was withheld ?

[Adam]

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,5213.0.html

[lookout]

What evidence was withheld ?

We don't know because it's withheld------d'oh !

[nugnug]

they few laywers have psycjc abilitys have ever good they are so cant work on evedence they dont know about.

[Jan]

Adam has obviously never worked on a farm. Because the farm workers would see the family every day. I was not say I got they would be character witnesses. But it seems they may never have been interviewed.  Therefore the defence could not call them.

[nugnug]

i would of thought yes especially in those days.

[lookout]

 Someone probably thought it unnecessary,,but that someone was very wrong not to have included every piece of paperwork that there was available.

[nugnug]

well i supose it sepends how many pieces of paperwork there were.

[Adam]

Adam has obviously never worked on a farm. Because the farm workers would see the family every day. I was not say I got they would be character witnesses. But it seems they may never have been interviewed.  Therefore the defence could not call them.

I have not worked on a farm.

Interviewed by who ? The defence can call who they want to testify. Jeremy would have told his defence if he thought the farm workers could assist him.