Author Topic: The Noble Cause Framing Theory  (Read 65861 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: The Noble Cause Framing Theory
« Reply #510 on: May 06, 2014, 10:13:PM »




Oh,Christ,,you'll start her off again,Grahame. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

No point Lookout his version is on the official site but there is another version. If both are posted then people can make up their own minds  ;D
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The Noble Cause Framing Theory
« Reply #511 on: May 06, 2014, 10:21:PM »
No point Lookout his version is on the official site but there is another version. If both are posted then people can make up their own minds  ;D




Well I suppose it does no harm to see the two versions,,then I can toss a coin. ;D ;D

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: The Noble Cause Framing Theory
« Reply #512 on: May 06, 2014, 10:22:PM »



Well I suppose it does no harm to see the two versions,,then I can toss a coin. ;D ;D

Sometimes that's the only answer!!  ;D ;D
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The Noble Cause Framing Theory
« Reply #513 on: May 06, 2014, 10:23:PM »
 Is the other version edited,by the way ?  ;D  Like the before and after of the police logs/notes ??

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The Noble Cause Framing Theory
« Reply #514 on: May 06, 2014, 10:27:PM »
 Hey,,I bet this didn't reach trial,did it ? It might have generated some interest if it had been.

Is this Davidson the same chap who'd reiterrated what he'd been told about there being two bodies on entry  at WHF?  A " murder and a suicide " ?

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: The Noble Cause Framing Theory
« Reply #515 on: May 06, 2014, 10:29:PM »
I am really sad now. GN  :'(

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: The Noble Cause Framing Theory
« Reply #516 on: May 06, 2014, 10:30:PM »
Is the other version edited,by the way ?  ;D  Like the before and after of the police logs/notes ??

No, it's actually from the undertaker who explains why he took the rings off and who they were given to and why.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The Noble Cause Framing Theory
« Reply #517 on: May 06, 2014, 10:32:PM »
No, it's actually from the undertaker who explains why he took the rings off and who they were given to and why.




 Oh,,I see.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: The Noble Cause Framing Theory
« Reply #518 on: May 06, 2014, 10:40:PM »
I am really sad now. GN  :'(



Alias, it's a little damp, but you can borrow my hankie :'( :'( :) :)

guest154

  • Guest
Re: The Noble Cause Framing Theory
« Reply #519 on: May 06, 2014, 10:41:PM »
No, it's actually from the undertaker who explains why he took the rings off and who they were given to and why.

Between us, I think we added some wisdom/clarification/actual thought process..  to this 'horror!'


Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: The Noble Cause Framing Theory
« Reply #520 on: May 06, 2014, 11:04:PM »
Between us, I think we added some wisdom/clarification/actual thought process..  to this 'horror!'

I hear the word propaganda looming close by - I'm sure Martin won't agree!  ;D
Few people have the imagination for reality

guest154

  • Guest
Re: The Noble Cause Framing Theory
« Reply #521 on: May 06, 2014, 11:45:PM »
I hear the word propaganda looming close by - I'm sure Martin won't agree!  ;D

I'm sure he will congratulate you for shooting down what was becoming propaganda.

Either that or you'll wake up to a 4 paragraph post that talks about your genetics/moral code/real agenda and your star signs for the month.  ;)

Offline Martin

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 272
Re: The Noble Cause Framing Theory
« Reply #522 on: May 07, 2014, 12:15:AM »
I posted the link - so the story is there . It names the police as passing the rings to other members of the family against Jeremys wishes - if it is not true then they can do something about it. If you are picking on my wording - then I have posted the link to get "the story correct"

Here is the link which shows Anne knew exactly what JB wanted done with the rings - So even if they HAD to be handed to the family then it is quite obvious where they should have gone.

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,497.msg8443.html#msg8443

personally IMO ::) it shows an unhealthy relationship between the police and the family . But no doubt that will be questioned.


Actually I am coming off the forum for a while as I am tired of everything supporting Jeremy being questioned - if I wanted that I would go to the red forum .

Discussion is one thing - nit picking is another.

I will be back after a break, and hope things improve.

There is no doubt that Caroline’s change of position has altered the balance of the forum to a pro guilt bias. Her basic routine, now, is to play the roll we had preciously seen carried out by such astute posters as Hartley, Bridget and Ian Stephens in various disguises and of course Steve_uk.

There is a saying “handsome is as handsome does” and the same applies to “pro guilt” or to any other description. The fact of the matter is that Caroline is undoubtedly, nowadays, giving her full support to the pro guilt side on a number of crucial issues and her tone when talking about Jeremy has become one which, at times, strongly hints at an underlying loathing of someone she believes is guilty.

She is fully entitled to change her opinion on the case, but for a person in her position of administrator to misrepresent her intentions is a cause for concern.

Talk of doubts and opinions is besides the point, here. The fact is that Caroline is, from a practical point of view, committed to opposing Jeremy’s defence with respect to prima facie evidence of his innocence and this opposition has already become routine and predictable. I am talking about all of that evidence which his defence believe points to Sheila’s death as having occurred at a time when Jeremy was with the police.


« Last Edit: May 17, 2014, 12:13:AM by Martin »

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: The Noble Cause Framing Theory
« Reply #523 on: May 07, 2014, 12:18:AM »
You could ask him.
Nah! I've done writing to him. He's got a one track mind. Keeps talking about his innocence for some reason. ::)

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: The Noble Cause Framing Theory
« Reply #524 on: May 07, 2014, 12:25:AM »
No, it's actually from the undertaker who explains why he took the rings off and who they were given to and why.
So  what is preventimg you from posting this other version Caroline? Also your source could prove interesting too.