Jeremys second phone call to Julie:

[maggie]

Who knows ?

As Jeremy stood up & said to Liz Rimmington before he was a suspect 'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Maybe he was speaking about the evening before the killings or the phone call? Quotes out of context are pretty meaningless.

[Adam]

Maybe he was speaking about the evening before the killings or the phone call? Quotes out of context are pretty meaningless.

 

[Jane]

Have you never lied.

Or committed a minor, victimless crime when young ? Yes claiming you're cheque book has been stolen is victimless. It was also Susans cheque book, suggesting she was the main force.

OR suggesting Julie didn't want her own name associated with the crime, which, let's be perfectly honest, had WHF not happened, it would have been SB who took the rap for it if they'd been caught.

[Adam]

OR suggesting Julie didn't want her own name associated with the crime, which, let's be perfectly honest, had WHF not happened, it would have been SB who took the rap for it if they'd been caught.

It was Susans cheque book. Interesting.

[Adam]

It was Jeremys caravan break in. Interesting.

[Caroline]

It was Susans cheque book. Interesting.

Yea, dear sweet Julie talked her best friend into committing fraud. Still, I'm sure you'll try and pin the idea onto Susan Battersby, even though it was Julie's idea.

[maggie]

It was Jeremys caravan break in. Interesting.

It was Julie's photograph in the newspaper. Interesting.

[Adam]

Oh dam. I forgot Julie was the Scarface of Goldsmiths college. Getting students hooked on heroin. She must have sent Jeremy on his drug buying holiday.

[Adam]

Yea, dear sweet Julie talked her best friend into committing fraud. Still, I'm sure you'll try and pin the idea onto Susan Battersby, even though it was Julie's idea.

Oh so Julie persuaded Susan to use her own cheque book.

When Julie was first interviewed by the police, were they aware of the cheque book fraud ? They were not aware of the caravan break in.

[Jane]

Oh dam. I forgot Julie was the Scarface of Goldsmiths college. Getting students hooked on heroin. She must have sent Jeremy on his drug buying holiday.

I wonder how proud of her actions you'd have been had you been her parent.

[Alias]

Yea, dear sweet Julie talked her best friend into committing fraud. Still, I'm sure you'll try and pin the idea onto Susan Battersby, even though it was Julie's idea.

Julie said so herself. She said she did it to "impress" Jeremy.  She is an expert pinning things she does herself on other people. Jeremy had absolutely nothing to do with that.
Love when nons have to defend Julie, because they HAVE to to be able to accept her testimony, but it is so hard, coz the girl was shifty, sleazy, dishonest and mean, and they know it! 

Drug dealing is not a victimless crime - neither is accessory to murder if you want to go that route.

[Caroline]

Oh so Julie persuaded Susan to use her own cheque book.

When Julie was first interviewed by the police, were they aware of the cheque book fraud ? They were not aware of the caravan break in.

I doubt that but she was no angel - she not only committed fraud, she involved her best friend - using her cheque book and then the whole thing was played down by the prosecution to make it LOOK as though she went cap on hand to apologise and seek retribution. However, that's not what happened - they were accompanied by an office,r who had already smoothed the cracks over with the banks head office. This is the part the jury didn't hear - they didn't go of their own accord, the whole admission to the bank was engineered to make Julie a more credible witness.

[grahameb]

It was Susans cheque book. Interesting.

If it was Susan's cheque book, where is the crime? If it was someone else's cheque book, then it is far from victimless?

[Alias]

If it was Susan's cheque book, where is the crime? If it was someone else's cheque book, then it is far from victimless?

Didn´t they tell the bank that Susan´s cheque book had been stolen - and then went on a buying spree with that exact cheque book? Would the bank have had to cover the losses the stores suffered from the thefts? If so, the bank was the victim.
There are no victimless crimes.

[grahameb]

Didn´t they tell the bank that Susan´s cheque book had been stolen - and then went on a buying spree with that exact cheque book? Would the bank have had to cover the losses the stores suffered from the thefts? If so, the bank was the victim.
There are no victimless crimes.

Ah I see. That shows I'm a bit thick.