Why was Jeremy not interviewed about the murders after his arrest?

[mike tesko]

Why was Jeremy not interviewed about the murders after his arrest, on 29th September 1985?

He was never questioned about the silencer / blood / paint evidence found in / on silencer DB/1 that had been sent to the Lab' on 30th August 1985...

[mike tesko]

If he had been questioned about the silencer after his arrest on 29th September 1985, how would EP have explained that they still had possession of the Bamber silencer, which was not sent to the Lab' to be checked for fibers, until 26th September 1985?

In other words...

How could silencer (DB/1) that was at the Lab' from 30th August 1985, which had the paint / blood evidence found upon / inside it, have been one and the same Bambner silencer (DRB/1)?

[mike tesko]

The silencer (DB/1) at the Lab' from 30th August 1985 inside which was found the crucial blood / paint evidence, could not be, and was not the same silencer (DRB/1) found in the gun cupboard at whf on 11th September 1985, which did not get sent to the Lab' until 26th September 1985...

[mike tesko]

If EP had interviewed Jeremy after his arrest on 29th September 1985, these facts would have become apparent...

[mike tesko]

If EP had interviewed Jeremy after his arrest, instead of just charging him with the murders - EP would have had to explain during interview, how DCI "Taff" Jones, and DS "Stan" Jones, knew about the silencer on 9th August 1985, the day before the relatives allegedly found it in the gun cupboard (10th August 1985)?

[mike tesko]

Because there was no interviews after Bambers arrest on 29th September 1985, it allowed EP / the relatives / and Lab documents / and witness statements to be altered, making all the different silencers, SBJ/1, DB/1 and DRB/1, into one and the same silencer...

They were allowed to make all these alterations, between 29th September 1985, and October 1986, in time for the prosecutions to rely upon the Bamber (DRB/1) silencer / blood / paint argument as part of its case...

Why wasn't Bamber interviewed, and given an opportunity to explain about the silencers and the blood and the paint, before EP charged him with the murders?

If Bamber had been interviewed and the silencer / blood / paint evidence had been put to him at that stage, he would have alerted the police to the fact that several of the relatives all had identical Parker hale silencers, and that the blood / paint evidence being referred to may have been found upon or inside a silencer belonging to one of them...

[mike tesko]

According to what Jeremy has told me in the past, a number of relatives all had identical looking Parker hale Silencers:-

(1) Anthony Pargeter
(2) Robert Boutflour
(3) David Boutflour
(4) Peter Eaton

Now, we know that EP had at least three different identical looking Parker Hale silencers in their possession at one stage or another as part of this investigation, but we do not know for sure who these three different silencers belonged to?

Three different identical looking Parker hale Silencers were brought to the court at the time Jeremy was tried for these murders, but the defense were not told about two of them, or why they were brought by police motorcycle outrider to the court?

In my opinion, one of these silencers must have been, SBJ/1, another DB/1 and of course, the Bamber silencer, DRB/1 (court exhibit 9)...

[mike tesko]

Everyones entitled to be interviewed before being charged, aren't they?

[Roch]

Everyones entitled to be interviewed before being charged, aren't they?

I'd like to think so.

[TheBrilliantMistake]

Everyones entitled to be interviewed before being charged, aren't they?

I'd like to think so.

WHAT?

No they aren't.

You can be charged any time they feel like it. Pre or post any interview/s
Although after being charged things become much more complicated and restricted, so sometimes it's best gather as much info as possible prior to charging....