Author Topic: Telephone issue - Extravaganza...  (Read 25573 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: Telephone issue - Extravaganza...
« Reply #165 on: December 28, 2013, 04:59:PM »
I just gave an answer.

Is this all you are going to go on about whenever I post ? Two call logs from two different people in different buildings. Both apparently lying for the last 28 years, along with the rest of the EP.

Seems you & Jeremy are going for the technicality. Good luck.
Adam, if Neville made that phone call to the police, Jeremy would not be off on a technicality, he would be innocent.  You seem to want to keep Jeremy in prison even if he's innocent.  That is very strange imo.

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: Telephone issue - Extravaganza...
« Reply #166 on: December 28, 2013, 05:01:PM »
Adam pity Julie did not think of young love when she sold him down the river ;D had she done it before the murders or IMMEDIATELY following I would have found her statement a little more credible.

I would also believe her more if her statements hadn´t CHANGED. In her initial statement she said that Jeremy had called her at 3:30 sounding worried, like he didn´t know what to do. He said that something was wrong at home. - Nothing about: Everything is going well. That came later.... hmmmm

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44411
Re: Telephone issue - Extravaganza...
« Reply #167 on: December 28, 2013, 05:03:PM »



"So what" Adam!!! SO WHAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Evidence may be withheld which means an innocent man has spent nearly 30 years in prison and all you can say is "SO WHAT" In my eyes it makes you a disgrace.

What evidence withheld ?

EP are not obliged to supply anything further unless instructed by law. Thought Jeremy had millions of documents in his cell. He's been appealing for the last 28 years.
« Last Edit: December 28, 2013, 05:04:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33781
Re: Telephone issue - Extravaganza...
« Reply #168 on: December 28, 2013, 05:04:PM »
Jeremy went into the field & appeared to vomit.

I believe Jeremy himself said nothing came up. Anyway Mugford said Jeremy knew of a way he could make himself sick. But that Mugford has also been lying for 28 years. Hasn't she ?



Given that the food he'd eaten from the previous night would have been digested there would have been nothing for him to vomit. Never heard of dry retching, Adam?

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Telephone issue - Extravaganza...
« Reply #169 on: December 28, 2013, 05:06:PM »
CA07 were still deployed to the incident one minute (3:25am) before MB's phone log was commenced, at 3:26am...

How could the occupants of CA07 have been deployed to the incident at the scene at 3:35am (3:25am), if the two phone logs (3:36 and 3:26am) were born out of the same call to police made by Jeremy?

Impossible...

Yet, if the line at whf was being monitored by special branch, and Ralph had made the call to Jeremy at around 3:25am, this would be the perfect explanation to account for why the occupants of CA07 were deployed to the scene, before Jeremy's call to police at 3:36am (PC West version), or 3:26am (MB version)...

CA07 may have been deployed to the incident as a result of special branch intervention...
« Last Edit: December 28, 2013, 05:09:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: Telephone issue - Extravaganza...
« Reply #170 on: December 28, 2013, 05:08:PM »
Hello lookout  probably the rellies convinced themselves Jeremy was guilty as it was very much to their advantage for him to be so.  Don't put Julie in this category she was saving her own neck and saw an opportunity to make money out of the tragedy lets be honest had she known of Jeremy's intentions for nearly a year she could have prevented it and when he was found guilty she should have been charged as an accessory and jailed

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44411
Re: Telephone issue - Extravaganza...
« Reply #171 on: December 28, 2013, 05:09:PM »
Adam, if Neville made that phone call to the police, Jeremy would not be off on a technicality, he would be innocent.  You seem to want to keep Jeremy in prison even if he's innocent.  That is very strange imo.

If Bonnett or anyone from Witham police station says he received a call from Neville, then Jeremy is innocent. So far no one has.

However PC West received a call from Jeremy. I agree with everyone there.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Telephone issue - Extravaganza...
« Reply #172 on: December 28, 2013, 05:10:PM »
Hello lookout  probably the rellies convinced themselves Jeremy was guilty as it was very much to their advantage for him to be so.  Don't put Julie in this category she was saving her own neck and saw an opportunity to make money out of the tragedy lets be honest had she known of Jeremy's intentions for nearly a year she could have prevented it and when he was found guilty she should have been charged as an accessory and jailed



Hi Susan,,JM was nothing but an opportunist in every way. They're bad people in my estimation.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: Telephone issue - Extravaganza...
« Reply #173 on: December 28, 2013, 05:13:PM »
april Jeremy was given a drop of brandy when the bodies of his family had been discovered and this is what made him vomit and was probably just the liquid. Most people know how to make themselves vomit fingers down throat hey ho vomit try it Adam.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: Telephone issue - Extravaganza...
« Reply #174 on: December 28, 2013, 05:14:PM »
lookout people without a soul IMO :(

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44411
Re: Telephone issue - Extravaganza...
« Reply #175 on: December 28, 2013, 05:15:PM »
april Jeremy was given a drop of brandy when the bodies of his family had been discovered and this is what made him vomit and was probably just the liquid. Most people know how to make themselves vomit fingers down throat hey ho vomit try it Adam.

No thanks.

Jeremy went into the field alone to ( appear to) vomit.

Or to collect his thoughts ?
« Last Edit: December 28, 2013, 05:18:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: Telephone issue - Extravaganza...
« Reply #176 on: December 28, 2013, 05:17:PM »
april Jeremy was given a drop of brandy when the bodies of his family had been discovered and this is what made him vomit and was probably just the liquid. Most people know how to make themselves vomit fingers down throat hey ho vomit try it Adam.

Why did the police have brandy with them?  :o

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: Telephone issue - Extravaganza...
« Reply #177 on: December 28, 2013, 05:17:PM »
Adam it is quite obvious Jeremy has found new evidence.  Watch this space then you can start a new thread ;D we will all read it ;D Maybe Mason Doyle has found new evidence buy the book when it is published in Spring.

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: Telephone issue - Extravaganza...
« Reply #178 on: December 28, 2013, 05:20:PM »
Why did the police have brandy with them?  :o
Think it was whisky not brandy?  Maybe they got it from the house?

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: Telephone issue - Extravaganza...
« Reply #179 on: December 28, 2013, 05:20:PM »
Think it was whisky not brandy?  Maybe they got it from the house?

From the crime scene...