Author Topic: Accomplice, who was he?  (Read 38643 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

No-Bits

  • Guest
Re: Accomplice, who was he?
« Reply #495 on: May 12, 2014, 08:15:PM »
It could have happened this way. I would still go straight to the main bedroom first. Once a 6.4 male  & a woman are out of the way, I can take my time reloading.

Ight be able to make it look like suicide'.  That was always Jeremys plan.

I can't imagine how a person could be confident in being able to stage a suicide, which is why I think the opportunity presented itself rather than being the original plan, likewise with the phone call he invented from Nevill. 

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44315
Re: Accomplice, who was he?
« Reply #496 on: May 12, 2014, 08:20:PM »
I can't imagine how a person could be confident in being able to stage a suicide, which is why I think the opportunity presented itself rather than being the original plan, likewise with the phone call he invented from Nevill.

So you are saying Jeremy just planned to massacre them & blame it on a random burgler.

Which would have meant Jeremy did not plan to phone the police.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Accomplice, who was he?
« Reply #497 on: May 12, 2014, 08:20:PM »
Any mother would throw herself onto her children too,,to protect them and take a chance at getting shot themselves. I know I would.




Sheila and Neville were both more than capable of shooting an intruder,,whether it was Jeremy or not !
Before things got out of hand,,that is,,if only to protect the children.

No-Bits

  • Guest
Re: Accomplice, who was he?
« Reply #498 on: May 12, 2014, 08:43:PM »
So you are saying Jeremy just planned to massacre them & blame it on a random burgler.

Which would have meant Jeremy did not plan to phone the police.

I think there is a possibility of that being the case.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44315
Re: Accomplice, who was he?
« Reply #499 on: May 12, 2014, 09:11:PM »
I think there is a possibility of that being the case.

How would the random burgler know how to get in ?

Why would the random burgler break in when there were five people in the house ?

Why would a random burgler shoot everyone. Women, children, old men etc. Burglers go into houses to take stuff. Not to massacre.

What was the random burgler going to take ?


Julie said Jeremy wanted to use Sheila as a scapegoat. I believe her.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

No-Bits

  • Guest
Re: Accomplice, who was he?
« Reply #500 on: May 12, 2014, 09:16:PM »
How would the random burgler know how to get in ?

Why would the random burgler break in when there were five people in the house ?

Why would a random burgler shoot everyone. Women, children, old men etc. Burglers go into houses to take stuff. Not to massacre.

What was the random burgler going to take ?


Julie said Jeremy wanted to use Sheila as a scapegoat. I believe her.

What random burglar?  ??? I think you have misunderstood.

I think JB massacred his family, I just don't see how staging a suicide for Sheila could be guaranteed,  I think the opportunity presented itself.

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: Accomplice, who was he?
« Reply #501 on: May 12, 2014, 09:19:PM »
I think there is a possibility of that being the case.

If he had actually staged a break in then in many ways would have been better off.  The problem with that is burglars might kill someone who encouters them but then usually take off.  They don't go room to room looking to kill everyone unless they also want to keep robbing the house but usually they don't have such guts. 

He thought framing his siter was better but he botched it and worse he gave away he was the one who did it by making up the phone call from Nevill.  If he neve rtold Julie a thing and neve rmade up that phone call people would suspec the did it but would not have been able to prove it in court.  That call and her testimony established that he is the one who framed his sister and not someone else.  Those 2 things are really what did him in.

If he actually set up a burglary instead maybe he would have doens so successfully who knows.  But he didn't so no use in wondering and he boxed his lawyers in because the scenario he did run with means either he did it or Sheila there is no room for anyone else.

   
Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

No-Bits

  • Guest
Re: Accomplice, who was he?
« Reply #502 on: May 12, 2014, 09:19:PM »
Does anybody else think JB could be confident in getting Sheila in to a position where he could make it look like suicide?

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Accomplice, who was he?
« Reply #503 on: May 12, 2014, 09:21:PM »
Harters,,I don't think Jeremy had the guts to skin a rabbit,let alone slaughter his whole family.

It would have had to have been someone insane ( which it has been proved that he isn't )

No-Bits

  • Guest
Re: Accomplice, who was he?
« Reply #504 on: May 12, 2014, 09:22:PM »
Harters,,I don't think Jeremy had the guts to skin a rabbit,let alone slaughter his whole family.

It would have had to have been someone insane ( which it has been proved that he isn't )

Obviously I disagree.

Neil

  • Guest
Re: Accomplice, who was he?
« Reply #505 on: May 12, 2014, 09:26:PM »

I don't do scenarios, Neil :)
Sorry April, couldn't resist.  ;D

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Accomplice, who was he?
« Reply #506 on: May 12, 2014, 09:27:PM »
Sheila's accomplice has a lot to answer for...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: Accomplice, who was he?
« Reply #507 on: May 12, 2014, 09:27:PM »
Does anybody else think JB could be confident in getting Sheila in to a position where he could make it look like suicide?

No!

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Accomplice, who was he?
« Reply #508 on: May 12, 2014, 09:28:PM »

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: Accomplice, who was he?
« Reply #509 on: May 12, 2014, 09:29:PM »




I know. :-[

You two are so cute together!  ;D