A few posts back, you aimed a broadside at on of my posts in which I said scientific methods had failed to give conclusive evidence so all we were left with was conjecture, by saying that all conjecture did was convert the ignorant and your preference was to convert the knowledgeable rather that the ignorant because it was a challenge. It seems to me that the above, albeit that it was accepted by the court, is little more than conjecture because it matters not whether we believe Jeremy guilty or innocent, nothing of what you've said in the above is conclusive evidence.
It is not simply conjecture that the phone was removed fromt he bedroom in advance indicating pre-planning.
It is not simply conjecture that the shootings started in the bedrooms and that the killer tried to kill everyone in their beds except Sheila.
It is not simply conjecture that killing Sheila in her bed like the rest would reveal she too was murdered.
It is not simply conjecture that they were killed in bed so that they could put up the least resistance.
It is not conjecture that the killer had to use bullets from elsewhere than the box of ammo in the kitchen.
It is not conjecture that if Sheila had a goal to kill her entire family that she would have to do so while Jeremy was over in order to carry out a complete murder suicide.
There are many other things at play but this is enough to suggest preplanning and intentional execution.
Trying to suggest that the time of day only comports with something Julie would do is nonsense. It is what someone who wants the easiest execution plan would try. The claim was made how could Jeremy expect to control the whole family. The answer is to look at what happened, they were to be killed in bed. It is in fact a silly question because anyone honest would see the way he would go about it would be to try what happened.
Worse yet this preplanning evidence conflicts with the alleged claim Sheila suddeenly had a crazy episode.
