0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Hi Steve, it is good to see you back but with respect, that post is not one of your best efforts How do you KNOW any of this? I am pretty sure you do not. There is absolutely no reported information which would lead anyone to believe Jeremy was a psychopath or suffered with Personality disorders. All psychopaths are narcissistic although not all narcissists are psychopaths. You cannot hide narcissism as it is just your personality, the way you operate although psychopaths can and do try to hide their true selves but Jeremy must be a super man to never let his guard down and show his true self. imo
But we had the Anders Behring Breivik case of a mass murderer of 77,who steeled himself using central nervous system stimulants just as Jeremy might well have done,yet they are both as sane as you or me once the effects of the drugs wear off.
Oh,aye Steve,,now you're getting carried away. Jeremy wasn't into steroids or anything of that nature,,so no way can you compare him with Breivik.
What was Jeremy's relationship with women? Like many young men of his ilk he had to adapt to the needs of the modern woman in a way his natural father never had to. He would shy away from Sheila when she began what we might call politely her theology discussions,otherwise women it seemed fitted in with Jeremy's wishes. The one exception was June for a huge period of his life who held de facto control,but lost it along with Jeremy's respect after returning from hospital the second time. Is this why Jeremy allegedly claimed to "f*cking hate my parents" because they stood in the way of the lifestyle he wanted?
He was taking central nervous system cocktails lookout,pre and post-murders.
Steve, EVERY generation has to adapt in ways their parents didn't. I doubt VERY much that Jeremy ever became involved with ANYONE'S deep and meaningful discussions, let alone a sister he rarely saw and whose mental problems/theological passions seemed not to manifest themselves until after she'd married, although they may have been underlying.
I think he'd been prescribed valium,,Steve. Nothing more fancy than that.
He did that to avoid being slapped,Steve,,because believe it or not,,Julie was a bad-tempered madam.
It's why I asked the question about Jeremy's relationship with women and I would appreciate the feminine perspective.
I had in mind the occasion when Jeremy twisted Julie's arm behind her back,wondering if this caused a flashback in her mind to her own predicament as she was growing up. Of course this has been dismissed as a pack of lies by some.
I created a thread on whether the 19 day trial was fair. No one came up with any decent reasons why it was not. When Liz Rimmington rang Stan Jones, with Julie present. Neither of them were thinking about 25k. They just wanted to tell the truth. About the caravan break in & murder. Jeremys lawyers have never been able to prove that Julies NOTW deal negates her testimony. But god knows they have tried. Jeremys own Youtube video said his relatives were rich in their own right & had no reason to lie. They were not criminals so would not decide in unison 4 days after the murder to commit such a major crime. They found the silencer and handed it in. Simple. They would have had to know Sheila's blood group and to effectivly put that blood into the silencer. Creating the back splatter effect. The silencer evidence has been accepted at trial & at appeals. It makes sense for Jeremy to use the silencer. If he did not, why was there no blood inside the rifle ? All the shots were either contact or close range according to the pathologist. So in other words the trial was fair. Jeremy had the best lawyers. They had several months to prepare. And had the best witness - Jeremy.
