Further developments regarding phone calls:

[Adam]

I have come to the conclusion that you're either effing stupid altogether,,or just an aggravating troll who spends his time picking holes in posts all over the internet. You're unbelievably thick as well !

You stupid,  thick,  ignorent poster.

I do not post on any other forums. I do believe Jeremy is guilty. If I win the argument, deal with it.

[grahameb]

For this to work it would also help if Jeremy did not ring Julie at 3am. Something her flatmates would also witness.

Why did they change the timing of the phone call several times in their different statements?

[lookout]

You stupid,  thick,  ignorent poster.

I do not post on any other forums. I do believe Jeremy is guilty. If I win the argument, deal with it.

My oh my,,you don't like the truth either,do you ?

[Adam]

Jeremy was calm to the point of waiting for news from within the farmhouse. It was when he was told what had happened, that his calmness reverted to him crying uncontrollably,,which is the most normal function of anyone who is given this kind of news.

It did not say he cried much in Wilkes book. He just kept saying the same thing. Although he was very percific about what to do with the dog, - kill it.

Soon afterwards he annonced he was starving & cooked a nice brekkie. Then said to the police 'right, lets get on with it, I am ready to start when you are'. 

[lookout]

You stupid,  thick,  ignorent poster.

I do not post on any other forums. I do believe Jeremy is guilty. If I win the argument, deal with it.

It's you who can't deal with the fact that there's always two sides to a coin,,not me. Your attitude stinks !

[susan]

Adam is on the forum just to blacken Jeremy Bamber as much as possible he cares not if what he posts is true it suits his game and he is totally oblivious to other posters point of views he is not interested even if he is shown documented evidence it goes right over his head as it is not want he wants to hear.  He is not even clever as he repeats the same things verbatim style.

[Jane]

It did not say he cried much in Wilkes book. He just kept saying the same thing. Although he was very percific about what to do with the dog, - kill it.

Soon afterwards he annonced he was starving & cooked a nice brekkie. Then said to the police 'right, lets get on with it, I am ready to start when you are'.

So, in  Wilkes book "it did not say he cried much". What do you think that proves, IF anything?

Does ANY author describe to us, in the terms YOU choose, exactly WHAT quality of breakfast it was that Jeremy cooked.

I imagine that the police, NOT all noted for their empathy, would have been overjoyed by his matter of fact attitude.

[susan]

Adam it is obvious when you start insulting and being abusive to other posters you are loosing the argument try to act with a little more decorum and don't show your hand so much

[lookout]

It did not say he cried much in Wilkes book. He just kept saying the same thing. Although he was very percific about what to do with the dog, - kill it.

Soon afterwards he annonced he was starving & cooked a nice brekkie. Then said to the police 'right, lets get on with it, I am ready to start when you are'.

The word is SPECIFIC by the way ! Two can play at picking holes,,but I'm afraid you've picked the wrong person with which to do your nit-picking with.

[susan]

Adam did you see Wills and Harry cry at their dear Mothers funeral or the evening before when they were looking at the floral tributes and chatting to the crowds and actually smiling.  People with breeding don't show their emotions in public i.e. sorrow anger peevishness

[lookout]

Doubtless Jeremy would have had the bacon since the previous weekend which he made a sandwich of that morning. See how the police exaggerate ? Jeremy had most,if not all his meals at the farmhouse,particularly during harvest-time when he was there for the majority of the time.Like all young,single men,,his fridge would have had more beers in it than food.

[Jane]

The word is SPECIFIC by the way ! Two can play at picking holes,,but I'm afraid you've picked the wrong person with which to do your nit-picking with.

May I add to that by saying that the word is "allege" NOT alledge.

[lookout]

May I add to that by saying that the word is "allege" NOT alledge.

Serpently,April. He who thinks he knows everything and knows nothing.

[susan]

Adam I have not yet seen you win an argument but keep trying you may get there but not against lookout you wont concede defeat whilst you are still standing

[Jane]

You stupid,  thick,  ignorent poster.

I do not post on any other forums. I do believe Jeremy is guilty. If I win the argument, deal with it.

Adam, that is QUITE enough. It's FINE that you believe Jeremy is guilty. That's NOT what anyone has a problem with. The problem is a situation which arises from cause and effect. Your facetiousness and sarcasm, amongst other things, being the CAUSE of the EFFECT we experience. Now, it seems you've added RUDENESS to the mix

You complain that we focus on you but I suspect that you've contrived, through your attitude to the case, to MAKE yourself the focus. I also suspect it's something you enjoy doing along with point scoring and your need to be SEEN to win an argument.